He agrees it's bad for consumers, not that it's a monopoly. That's the only thing I have a problem with--this agreement is not a monopoly. It's not illegal. It's going to make EA a lot of money (your money, probably).ASUCHRIS said:Wedbush Morgan Securities' Pachter agreed.
"It was flat out predatory licensing. [EA is] trying to put other people out of business. No matter what, the consumer has fewer choices and no matter what, they're paying more. There is no $20 option. It goes to $50 next year and stays there. I think consumers lose."
ugh, so annoying.
Pariah said:(your money, probably).