Cold Hard Football Facts: Warner is the clear choice for 2008 NFL MVP (from SI)..

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,610
Reaction score
948
Location
Needles, Ca.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/football/nfl/11/05/chff/index.html

"He's fresh off a classic Warner performance in Arizona's 34-13 win over St. Louis, a team that, in a tender bit of irony, probably prays for a QB of his caliber each Sunday. Warner completed 23 of 34 passes for 342 yards, two TDs, zero INTs and a 120.0 passer rating.

He's on pace to pass for 4,862 yards, and if he maintains that clip it would be second only to Dan Marino's 5,048-yard season in 1984. Interestingly, Warner currently holds the No. 2 spot, with his 4,830 yards in 2001. (We should note that Saints QB Drew Brees is on pace for 5,126 passing yards this year.)

Warner is also:

• Second in the NFL in TD passes (16)

• Second in passer rating (104.2)

• First in completion percentage (69.9), a mark that puts him in position to challenge the single-season record set by Ken Anderson in 1982 (70.6 percent)."
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,324
Reaction score
68,318
I can't believe it, but if he continues anywhere even close to that pace and we win 10 games, the dude's absolutely the MVP.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,507
Reaction score
14,671
I can't believe it, but if he continues anywhere even close to that pace and we win 10 games, the dude's absolutely the MVP.

Don't forget though, if Warner were injured and Leinart started, he would be just as good if not better in the offense.:trout:
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
Don't forget though, if Warner were injured and Leinart started, he would be just as good if not better in the offense.:trout:

No, I think we'd be just as good in the win total.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,507
Reaction score
14,671
No, I think we'd be just as good in the win total.

Debatable. I see Warner as the Steve Nash of the offense, the straw that stirs the drink. The entire offense right now is tailored to Warner's strengths and is built around him...if Kurt goes down, who knows what happens?
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
The amazing thing about Warner's performance this year isn't that he's accurate and putting up big yards, it's that (save for the Jets game) he isn't turning the ball over.

Those of us that wanted Leinart to start never doubted Warner could still throw the football, but rather that he could hang on to it and not throw costly interceptions.

Kudos to Warner!
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
The amazing thing about Warner's performance this year isn't that he's accurate and putting up big yards, it's that (save for the Jets game) he isn't turning the ball over.

Those of us that wanted Leinart to start never doubted Warner could still throw the football, but rather that he could hang on to it and not throw costly interceptions.

Kudos to Warner!

Ding Ding Ding!

Credit goes to Warner and Wiz/Haley as well!
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,882
Reaction score
4,803
Location
Iowa
The amazing thing about Warner's performance this year isn't that he's accurate and putting up big yards, it's that (save for the Jets game) he isn't turning the ball over.

Those of us that wanted Leinart to start never doubted Warner could still throw the football, but rather that he could hang on to it and not throw costly interceptions.

Kudos to Warner!

On the 4th and goal sneak at St.Louis you could see the Rams desperately trying to jerk the ball out of Kurt's grasp with him hanging on for dear life. I know it was 4th down and the ball goes over, but all it would have taken was the ball being jerked out and some defender going 99 yards for a Ram touchdown.

He'll get blindsided and fumble at some point this season, but the thing I've noticed most in the past few weeks is his improved pocket presence. When the pressure gets close, he has been sliding in the pocket to buy time to get the pass off.
 

Cards232

Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
230
Reaction score
0
Frankly folks, I think his lack of fumbles have more to do w/ the play of the o-line than anything else. His first couple of years here, he was getting pummeled on a regular basis. He had no where near the time to throw that he does now. When you are getting shellacked by 300+ lb lineman, often coming in untouched, one is bound to cough up the ball frequently.

Remember, one of the things that makes Kurt so great is his focus down the field to find the open receiver. That makes for a lot of great plays, but it also opens substantial possibilities for fumbles when protection breaks down early. Rushers can swat at the ball at chest level just as well as a ball at your waist. Warner has the ability to play w/ hornets swarming around him. The difference this year is that he has that split second longer to get rid of the ball before the hornets land.

BTW, on a side note, if you look at photos you'll notice that Kurt is always in perfect balance. That's a far bigger deal than what most people would think. You'll also notice that he takes very short steps so that he can keep that balance at all times.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
Frankly folks, I think his lack of fumbles have more to do w/ the play of the o-line than anything else. His first couple of years here, he was getting pummeled on a regular basis. He had no where near the time to throw that he does now. When you are getting shellacked by 300+ lb lineman, often coming in untouched, one is bound to cough up the ball frequently.
The stats tell a different story. He wasn't getting hit more than a lot of other QBs, but was putting the ball on the ground at a MUCH higher rate.

Credit to Warner for successfully addressing this shortcoming in his game. He's hanging on to the ball better.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,571
Reaction score
38,810
Debatable. I see Warner as the Steve Nash of the offense, the straw that stirs the drink. The entire offense right now is tailored to Warner's strengths and is built around him...if Kurt goes down, who knows what happens?

Yes but Nash hurts the defense, and in the past Warner did too with all the turnovers. This year save the Jets game he's not doing that, so it's like Nash suddenly learned to guard his man.

:D
 

bratwurst

on double secret probation
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,940
Reaction score
1
Location
Santo Poco
OK getting WAY TOO FAR ahead of ourselves here, IF Warner wins the MVP and we win a superbowl, does he enter the hall of fame as a Ram or a Card?
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,503
Reaction score
2,319
Location
ASFN
OK getting WAY TOO FAR ahead of ourselves here, IF Warner wins the MVP and we win a superbowl, does he enter the hall of fame as a Ram or a Card?
Lets decide after the SB win!
 

