DID YOU KNOW that Dallas is the only team ever to lose a player to injury?

Ed Burmila

Registered
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Posts
2,364
Reaction score
1
Ever. In the history of the NFL, I think. THEY PLAYED WITHOUT TONY ROMO TODAY. That is just unprecedented. Literally has never happened before, a team having an injured player miss a game.

I mean, we're missing six starters on defense and won two games with DREW STANTON, but Dallas was missing Romo so I guess this game didn't even count.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,311
Reaction score
43,350
Location
Colorado
Ever. In the history of the NFL, I think. THEY PLAYED WITHOUT TONY ROMO TODAY. That is just unprecedented. Literally has never happened before, a team having an injured player miss a game.

I mean, we're missing six starters on defense and won two games with DREW STANTON, but Dallas was missing Romo so I guess this game didn't even count.

Romo to Weeden is a bigger drop off then Palmer to Stanton, and even more in the eyes of the national media. we have always had a better roster, but Dallas has looked better winning than we have this year. They are Romo dependent while we have other players to lean on.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Romo to Weeden is a bigger drop off then Palmer to Stanton, and even more in the eyes of the national media. we have always had a better roster, but Dallas has looked better winning than we have this year. They are Romo dependent while we have other players to lean on.

Agree with this. We can win in different ways. We had the punt return to change that game, the bomb to Brown, backup QBs, defensive stops, blocked FG. We are so well coached across the different phases and especially at head coach.
 
Last edited:

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Romo to Weeden is a bigger drop off then Palmer to Stanton, and even more in the eyes of the national media. we have always had a better roster, but Dallas has looked better winning than we have this year. They are Romo dependent while we have other players to lean on.

Agree with this. We can win in different ways. We had the punt return to change that game, the bomb to Brown, backup QBs, defensive stops, blocked FG. We are so we coached across the different phases and especially at head coach.
Feels good to have depth.
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,054
Reaction score
2,999
Location
Arizona
Figured this would happen when the Cards would win. They will be still considered pretenders as Romo wasn't playing. Pretty sad.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,370
Reaction score
5,572
Location
Nashville TN.
Romo to Weeden is a bigger drop off then Palmer to Stanton, and even more in the eyes of the national media. we have always had a better roster, but Dallas has looked better winning than we have this year. They are Romo dependent while we have other players to lean on.

Disagree. Stanton had almost no experience starting games. Dallas also has an awesome run game for Weeden to lean on. We do not.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,525
Reaction score
16,776
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Romo to Weeden is a bigger drop off then Palmer to Stanton, and even more in the eyes of the national media. we have always had a better roster, but Dallas has looked better winning than we have this year. They are Romo dependent while we have other players to lean on.

I really do not agree. They are Murray dependent and he was shut down today :)
 
OP
OP
E

Ed Burmila

Registered
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Posts
2,364
Reaction score
1
I agree, Cowboys are just making excuses. They have the #1 rusher in the league by a mile, it's hard to hear them complain that without Romo they have nothing to lean on.

Drew Stanton and Brandon Weeden are pretty much a wash. What's obvious is that we have better coaching. We schemed to Stanton's limitations whereas the brilliant Jason Garrett apparently just took Weeden and said "OK go make all the throws Romo makes." If Weeden could do that, he wouldn't be a backup.
 

FrustratedFan04

All Star
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
961
Reaction score
23
Disagree. Stanton had almost no experience starting games. Dallas also has an awesome run game for Weeden to lean on. We do not.
This hits the nail right on the head. Jimmy Johnson said this during the halftime show as the reason Cowboys would come back.
 

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
No one mentioning that the same Romo who missed this game, played the majority of the game that they lost to the juggernaut Redskins AT HOME as well. lmao
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
Good. I don't want any credit right now. I hope the media discredits and doubts us all the way to February.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,311
Reaction score
43,350
Location
Colorado
Pro bowl QB to a guy who got cut by Cleveland...hmmm.

Also, look at preseason rankings which generally picked Dallas to be last in their division. No defense in Dallas, and the east was considered a terrible division.

Like it or not, Romo has been a significantly better QB than Palmer. Romo has kept the Dallas Cowboys from being a dumpster fire for years. Romo has made the Cowboys 8-8 with Murray gaining 1000 yards per season. Murray having a better year just makes it easier for Romo to take advantage of defenses. Losing Romo was huge. He covers up all of their warts, and they have a ton. The gap between Romo and Weeden is so much larger than the gap between Palmer and Stanton.

We won a game that we should have vs a team with it's backup QB. I'm not sure why this should be considered an impressive win.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,311
Reaction score
43,350
Location
Colorado
I really do not agree. They are Murray dependent and he was shut down today :)

Lol, no. Murray is benefited by Romo's ability to make plays in the passing game, and keeping the defense back. They are willing to feed the ball to Murray as long as teams keep players out of the box, but once they drop players down Romo makes plays. Romo doesn't need Murray to make plays while Murray needs Romo, which today proved.
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,997
Reaction score
13,868
Location
Albq
We won a game that we should have vs a team with it's backup QB. I'm not sure why this should be considered an impressive win.

