If "I'ma is code for "I am gonna", what is a "gonna"?
a rare snake
If "I'ma is code for "I am gonna", what is a "gonna"?
Right there with you, brother (about the breaking the fingers part...not sure if I qualify for "white honky elitist").The first time I use "Imma" I'll break my own fingers. Pencil me in with the white honky elitist crowd.
It is just a whole nuther slang term like aint. Big whoop.Right there with you, brother (about the breaking the fingers part...not sure if I qualify for "white honky elitist").
I am convinced the people who don't think he is going to be a good NFL player haven't seen him play multiple games...
I almost never use "ain't", either, although it has slipped out of my mouth on occasion--but usually in jest.It is just a whole nuther slang term like aint. Big whoop.
The first time I use "Imma" I'll break my own fingers. Pencil me in with the white honky elitist crowd.
Cam Newton should give half of his rookie salary to Mike Vick, because if it weren't for him tearing it up this season in the NFL people wouldn't be nearly as excited about another hybrid QB. I am not sold on him at all.
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/word-association/29157/Guess that makes me a white honky elitist,
187 has AW as his avatar, and Fitz on his sig. (just sayin)Bad argument.
I guess he owes the other half to Peyton Manning because he can pass too.
For some reason I get the impression that colour of skin affects how some people evaluate Newton whether that is positively or negatively effecting it.
Bad argument.
I guess he owes the other half to Peyton Manning because he can pass too.
For some reason I get the impression that colour of skin affects how some people evaluate Newton whether that is positively or negatively effecting it.
187 has AW as his avatar, and Fitz on his sig. (just sayin)
what about lol? I don't really use Imma, but I don't see the big deal.I almost never use "ain't", either, although it has slipped out of my mouth on occasion--but usually in jest.
187 was saying Vick is changing all that. He just isn't on our Camwagon. (copyrights reserved)Well and I am saying that it is different for the QB position.
It's basically the same thing JCSunsfan said because people assume that a black QB is automatically an inferior passer and superior runner.
Well and I am saying that it is different for the QB position.
It's basically the same thing JCSunsfan said because people assume that a black QB is automatically an inferior passer and superior runner.
I am pretty sure that Newton would be the undisputed #1 pick if he was white because he would get more credit for his passing and the running would be seen as a nice plus.
I'm from the midwest. I use warsh from time to time.
I think I'd rather pass on Newton for the best defender or OL at #5 and -- if we're dead-set on pining next season on a rookie -- move back into the bottom of the first to get one of the remaining kids.
I'm not saying Newton WON'T be a great pro, I'm just a little gunshy about the Cardinals ability to make that position work and a top-5 pick is a big investment.
Are you confident that the Cards can take the top OL prospect at 5 because I am not at all base don past history. If a guy doesn't score TDs don't waste a top 10 pick on him IMO. Tomlinson instead of L. Davis and All-Day over Levi. Fitz over Gallery the list goes on and on. Newton has much higher upside/ impact than any O-line prospect.