Here is the thing, it is not like they are counting on Duke or Nady to be Lee or Crawford. Duke is going to be our 4th or 5th starter. If he can give us 175+ innings of decent ball then it is a good move. Last year we pretty much played without a left fielder so if Nady can give us anything then that is a win.
AZ, respect what you're saying here and I appreciate where you're going here. However, I would like to respectfully agree and disagree so to speak.
By all means, I understand Towers bringing these guys in to be low risk, high reward potential guys. With most of the signings they've made in the last two - three years, I keep it grounded and I keep my expectations in check.
I'm not expecting Carl Crawford with Nady.. I'm sure as HELL not expecting Cliff Lee with Zack Duke. Problem is, I've seen enough of Duke to know, not only is he not going to be Cliff Lee, at this point, I'd question whether he'd pass for an upgrade over Rodrigo Lopez. I honestly see nothing of value out of Duke, he's a guy who was given many opportunities to show his mettle and he's flunked out. Yes, I realize the Pirates suck the huge one, but that excuse can only carry water so long. Eventually, you have to look at #1. Duke doesn't have the makeup to be a starter on the MLB level.
Nady? I have a little higher view on him than Duke, but I expect very little.
Like I said, I don't expect Pujols Jr. or Felix Hernandez here. I at minimum hope for the Diamondbacks to sign guys I feel confident will at least be on the 40 man roster come Opening Day. I feel this with neither.
And look at my past history here. I'm the biggest eternal optimist saying this.