Deone at linebacker

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I think you are a bit harsh on Deone Bucannon, just like you were initially very harsh on DWash as well.

I think he's been a decent ILB in run down situations, and decent in pass coverage. He's a plus player inside the box against the run, and he isn't overwhelmed playing around larger players.

Where I get concerned is that he almost never (or is it never) makes any plays other than tackles.

I challenge you to key only on Deone on Sunday and say that you believe this.

As a linebacker, he's a good in-the-box safety. But as a linebacker he's pretty consistently overwhelmed. It doesn't show up on the stat sheet, but he's frequently shooting the wrong gap or getting pushed aside.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,138
Reaction score
8,049
Location
Scottsdale
I challenge you to key only on Deone on Sunday and say that you believe this.

As a linebacker, he's a good in-the-box safety. But as a linebacker he's pretty consistently overwhelmed. It doesn't show up on the stat sheet, but he's frequently shooting the wrong gap or getting pushed aside.

I think Deone is generally doing a solid job in a situation that is simply not ideal...
Was at the Monday Night game and I did key on him a lot. There were plenty of times where he was completely taken out of a play by an o-lineman. Which, really isn't that surprising to me given the size differential. He was simply no match for an o-lineman.

I would love to see him play more of a traditional SS role where we actually have a more legit ILB instead of a converted safety who was rarely, if ever used as a fulltime ILB prior to entering the NFL...
 

LittleDavis

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Posts
1,157
Reaction score
343
Location
Champaign-Urbana, Illinois
I can't believe i am saying this...i agree with Kerouac 100%.

We have a very good ILB on the bench. Something is off...I played ILB and Deone is not playing well. A lot of the Pass Rush should be coming from an ILB blowing up a guard and center on the blitz...we don't have this type of player on the field. It is actually frustrating to watch our D at times.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
In 2014? Sure.

In 2015? I have yet to see him get exposed in coverage.

A lot of those screen passes against the Ravens were designed to take advantage of the fact that Bucannon only plays in one direction — downhill. The first big pass to Martavis Bryant was possible because Bucannon didn't get a deep enough drop on his zone coverage.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,075
Reaction score
39,027
Location
Las Vegas
He is much more a liability in coverage than Wilson was early on in his career.

I would have to say that's some revisionist history. Wilson was maddening in his first 3 years... He was pretty bad at times...
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Safety to ILB? I think Urlacher did ok.

He did but he also weighed 40 some pounds more that Bucannon's listed weight. Forget what the actual weight difference is, simply know it is significant.

Can Bucannon put on 20 to 30 more pounds and retain his speed and agility?
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,430
Reaction score
68,612
He did but he also weighed 40 some pounds more that Bucannon's listed weight. Forget what the actual weight difference is, simply know it is significant.

Can Bucannon put on 20 to 30 more pounds and retain his speed and agility?

Urlacher was also a complete freak of nature and had 3 inches on Buc. Expecting Buc to be able to approximate anything a HOF level player did is asking for the moon, IMO.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Urlacher was also a complete freak of nature and had 3 inches on Buc. Expecting Buc to be able to approximate anything a HOF level player did is asking for the moon, IMO.

Urlacher was a freak of nature. I remember reading an article on him and he said that as he kept lifting weights and adding pound he also was getting faster and faster. I'm guessing that isn't typical, at least at the rate it occurred for him.

Not saying Bucannon can become the next Urlacher but if he is staying at ILBer he needs to add some weight and hopefully retain his current speed and agility.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
We have been ranked pretty good against TEs this year and have a major test with the Barnidge guy coming up unless McCown does not play because it seems to be his outlet guy... maybe the Cannon is the reason we are better against TEs so far :)
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
Urlacher was never a SS full time he was used in a hybrid defense at NM he was like a LB/SS they pretty much lined him up everywhere because he was such a great talent.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
Buccanon is tied for 18th in the league in tackles ahead of guys like(I know some have had bye weeks) Laurainaitis, Stephone Anthony, Jamie Collins, Bobby Wagner, and Sean Lee. He's doing just fine.

I trust the Cards staff is happy with his play no matter how many times K9, or anyone else, watches NFL rewind.
 
Last edited:

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
Buccanon is tied for 18th in the league in tackles ahead of guys like(I know some have had bye weeks) Laurainaitis, Stephone Anthony, Jamie Collins, Bobby Wagner, and Sean Lee. He's doing just fine.

I trust the Cards staff is happy with his no play no matter how many times K9, or anyone else, watches NFL rewind.


The kid is a stud and I'm very happy we drafted him.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
It was a terrible draft pick at the time and it remains a terrible draft pick.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I challenge you to key only on Deone on Sunday and say that you believe this.

As a linebacker, he's a good in-the-box safety. But as a linebacker he's pretty consistently overwhelmed. It doesn't show up on the stat sheet, but he's frequently shooting the wrong gap or getting pushed aside.

This.

He isn't playing position well. He makes minimal impact
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
It was a terrible draft pick at the time and it remains a terrible draft pick.

I'm not quite ready to say this — we don't have to decide to pick up his option for another year and a half, and it's hard to say that about a guy who's effectively a starter for his first 20-plus games. But...

