Diaw or Thomas?

Which would have been better to give up?

  • Thomas, 2008 pick, 2010 pick

    Votes: 12 50.0%
  • Diaw, no picks

    Votes: 12 50.0%

  • Total voters
    24

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,470
Reaction score
9,649
Location
L.A. area
Setting aside the question of what Seattle might or might not have agreed to, which trade would have put the Suns in a better position for the next few years?

1. Trade Kurt Thomas ($8.1 million, expiring 2008 ), 2008 pick, 2010 pick for nothing, saving money this year and potentially freeing up money to use on MLE players over the next few summers.

2. Trade Boris Diaw ($9 million, expiring 2012) and no picks for nothing, saving a little more money this year and in future years, freeing up much more money, but losing a potential future rotation player.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,851
I'm sure Seattle didn't want Diaw, and the extra 4 years.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I still like Boris, I guess.

It's worth noting that Boris is a carbon copy of Jeff Green.
 

Griffin

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Posts
3,726
Reaction score
1
Location
EU
That of course depends on which Diaw we would be trading. As it is, I think I'd rather hang on to Boris since KT would have been gone anyway next summer and we would not sign anyone to replace him. I still have some hope that Diaw will be a significant player on this team. Losing the two picks hurts obviously, but like others have noted, we would have probably lost those picks anyway one way or another.
 

fordronken

Registered User
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Posts
3,806
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles area
This is a really tough question. On one hand, if we trade Diaw, Thomas would still only get about 20 minutes a night. On the other hand, if Diaw still sucks next year, it'd be great to get his contract off the books, plus Thomas would come off the cap and we'd have a lot of money to play with. I voted for Diaw, only because if we don't win the title this year, we'd be in a much better situation to be able to win one in the year afterward.

That being said, if Diaw gets good again, the hindsight will be obvious.
 

newfan101

Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Posts
531
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Setting aside the question of what Seattle might or might not have agreed to, which trade would have put the Suns in a better position for the next few years?

1. Trade Kurt Thomas ($8.1 million, expiring 2008 ), 2008 pick, 2010 pick for nothing, saving money this year and potentially freeing up money to use on MLE players over the next few summers.

2. Trade Boris Diaw ($9 million, expiring 2012) and no picks for nothing, saving a little more money this year and in future years, freeing up much more money, but losing a potential future rotation player.

Since were dealing with hypotheticals, I choose 3. Not signing Quentin Richardson, Drafting Andre Iguodala and resigning Joe Johnson to 6 years, 50 million. Sorry, I know people are sick of hearing it, but those decisions back in 2004 were precursor to what's happening now. Instead of having those two on the roster and still being in breathable range of the luxury tax, we’re left with Boris Diaw and no picks in 2008 and 2010. I'm no fan of Sarver, but Brian deserves some of the blame for this predicament.
 

Suns_fan69

Official ASFN Lurker
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Posts
3,639
Reaction score
2,021
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Diaw through 2012 for sure.

Total savings + future cap flexibility (although there is something to be said of a medium range salary for trade flexibility for a serviceable big) tilts it.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,319
Reaction score
68,312
Since were dealing with hypotheticals, I choose 3. Not signing Quentin Richardson, Drafting Andre Iguodala and resigning Joe Johnson to 6 years, 50 million. Sorry, I know people are sick of hearing it, but those decisions back in 2004 were precursor to what's happening now. Instead of having those two on the roster and still being in breathable range of the luxury tax, we’re left with Boris Diaw and no picks in 2008 and 2010. I'm no fan of Sarver, but Brian deserves some of the blame for this predicament.

um, Sarver's responsible for the JJ thing - he wouldn't sign off on the deal. That ain't Bryan's fault. Iggy, yeah, but the JJ thing is what kills us.
 

Maligzar

Registered
Joined
May 9, 2007
Posts
310
Reaction score
0
I think some folks here need to be nice to the Suns and let them borrow their crystal balls
 

Ciani

Registered
Joined
May 4, 2006
Posts
445
Reaction score
0
Location
Hungary
It would be impossible to trade Diaw without draft picks, so that question is not fair. But its good demagougery :)
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,073
Posts
5,405,208
Members
6,316
Latest member
Dermadent
Top