SissyBoyFloyd
Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Conner or Edmonds - if we only could keep 1 for some reason next season, which do you think makes the most sense?
Easier to get Conner cheaper? He may have 20tds by end of year he won’t be cheap.I voted Conner because a lot of bigger backs are stiffs. The Cardinals can find a lot of players who do what Edmonds does.
I also think it might be easier to get Conner for cheaper.
After everything he's been through in his life he's going to want/deserve to get paid.Easier to get Conner cheaper? He may have 20tds by end of year he won’t be cheap.
I agree Conner is the choice but Chase YPC is just stellar. Its not easy to find and replace that imo.
This is the correct answer.Conner, mainly because Edmonds skills are more replaceable.
Cost and age will be a concern. Cost because he is a RB but might get significant offers and age because of the length of a contract for a RB.We won't be able to afford Conner next year as much as I would want to keep him. I think the Cardinals learned that you can't pay big money for a RB.