Diggity said:
My point is not that USC isn't a good football team, You have to give credit where credit is due. USC is a dominant team, and have the last 3 years. My point is that any team can rack up offensive stats against Pac 10 teams. Face it no defense in the Pac-10 outside of USC scares anyone. So when you are Reggie Bush and LD White, you'd be licking you lips when you get to conference play because not one single team has any form of a defense. That's why I said the Pac-10 is a joke.
Reggie Bush isn't Hype, but he wouldn't have had the same success in the Big 12, Big 10 or SEC
That is a very common opinion about the Pac 10. But, it is never backed up by the actual draft. The Pac 10 holds up very well against those other conferences in number of guys drafted and where they are drafted. But, they seem to land as many good starters as anyone. Particularly at the skill positions.
For example, Ngata is being called a top ten possible pick, first round for sure, even though he plays DT in a conference with "no form" of defense. The Pac 10 will probably have at least 4 guys drafted in the top 15 or 10. If scouts thought the conference was significantly weaker than the other 3, that just wouldn't happen.
Also, the "bowls" didn't prove much either. Unless you want to say the Pac 10 is competitive with the other conference. Oregon lost. But, they were in FG range to go to OT and their 3rd string QB throws an INT with 30 secs to go trying for the win. USC also lost in the last seconds, one play away from a win. The other teams won.
From top to bottom, I don't think the Pac 10 is as strong as the other conferences. What the Pac 10 lacks is depth behind their top players. But, they land as many top players as any conference.