Here you go, Chaplin. Definitive proof that the Suns professional staff thought Payton's hair was affecting his shot:
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Yep. I wonder if we have plans to keep him. McD loves to get everything he can out of every asset.Here you go, Chaplin. Definitive proof that the Suns professional staff thought Payton's hair was affecting his shot:
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Better late than never, I guess. But if that really was the case, why did it take 6 MONTHS for the front office to make him do something about it??Here you go, Chaplin. Definitive proof that the Suns professional staff thought Payton's hair was affecting his shot:
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Want a guess? I think they gave it one month of observation and then told him that if he wanted to resign in Phoenix, the hair had to go. His first game was Feb 10. The conversation happened around the beginning of March. The last month of the season Payton pouted about it and played poorly.Better late than never, I guess. But if that really was the case, why did it take 6 MONTHS for the front office to make him do something about it??
Color me not surprised at all.Bordow said that it had a bearing on whether the Suns would bring Elfrid back or not.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Youre still arguing against this argument despite explicit commments confirming it???Better late than never, I guess. But if that really was the case, why did it take 6 MONTHS for the front office to make him do something about it??
Jesus, it's a question--if you DON'T want to answer it, DON'T REPLY. Pretty simple, isn't it??Youre still arguing against this argument despite explicit commments confirming it???
Give the kid the max!!
That’s fair. I’ll answer . . .Jesus, it's a question--if you DON'T want to answer it, DON'T REPLY. Pretty simple, isn't it??
Rozier isn't a RFA this year is he?I would like to McD put some pressure on Ainge by offering Restricted free agent terry Rozier a nice contract. He fits in with our time table, he is proving himself on a big stage, and Ainge will have to pay Irving $35+ per year...can boston afford it? Somewhere in the 4 yr 55 million range..keep payton as a back up if he wants to stay for 2 yr 10 mill.
A tough spot? He was in a contract year with little competition. Didn’t seem to detract from JJ’s performance.We were tanking at the end of last season, Payton playing poorly then isn't much of a surprise. He didn't do himself any favors with how he played but if he played great and helped win some games would people be happy with his performance? He was in a tough spot.
What? I wasn’t questioning Bordow, I was questioning why this was done now and not when he was acquired, ESPECIALLY if the organization thought his hair affected his play. That’s a pretty relevant question IMO, even if you don’t think it is.That’s fair. I’ll answer . . .
The truth there are myriad reasons for how this played out. Maybe, as JC said, they gave him the benefit of the doubt initially. Or maybe they told him to cut it and he refused and there was a power struggle - which imo would better explain his lame play down the stretch in a contract year verses the “he’s just not motivated” or “it was the tank!” excuses for his play. And now that he’s a FA his agent could be gathering opinions from front offices who are likely saying the same thing that suns front office said. So Elfrid is like “gotta cut the hair to get a job.”
All that said, at the end of the day Bordow, a respected journalist, stated the suns position. You’re continuing to question the veracity intimates that either bordow, or the organization, are lying about this. And there’s just no incentive for either to do so. So i don’t get where your question even comes from and why you don’t just accept that’s the truth.
I got it.What? I wasn’t questioning Bordow, I was questioning why this was done now and not when he was acquired, ESPECIALLY if the organization thought his hair affected his play. That’s a pretty relevant question IMO, even if you don’t think it is.
A tough spot? He was in a contract year with little competition. Didn’t seem to detract from JJ’s performance.
Guess I read your question with the wrong inflection. I think it WAS discussed earlier and it was a point of contention. But that’s conjecture on my part.What? I wasn’t questioning Bordow, I was questioning why this was done now and not when he was acquired, ESPECIALLY if the organization thought his hair affected his play. That’s a pretty relevant question IMO, even if you don’t think it is.
I think we told him we had interest in bringing him back next year but only if he cut his hair AFTER the season was over. Why risk blowing up the tank?
It's a good point but I'm not sure if this factored into Payton's thinking back then. What puzzles me is why he didn't get the haircut before the end of the season so he could better display his skills.
I'm not sure I'm following you? When he was first traded, one of his comments was that he was pretty sure he was going to cut his hair (I think he said after the season but not sure). The Suns got a look at his play and decided it needed to go in order for him to be effective. And we didn't want him to be particularly effective this season.
I'm trying to look at it through Payton's eyes. I'd want to put my best foot forward so to speak going into free agency... not just save it for the Suns. Getting the haircut before the end of the season would seem to benefit him. The Suns are not the only team to consider.
I agree with that but he might have burned the Suns by helping them win a game or two that would have hurt in the tank race. Priority #1 was not winning when Payton was acquired. He played great the first 2-3 weeks here but fell off hard after that. Perhaps he was told to cut his hair then and quit putting forth 100% effort. Everyone could see we were tanking with how many games Booker and Warren missed, as well as Chandler and others. A headache got them listed on the injury report and sat out. So why would he go all out for us when the team wasn't going all out? I know he'd want to get paid but it wouldn't surprise me if something was said to him that caused his game to drop so far. He put up 2 triple doubles right after he came in and was awful for the final month. It was odd.