Treefiddy

Richard Cranium
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Posts
708
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ
OK getting WAY TOO FAR ahead of ourselves here, IF Warner wins the MVP and we win a superbowl, does he enter the hall of fame as a Ram or a Card?

I thought it was already discussed on the board that NFL players don't enter the HoF as a member of any team. Either way, his performance in St.Louis and Arizona would be the ones that get him into the HoF, so no matter what, his time here will always be remembered.

As for the topic of his stats. I don't see him keeping up in the stat department. I think we'll see a major drop off with the move from Edge to Hightower. The running game will see more yardage come their way, and as a result, there will be less yardage and gametime for Warner to keep his stats on the same pace.

As long as the team is still winning, that's all I care about. Give Brees the MVP. I'm content in knowing that the Cardinals would kick the Saints asses if we had to play them.
 

Cards232

Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
230
Reaction score
0
I thought it was already discussed on the board that NFL players don't enter the HoF as a member of any team. Either way, his performance in St.Louis and Arizona would be the ones that get him into the HoF, so no matter what, his time here will always be remembered.

As for the topic of his stats. I don't see him keeping up in the stat department. I think we'll see a major drop off with the move from Edge to Hightower. The running game will see more yardage come their way, and as a result, there will be less yardage and gametime for Warner to keep his stats on the same pace.

As long as the team is still winning, that's all I care about. Give Brees the MVP. I'm content in knowing that the Cardinals would kick the Saints asses if we had to play them.

Actually, I see it quite differently. W/ the advance of the running game, teams won't be keep their lb's & safties as deep which will further open up the passing game & the YPC. Much like in St. Louis. Think of what Kurt has been able to do w/o a running game. He might end up w/ 5000 yards this season w/ one.
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,960
Reaction score
4,143
Location
annapolis, md
The stats tell a different story. He wasn't getting hit more than a lot of other QBs, but was putting the ball on the ground at a MUCH higher rate.

Credit to Warner for successfully addressing this shortcoming in his game. He's hanging on to the ball better.
IIRC though, Leinart has a higher fumble rating than Warner.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,477
Reaction score
25,391
I thought it was already discussed on the board that NFL players don't enter the HoF as a member of any team. Either way, his performance in St.Louis and Arizona would be the ones that get him into the HoF, so no matter what, his time here will always be remembered.

Agreed. The biggest decision for an NFL player is who will introduce them. For Warner, I'm certain Dick Vermiel would be that guy.

The interesting question is, who would Aeneas Williams pick to talk about him?
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,301
Reaction score
1,175
Location
SE Valley
Agreed. The biggest decision for an NFL player is who will introduce them. For Warner, I'm certain Dick Vermiel would be that guy.

The interesting question is, who would Aeneas Williams pick to talk about him?
The person doing the introduction does not have to have any affiliation with the NFL. As I recall, there have been some players have their sons introduce them...
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
IIRC though, Leinart has a higher fumble rating than Warner.
I thought Warner's was far an away higher than anyone else's.

EDIT: I looked up the thread in which there was a lengthy discussion of TOs at the start of the year. The TO discussion begins in earnest at post #87.

http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/f4/quarterback-decision-looms-117167-10.html?highlight=%22warner+fumbles%22

joeshmo said:
In 2006 and 2007 -

Warner threw the ball 619 times and got sacked at a rate of 5.49% (34 sacks / 619 attempts). He fumbled the ball at a rate of 64.71% (22 fumbles / 34 sacks).

Compare that to Matt who threw the ball 489 times and got sacked at a rate of 5.11% (25 sacks / 489 attempts). He fumbled the ball at a rate of 32% (8 fumbles / 25 sacks).
 
Last edited:

Spielman

Non-Troll Rams Fan
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Posts
767
Reaction score
0
Actually, I see it quite differently. W/ the advance of the running game, teams won't be keep their lb's & safties as deep which will further open up the passing game & the YPC. Much like in St. Louis. Think of what Kurt has been able to do w/o a running game. He might end up w/ 5000 yards this season w/ one.

Incredibly tough to do, even though he's on pace for 4800+. Also, the more they run, the more the game shortens, since the clock stops on incompletes.

Of course, considering Warner's completion percentage, that may not matter all that much. :lol:

Still, I doubt Warner or Brees makes it to 5000 this year. In all likelihood, neither one of those guys will be quite as prolific in the second half, even assuming they both stay healthy.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,494
Reaction score
57,814
Location
SoCal
The amazing thing about Warner's performance this year isn't that he's accurate and putting up big yards, it's that (save for the Jets game) he isn't turning the ball over.

Those of us that wanted Leinart to start never doubted Warner could still throw the football, but rather that he could hang on to it and not throw costly interceptions.

Kudos to Warner!

BINGO!

Go Kurt, go kurt, go-go, go kurt!
 

cardsfanmd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Posts
13,960
Reaction score
4,143
Location
annapolis, md

Cards232

Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
230
Reaction score
0
Incredibly tough to do, even though he's on pace for 4800+. Also, the more they run, the more the game shortens, since the clock stops on incompletes.

Of course, considering Warner's completion percentage, that may not matter all that much. :lol:

Still, I doubt Warner or Brees makes it to 5000 this year. In all likelihood, neither one of those guys will be quite as prolific in the second half, even assuming they both stay healthy.

Good points, but remember what Warner did the second half of last year. Also, some feel that the new found ground game w/ Hightower may effect Kurt's #'s, well, if I'm not mistaken, Warner threw 34 times last game, while they ran 33 times, & he still threw for 342 yards after a poor start in the 1st q.

If the running game improves, so will Warner's. Mark my words.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,171
Posts
5,405,836
Members
6,316
Latest member
Dermadent
Top