- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,758
- Reaction score
- 16,525
You weren't against drafting Coby from what I recall, but you weren't in favor of him either. I think you were open to the possibility he would be selected and preferred White to Garland but that didn't mean you were excited about it.
I think there were 4 categories discussed outside of trading the pick that everyone fell into.
1. Draft Coby
2. Draft Garland
3. Draft one of wings projected to go around #6 (Hunter, Culver, Reddish)
4. Reach for a PF (Hayes, Rai, Clarke, Washington, other)
Of course some wanted to trade the pick also but it's too hard to guess what the return would be and what trades were out there so everyone came to terms with 1 of those 4 outcomes happening and made their choice as to which they preferred. I think I was one of the only posters who was in the "Draft Coby" camp as my preferred outcome, even more than trading the pick. If I had to guess I'd say most posters were in the 3rd camp followed by #2 and then #1 or #4 being fairly even as the 3rd outcome.
The way it's been discussed since the draft went down though it seems like the "Draft Coby" camp has grown substantially. I don't remember anyone else being that in favor of him though. The Players Tribune piece from the day or two before the draft helped win some people over to the idea of taking him but I don't think he was anyone else's #1 choice.
You're right, I wasn't pushing for White at all but once we traded down for Saric and Cam I found myself questioning the decision to not just take White. But after a few days have passed I realize we made the far safer move and considering the debacle that has been our draft approach since Len, safe makes a lot of sense.
And I agree, the Coby legend has grown considerably since we failed to draft him. I saw a few draft recaps that gave us a failing grade solely (or at least primarily) because we could have had White and I don't think they were all that in love with the player prior to the draft.