Impresssive or not, it sure as heck felt great to win!!

.
 

Hollywood

is part black.
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
1,015
Location
Mesa, Arizona, USA, Planet Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Pro bowl QB to a guy who got cut by Cleveland...hmmm.

Also, look at preseason rankings which generally picked Dallas to be last in their division. No defense in Dallas, and the east was considered a terrible division.

Like it or not, Romo has been a significantly better QB than Palmer. Romo has kept the Dallas Cowboys from being a dumpster fire for years. Romo has made the Cowboys 8-8 with Murray gaining 1000 yards per season. Murray having a better year just makes it easier for Romo to take advantage of defenses. Losing Romo was huge. He covers up all of their warts, and they have a ton. The gap between Romo and Weeden is so much larger than the gap between Palmer and Stanton.

We won a game that we should have vs a team with it's backup QB. I'm not sure why this should be considered an impressive win.

It was impressive to me in the fact that they put their foot on the throat and stepped down to end it. That's not something I'm used to seeing from the Cards. Other than that we should have beat them even if Romo had played so no big deal......well, first win in dallas since '98. That was nice.
 

nashman

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
11,134
Reaction score
8,390
Location
Queen Creek, AZ
Chopper I couldn't disagree more, Murray running wild is why Dallas is doing well romo has been romo for years, until Murray started this season going bananas they were not even in the conversation! Their offense has been balanced which made it good, romo throwing 50+ times equals disaster!
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,645
Reaction score
7,680
Location
Chandler
It was impressive to me in the fact that they put their foot on the throat and stepped down to end it. That's not something I'm used to seeing from the Cards. Other than that we should have beat them even if Romo had played so no big deal......well, first win in dallas since '98. That was nice.

Nicely said Hollywood. Completely agree. :thumbup:
 

Heucrazy

Pretty Prince of Parties
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Posts
8,540
Reaction score
3,491
Location
Reno, NV
Actually every 49er fan I've talked to says that the Drew Stanton Cardinals got lucky and only beat them because of their injuries. No joke. Every single one.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Actually every 49er fan I've talked to says that the Drew Stanton Cardinals got lucky and only beat them because of their injuries. No joke. Every single one.

Their team only put up 10 points today. With all those weapons on offense. 10 points. LOL!!! At home! Hilarious.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,085
Reaction score
3,358
Pro bowl QB to a guy who got cut by Cleveland...hmmm.

Also, look at preseason rankings which generally picked Dallas to be last in their division. No defense in Dallas, and the east was considered a terrible division.

Like it or not, Romo has been a significantly better QB than Palmer. Romo has kept the Dallas Cowboys from being a dumpster fire for years. Romo has made the Cowboys 8-8 with Murray gaining 1000 yards per season. Murray having a better year just makes it easier for Romo to take advantage of defenses. Losing Romo was huge. He covers up all of their warts, and they have a ton. The gap between Romo and Weeden is so much larger than the gap between Palmer and Stanton.

We won a game that we should have vs a team with it's backup QB. I'm not sure why this should be considered an impressive win.

Pretty sure I disagree with the bolded part. If you meant Romo has been better than Palmer over the last 5 years or so I won't argue that point. If you are saying Romo is significantly better than Palmer now then put up your dukes because thems fighting words.

Losing Romo was a huge loss for the Cowboys today and anyone doubting that is flat out wrong. Not sure we still beat them with the pick 6 Palmer through and all the dropped passes. Romo would have completed more passes then Weeden which would have moved the chains more etc etc.

Still a quality win on the road for the Cardinals. 7-1 says a lot considering the wins included the Chargers, Eagles, Cowboys and 49ers.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,525
Reaction score
16,776
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Pretty sure I disagree with the bolded part. If you meant Romo has been better than Palmer over the last 5 years or so I won't argue that point. If you are saying Romo is significantly better than Palmer now then put up your dukes because thems fighting words.

Losing Romo was a huge loss for the Cowboys today and anyone doubting that is flat out wrong. Not sure we still beat them with the pick 6 Palmer through and all the dropped passes. Romo would have completed more passes then Weeden which would have moved the chains more etc etc.

Still a quality win on the road for the Cardinals. 7-1 says a lot considering the wins included the Chargers, Eagles, Cowboys and 49ers.

We would beat them even with Romo and the pick six. This team was getting hype because of the job Murray was doing. To say we lose to Dallas after a 1st quarter pick six because the QB is Romo is totally wrong to me and almost down right laughable. Peyton Manning or Brady, maybe in some deep do do but Romo... really? Romo is not much different than Palmer, and Palmer is less without Ellington and Romo is a lot less without Murray. The number one run offense went up against or D today and lost. Dallas is average and if not, then they would have been world beaters the last five years but it is the same Dallas team which had benefited from an improved running game till they met the run defense from the 'Bowles' of hell lol
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
The long slide back to .500 football is now upon Dallas.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Top