Who do you think the Cards should've taken instead? They would've had to exercise that pick at some point. Dee Ford has started 0 games for the Chiefs, has 1.5 sacks, and is only playing on 21% of the Kansas City snaps.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,666
Reaction score
38,955
I'm not quite ready to say this — we don't have to decide to pick up his option for another year and a half, and it's hard to say that about a guy who's effectively a starter for his first 20-plus games. But...

Who do you think the Cards should've taken instead? They would've had to exercise that pick at some point. Dee Ford has started 0 games for the Chiefs, has 1.5 sacks, and is only playing on 21% of the Kansas City snaps.

Ford was off the board, we would have had to trade up to get him.

In hindsight if you were going to trade up it would be to get Mack, Donald or Anthony Barr, all guys who would have helped our pass rush. I'm still not sure what the hell the Vikings are thinking with Barr, I've seen bits and pieces of their games and they drop him into coverage WAY too much, yes he can cover, but his biggest value is as a pass rusher they appear to be completely misusing him.

Mack looks like a complete stud and Donald is unreal. not sure it was realistic to get Mack getting up that high was probably too steep a price. Donald going 13th looks like a total steal now.

But for me it looks like the real value in that draft was the first 18 picks or so, trading up was probably our best chance to get a bigger impact guy.

I like Deonne but I agree so far we don't know what he is, he's not done anything to suggest he really is a S, maybe he would if he played there but he doesn't look like he's going to be very good in coverage.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Ford was off the board, we would have had to trade up to get him.

In hindsight if you were going to trade up it would be to get Mack, Donald or Anthony Barr, all guys who would have helped our pass rush. I'm still not sure what the hell the Vikings are thinking with Barr, I've seen bits and pieces of their games and they drop him into coverage WAY too much, yes he can cover, but his biggest value is as a pass rusher they appear to be completely misusing him.

Mack looks like a complete stud and Donald is unreal. not sure it was realistic to get Mack getting up that high was probably too steep a price. Donald going 13th looks like a total steal now.

But for me it looks like the real value in that draft was the first 18 picks or so, trading up was probably our best chance to get a bigger impact guy.

I like Deonne but I agree so far we don't know what he is, he's not done anything to suggest he really is a S, maybe he would if he played there but he doesn't look like he's going to be very good in coverage.

Not before we traded down.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I'm not quite ready to say this — we don't have to decide to pick up his option for another year and a half, and it's hard to say that about a guy who's effectively a starter for his first 20-plus games. But...

Who do you think the Cards should've taken instead? They would've had to exercise that pick at some point. Dee Ford has started 0 games for the Chiefs, has 1.5 sacks, and is only playing on 21% of the Kansas City snaps.

I hated so much of that draft. Watching Mosley and Shazier both go and not making any attempt to leap ahead of the Steelers and Ravens.

But really I thought we needed a young QB and two guys I really liked were there not once but twice in Bridgewater and Carr.

Had we taken one of them, god knows what would have happened last year.

Several guys went after Bucannon but on the defensive side I liked Stephon Tuitt and Kony Ealy.

Man outside of John Brown that draft sucks...

Bucannon

Niklas

Kareem Martin

Logan Thomas

Ed Stinson

Walt Powell
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,666
Reaction score
38,955
I hated so much of that draft. Watching Mosley and Shazier both go and not making any attempt to leap ahead of the Steelers and Ravens.

But really I thought we needed a young QB and two guys I really liked were there not once but twice in Bridgewater and Carr.

Had we taken one of them, god knows what would have happened last year.

Several guys went after Bucannon but on the defensive side I liked Stephon Tuitt and Kony Ealy.

Man outside of John Brown that draft sucks...

Bucannon

Niklas

Kareem Martin

Logan Thomas

Ed Stinson

Walt Powell


Living in the Bay area Carr and Mack are the guys I watch and think I wish we had them. I don't think we could have gotten up high enough to get Mack. I agree on Mosley, not so high on Shazier I just don't think he's big enough and will always have injury issues.

I love Palmer but yes if we had a kid like Carr last year could have been so much better when the injuries happened.

I really like Carr with QB's getting over picked regularly I'm amazed he didn't go in the first round. I'm not a big Bridgewater fan I think he's ok but I think Carr has better upside.

Really does look like a poor draft for us so far.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,782
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I hated so much of that draft. Watching Mosley and Shazier both go and not making any attempt to leap ahead of the Steelers and Ravens.

But really I thought we needed a young QB and two guys I really liked were there not once but twice in Bridgewater and Carr.

Had we taken one of them, god knows what would have happened last year.

Several guys went after Bucannon but on the defensive side I liked Stephon Tuitt and Kony Ealy.

Man outside of John Brown that draft sucks...

Bucannon

Niklas

Kareem Martin

Logan Thomas

Ed Stinson

Walt Powell

I like Stinson, but the other side of that coin is that can you imagine the 2014 Arizona Cardinals defense without Deone Bucannon playing more than 65% of the defensive snaps at linebacker? We couldn't cover TEs with Bucannon that season (27th in DVOA against) — can you imagine if our only ILB options were one-armed Kevin Minter and old-as-frick Larry Foote?

Kony Ealy hasn't really set the world on fire, either. I don't know. I think that Bucannon is a fine professional football player, but people who think he's a stud or a star or something seem to have a pretty broad understanding of what that means. To me, stars should make big plays sometimes.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,686
Posts
5,410,706
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top