boondockdrunk
Resident Drunkard
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Posts
- 1,582
- Reaction score
- 40
Deadline update: Still stagnant
With Friday’s non-waiver trade deadline approaching, it still sounds like the Diamondbacks aren’t anticipating any deals.
Part of this is a lack of motivation on their part, at least when it comes to closer Chad Qualls, who won’t be eligible for free agency until after next season. Part of it is a lack of genuine interest from other teams in pitchers Doug Davis and Jon Garland.
From what we’re hearing, there aren’t a lot of teams clamoring for Davis or Garland, despite their names popping up in several reports in recent days. And the teams that have inquired haven’t made an offer the Diamondbacks consider intriguing.
The Diamondbacks apparently are not asking for other teams’ high-end prospects – more like the bottom half a top 10 list – but they are keeping 2010 in mind, particularly with Brandon Webb’s situation is up in the air. With Garland, there’s a 2010 option. With Davis, if they deal him they lose that exclusive negotiating window.
As for Qualls, ESPN’s Buster Olney explained the Diamondbacks’ position pretty well in his blog this morning.
His main points:
*The Diamondbacks want to compete in 2010 and dealing Qualls creates a major hole in the bullpen.
*They don’t normally spend a lot of money on free-agent relievers.
*If they fall out of contention next year, they can try to move him before next year’s deadline.
A couple of points we’d like to add:
*Qualls isn’t going to be expensive next season, probably somewhere in the $4 million range, so he’ll be an affordable and proven commodity as a closer.
*He most likely is going to rank as a Type A reliever, meaning he would bring back two draft picks if/when he departs via free agency. That makes the Diamondbacks’ asking price for him even higher, so it’s not surprising the Diamondbacks’ have yet to be blown away by an offer yet.
http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/NickPiecoro/58790
Last edited: