This thread is ridiculous. Devin Booker has improved at a rate as good as any player and yet you are basing whether he should be traded on the team. He hasn't had a good team, let alone a consistent one around him in his ENTIRE career.
Then I hear "Trade him if we are bottom THIRD of the NBA next summer." My God, that is almost CERTAINLY what is going to happen next summer and we want to trade him when he has 4 years left on a max deal? Yeah, first, not many teams will go for that. Don't be fooled by the Paul George trade. And second, in order to build a team, you have to start somewhere. Booker is a pretty good piece to start with. And let's face it, people, this team only STARTED to be built last summer. We can moan about it being 10 years, but we can all agree that the "rebuild" put in place by McDonough was an abject failure. THIS is the real rebuild right here. And signing Booker to the max deal was step number 2 (after drafting Ayton).
I generally agree with this. However, if Booker wants out and let's say we could get an equal caliber PF in return? I wouldn't mind making that trade. Would I like to hang on to Booker and see him right this out? Sure. Having said that I can't blame Booker if he runs out of patience and I certainly wouldn't advocate trading him without equal value. It doesn't make much sense to trade a legitimate cornerstone of your franchise.