One of the problems the Suns face in examining trades is that they have so little usable depth. Most "popular" trade scenerios end up leaving the Suns with no depth and no way to deal with it.
Let me take one proposal. Trade Marion, Thomas, Barbosa and picks for Garnett. From a "value" standpoing, it makes sense. KG is really that good and there is no doubt that teaming Amare, Nash and KG would be incredible.
So go for it? Not so fast.
The lineup the Suns would have is:
KG, Stoudemire, Jones, Bell, and Nash
OK, looks good, but then who comes off the bench? Diaw and...
Even if you assume the Suns can sign Hill and it is hardly a sure thing, it is still not much of a bench. There would be no backup PG even at the level of Leandro and very little offense off the bench. Without Hill, the rotation would have to include Banks, Pike or some minimum salary guys.
This is not a knock on the value of KG, but rather the core issue that comes from not developing trading pieces. I'm not dumping on the Suns for not wanting to put effort into developing guys they don't believe in. But there is no doubt that it really limits what they can do from a trade standpoint.
When the Suns traded Hornacek, Lang, and Perry for Barkley; they had not stripped the team bare. Some of the guys they had remaining on their roster included: KJ, Majerle, Chambers, Ceballos, West, Negele Knight, and Jerrod Mustaf. Plus, they had the where with all to add Oliver Miller, Richard Dumas, and Danny Ainge.
This was before I moved to Phoenix so I don't remember how all this came together. But it seems obvious that they have a lot more usable depth 92-93 than anything this year's team projects even after they made a three for one trade.
I'm not sure what can be done about the depth problem. It is compounded by the Suns current LT problem. But any trade proposal has to look at the resulting rotation and not just the starting lineup.
Let me take one proposal. Trade Marion, Thomas, Barbosa and picks for Garnett. From a "value" standpoing, it makes sense. KG is really that good and there is no doubt that teaming Amare, Nash and KG would be incredible.
So go for it? Not so fast.
The lineup the Suns would have is:
KG, Stoudemire, Jones, Bell, and Nash
OK, looks good, but then who comes off the bench? Diaw and...
Even if you assume the Suns can sign Hill and it is hardly a sure thing, it is still not much of a bench. There would be no backup PG even at the level of Leandro and very little offense off the bench. Without Hill, the rotation would have to include Banks, Pike or some minimum salary guys.
This is not a knock on the value of KG, but rather the core issue that comes from not developing trading pieces. I'm not dumping on the Suns for not wanting to put effort into developing guys they don't believe in. But there is no doubt that it really limits what they can do from a trade standpoint.
When the Suns traded Hornacek, Lang, and Perry for Barkley; they had not stripped the team bare. Some of the guys they had remaining on their roster included: KJ, Majerle, Chambers, Ceballos, West, Negele Knight, and Jerrod Mustaf. Plus, they had the where with all to add Oliver Miller, Richard Dumas, and Danny Ainge.
This was before I moved to Phoenix so I don't remember how all this came together. But it seems obvious that they have a lot more usable depth 92-93 than anything this year's team projects even after they made a three for one trade.
I'm not sure what can be done about the depth problem. It is compounded by the Suns current LT problem. But any trade proposal has to look at the resulting rotation and not just the starting lineup.
Last edited: