Originally posted by SweetD
Why if we were trying to get rid of salary do we take a bigger contract back???
With manager Bob Brenly saying Sunday that he plans on using a more set lineup in 2004, the Diamondbacks decided that McCracken was expendable.
Originally posted by Indrid Cold
So in the end it works out to be Colbrunn plus Seattle's 1st round pick from last season for signing him as a free agent, for McCracken and $375K. Too bad Joe Jr can't work more deals like this instead of Durazo for Dessens, Kim for Hillenbrand, etc.
Definitely, it applies to the Durazo trade, too.Originally posted by Indrid Cold
at the time of the trade it was clear that Kim had more value on the trade market than Hillenbrand. But that's been a pattern for the Diamondbacks...they seem to be willing to trade a player for lesser value just because he's fallen out of favor in the clubhouse or with Brenly and the front office.
I'm going to put that under the tree. That's a Christmas present.Originally posted by moviegeekjn
Most telling is quote from D'backs web site, indicating that BB will be less inclined to make multiple lineup changes in 2004:
NEVER trust the media for this kind of stuff! Like many young pitchers who had always started, this is NO big deal... and all reports indicate that the D'backs had agreed to give BK a chance as a starting pitcher when they first signed him. Reports of BK's attitude have always been filtered by the media, which very well may have misinterpreted BK's intentions and "body language."Originally posted by Indrid Cold
His pouting over becoming a starting pitcher suddenly seemed to disappear once he went to Boston. I can remember him saying in one of his first Boston interviews that he would do whatever the Red Sox wanted him to do, start or go to the bullpen. That sure was a different attitude than the one he displayed in his last year with Arizona.