ESPN Rumors

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
A quick visit to ESPN Insiders reveals (among other rumors that have been posted already)

a) Jamal Lewis to be tagged.
b) Alexander to stay in Seattle
c) NY Jets looking at Jay Cutler at #4
d) Detroit to tag Backus
e) Miami looking at Culpepper. Minnesota now prepared to take a 2nd for him.
 

General Chaos

Gronko = Man Beast
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
934
Reaction score
42
Location
Dallas
Hopefully that Backus rumor isn't true. After all the tagging is done it doesn't look like there will be that many O-Line upgrades in free agency.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
It's all rumors but it all makes sence except for the Jets taking Cutler at 4. IMO that would be a huge reach.

GBR
40
 
OP
OP
S

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
seesred said:
It's all rumors but it all makes sence except for the Jets taking Cutler at 4. IMO that would be a huge reach.

GBR
40

Actually, the Titans are said to be interested in him over Vince Young at #3.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,767
Reaction score
14,682
Location
Chandler, Az
Anyone taking Cutler or Young early in the first round are destined to drafting a bust. These guys will never be able to live up to the hype of being a top draft pick.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
MadCardDisease said:
Anyone taking Cutler or Young early in the first round are destined to drafting a bust. These guys will never be able to live up to the hype of being a top draft pick.

Unless you know something that draft scouts don't, how can you begin to say this?
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,767
Reaction score
14,682
Location
Chandler, Az
spanky1 said:
A quick visit to ESPN Insiders reveals (among other rumors that have been posted already)

a) Jamal Lewis to be tagged
I doubt they tag him.

spanky1 said:
b) Alexander to stay in Seattle
This may be true.

spanky1 said:
c) NY Jets looking at Jay Cutler at #4
I can see the Jets fans already with horrid looks of shock on their face as everyone else at the draft laughs at them.

spanky1 said:
d) Detroit to tag Backus
I doubt it. Backus is way overrated.

spanky1 said:
e) Miami looking at Culpepper. Minnesota now prepared to take a 2nd for him.
Purely a rumor and nothing more. It will never happen.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanky1
A quick visit to ESPN Insiders reveals (among other rumors that have been posted already)

a) Jamal Lewis to be tagged

I doubt they tag him.

They would tag him and then pursue a trade is what I am hearing.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,767
Reaction score
14,682
Location
Chandler, Az
dreamcastrocks said:
Unless you know something that draft scouts don't, how can you begin to say this?

Drafting these guys high forces them to play early because of the amount of money they will be making. Both of these guys are not ready to start and will struggle. This will destroy their confidence and ruin their careers.
 
OP
OP
S

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
dreamcastrocks said:
They would tag him and then pursue a trade is what I am hearing.

This is the speculation....it appears however that they have NO, NADA,ZIP conversations with Chester Taylor, which might mean that they keep him.

The next question is.....would you rather have Lewis at $6MM or Taylor at $3MM.....which will become the heart of the matter.......and I don't have the answer.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,589
Reaction score
5,434
Location
Fort Myers
MadCardDisease said:
Drafting these guys high forces them to play early because of the amount of money they will be making.

Like Palmer, McNair, Culpepper, Pennington and Rivers(who all sat as rookiees despite being high first rounders)? Not true at all. Teams can be patient when necessary.

McNabb didn't play as a rookiee until the Eagles season was in the tubes(I think it was against our Cardinals at SDS too).

Alex Smith was rushed but in his case the 49ers didn't have anything at QB in front of him and they had to know they had a bad team.
 

Bobcat

Registered User
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
1,969
Reaction score
2
Location
Glendale, Arizona
Has anyone ever considered that Vince Young could develope into another "Q...??? Yes; he could be our third wideout. Just think what he could do with the rock after he catches it...??? Just something for you guy's to chew on.

Bobcat
 

Redrage

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 4, 2003
Posts
1,008
Reaction score
65
Location
Charlotte, NC
Bobcat said:
Has anyone ever considered that Vince Young could develope into another "Q...??? Yes; he could be our third wideout. Just think what he could do with the rock after he catches it...??? Just something for you guy's to chew on.

Bobcat

You draft him that high it's to play QB.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,388
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Bobcat said:
Has anyone ever considered that Vince Young could develope into another "Q...??? Yes; he could be our third wideout. Just think what he could do with the rock after he catches it...??? Just something for you guy's to chew on.

Bobcat

Why wouldn't you just take McNeill or the guy from Penn State on the second day and get a player that can, like, play his real position from the start?

Just something for you to chew on.
 

Bobcat

Registered User
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
1,969
Reaction score
2
Location
Glendale, Arizona
Redrage said:
You draft him that high it's to play QB.

Not really do you remember last year when a QB from Alabama was a college Qb and he was drafted in the first round to play TE. He turned out to mak th all rookie team. So it is not a stretch for us to take VY and convert him into a WR. Remeber how green drafts "best avaliable player!"

Bobcat.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Bobcat said:
Not really do you remember last year when a QB from Alabama was a college Qb and he was drafted in the first round to play TE. He turned out to mak th all rookie team. So it is not a stretch for us to take VY and convert him into a WR. Remeber how green drafts "best avaliable player!"

Bobcat.

Are you talding about the Arkansas QB that Jacksonville drafted?
 
OP
OP
S

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
Bobcat said:
Not really do you remember last year when a QB from Alabama was a college Qb and he was drafted in the first round to play TE. He turned out to mak th all rookie team. So it is not a stretch for us to take VY and convert him into a WR. Remeber how green drafts "best avaliable player!"

Bobcat.

ARRRRGH......we don't need to use a high draft pick on a player and try to convert him to something he's never been......and furthermore, we don't even need a WR.

This post is preposterous.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Why wouldn't you just take McNeill or the guy from Penn State on the second day and get a player that can, like, play his real position from the start?
Maybe we might. (But I'd substitute Omar Jacobs for Robinson in my thinking).

It depends on how our scouts view Young. Interesting dialog (supported by tape) on NFL Net yesterday between Corey Chavous and Mike Mayock.

Chavous featured examples of Young making throws that aspiring QB's dream of making - keeping the ball away from defenders, throwing to spots well ahead of time, fitting the ball in narrow windows etc.

You can make either case (i.e. that Young lacks the tools and represents a questionmark or that he's shown scouts enough to convince them he's the real deal).

It will all come down to eyeballs watching tape, phone calls to guys he's played with, against and for and coaches talking to and working with Young.

(Note - I have a soft spot in my heart for Corey, and not because he was once a Cardinal. He's the only other draft geek out there - other than me- nutty enough to rate McNeal at or near #1).
 

vinnymac

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Posts
3,022
Reaction score
0
jay cutler will be drafted in the first round. so if you like him then you take him. i can say for a fact if cutler is still there at the number 10 pick, the cardinals will take him.
 
OP
OP
S

spanky1

Registered User
Joined
Jan 6, 2004
Posts
4,713
Reaction score
0
Location
Charlotte NC
vinnymac said:
jay cutler will be drafted in the first round. so if you like him then you take him. i can say for a fact if cutler is still there at the number 10 pick, the cardinals will take him.

You cannot say anything "for a fact".......unless you are either Graves or Green. This is your opinion....which I might add, is not universally shared.
 

vinnymac

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Posts
3,022
Reaction score
0
spanky1 said:
You cannot say anything "for a fact".......unless you are either Graves or Green. This is your opinion....which I might add, is not universally shared.

i can pretty much say whatever i want you big messageboard bully.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,538
Posts
5,407,891
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top