the_future23
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2009
- Posts
- 580
- Reaction score
- 15
One of them. PLEASE!!!! Leinart just doesn't have what it takes.
So this loss in on Leinart? You don't think Leinart has what it takes, but you want to draft Tebow or Bradford? The same Bradford that already has had two operations on his throwing arm!One of them. PLEASE!!!! Leinart just doesn't have what it takes.
My goodness people. The defense gave up 500 yards including 99 on the final drive and going 4-4 on 4th down to boot and people are talking about the QB as if he's to blame? Are you ******** me?
Can somebody please call a proctologist to remove the heads from people's asses?
One of them. PLEASE!!!! Leinart just doesn't have what it takes.
I am for drafting a Qb in the first 4 rounds regardless of Leinart's production this year so what side of the fence does that leave me on?
I am for drafting a Qb in the first 4 rounds regardless of Leinart's production this year so what side of the fence does that leave me on?
Edge pass rusher.
Anyone who suggests drafting Tebow shouldn't be taken seriously.
One of them. PLEASE!!!! Leinart just doesn't have what it takes.
Really. What did Matt do so wrong today? I'm curious.
Noodle arm spread QBs? No ****ing thanks, they're all going to be megabusts. The only legitimate NFL prospects in the next couple drafts are Jake Locker, Jimmy Clausen and Ryan Mallet.
A
That said, why would anybody watch today's game and come away sayign draft a QB and not draft LB's, pass rushers and another CB?
Well, by that logic:Didn't put points on the board.
And why would I list Clausen and Lockler? They're Top 10 picks. The Cardinals won't have a Top 10 pick.
This team gave up 500 yards today. The last thing this team needs is a QB. Did you watch the game today? If so how could you say that this team should justify passing on a LB, or DE for a QB? Seriosuly, if the Cards did that it would be a bigger joke than the Raiders draft last year.Except Warner has proven he can put points on the board, while Leinart has not.