Drake 4th in the NFL in Rushing Yards After 6 Weeks

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,139
Reaction score
35,595
Location
BirdGangThing
On his current pace he would hit 1,060. That seems awfully low for top 5. Must be a really off year for rushing.

That would be . . .
14th in 2019
7th in 2018
8th in 2017
11th in 2016
8th in 2015
12th in 2014
12th in 2013
15th in 2012
13th in 2011

so roughly 11th in an average year. Reasonable.


Yeah, outside of Henry and Cook, 3-6 are within 150 yards of each other...Drake is less than 40 yards behind Chubb and 52 behind Jones....and none of the other RB's in the top 15 are basically splitting carries with their QB.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
On his current pace he would hit 1,060. That seems awfully low for top 5. Must be a really off year for rushing.

That would be . . .
14th in 2019
7th in 2018
8th in 2017
11th in 2016
8th in 2015
12th in 2014
12th in 2013
15th in 2012
13th in 2011

so roughly 11th in an average year. Reasonable.
Yeah, in a year with Covid and so many injuries, it's just not insanely impressive.

Don't get me wrong, he's not bad, but we shouldn't be looking at Drake for a huge contract as as a "top five back."
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
It will be interesting to see how the market for Drake develops.

Very interesting. I just don't see people giving him or a majority of backs what the position has gotten in recent pasts till what has happen now. I think we can offer about the same at a decent amount without overspending and Drake actually fits our offense better than most if he wants success
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,363
Reaction score
68,446
Very interesting. I just don't see people giving him or a majority of backs what the position has gotten in recent pasts till what has happen now. I think we can offer about the same at a decent amount without overspending and Drake actually fits our offense better than most if he wants success

yeah, I can’t see anyone breaking the bank for Drake. 8 million per is probably the tops he will ever see and I doubt he gets that much again.

he’s a solid RB. But really does nothing GREAT. That kind of running back doesn’t normally get big deals at this point.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,139
Reaction score
35,595
Location
BirdGangThing
yeah, I can’t see anyone breaking the bank for Drake. 8 million per is probably the tops he will ever see and I doubt he gets that much again.

he’s a solid RB. But really does nothing GREAT. That kind of running back doesn’t normally get big deals at this point.


That's basically Melvin Gordon money...and is probably acceptable...I do think, though, it will take a creative 3 year deal, to re-sign him, based on the cap going down next year (potentially).
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
On his current pace he would hit 1,060. That seems awfully low for top 5. Must be a really off year for rushing.

That would be . . .
14th in 2019
7th in 2018
8th in 2017
11th in 2016
8th in 2015
12th in 2014
12th in 2013
15th in 2012
13th in 2011

so roughly 11th in an average year. Reasonable.

I'm okay with this and bringing him back for this IF we also pick up a rookie planning to replace him and keep edmonds as a change of pace.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
also, chubb missed several weeks and mccaffery missed most the season which obviously makes drakes numbers look better.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,985
Location
UK
Drake has gone from 10th in YPC last year to 29th this year.

I'd pay him 7m per tops and even then he'd have to slim down for me to want him.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,298
Location
Colorado
I think that tag was very sweet for him never being a lead back and if he's in touch with reality, he takes that but then again I do not want own my own island unlike most professional athletes lol
I am sure he will get more than 4, but with where the Cardinals are financially, it is just too easy to replace that productivity at a lower cost. There are a couple situations this offseason where I would pinch pennies and this is one of them.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,245
Reaction score
14,304
I am sure he will get more than 4, but with where the Cardinals are financially, it is just too easy to replace that productivity at a lower cost. There are a couple situations this offseason where I would pinch pennies and this is one of them.

there was something to be said this offseason to bringing back as much certainty around Kyler as possible.

Drake has been good, but not $8mm a year good. If i were GM, i would look for a cheaper alternative -- and that might be Drake at a better contract
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,985
Location
UK
I am sure he will get more than 4, but with where the Cardinals are financially, it is just too easy to replace that productivity at a lower cost. There are a couple situations this offseason where I would pinch pennies and this is one of them.

I agree. Running back is the position where it's easiest to get instant success from a rookie.

I think Kliff is frustrated by the run game this year, it wouldn't surprise me if we threw a high pick at a running back like Etienne even though we have greater needs at CB and Edge.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,465
Location
Charlotte, NC
I agree. Running back is the position where it's easiest to get instant success from a rookie.

I think Kliff is frustrated by the run game this year, it wouldn't surprise me if we threw a high pick at a running back like Etienne even though we have greater needs at CB and Edge.

Why would Kliff be frustrated with the ground game when the Cardinals are 4th in the league?

I'd wager he is much more frustrated by the passing game...
 

sdscard4

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Posts
3,640
Reaction score
2,686
Location
Louisville
Drakes 'bad' year is still pretty damn good. I'm keeping him 1 more year atleast. When healthy hes shown hes a beast
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
Why would Kliff be frustrated with the ground game when the Cardinals are 4th in the league?

I'd wager he is much more frustrated by the passing game...

Maybe because KM accounts for a lot of our rushing amount. If he is unwilling unable to rush the ball, it affects those numbers. Also, we he does run/threaten to run, it opens lanes for the RBs.

I'm not sure he is or should be frustrated. He probably is a bit concerned though.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,462
Reaction score
40,985
Location
UK
Why would Kliff be frustrated with the ground game when the Cardinals are 4th in the league?

I'd wager he is much more frustrated by the passing game...

Because as I've said. Drake is 29th in YPC. He puts us in far more 2nd and 8 situations than Kliff would like.
 
Top