- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 36,756
- Reaction score
- 16,524
I didn't misunderstand--this is exactly what I thought you meant.
It was humor.
I didn't misunderstand--this is exactly what I thought you meant.
As for remakes, Stout, I couldn't care less. I don't need something to be highly original, I just need it to be good. Almost everything seems like a remake to me anyway so I tend to stay away from tired themes but I have no problem if they recycle names. If something feels too derivative it usually loses me fairly quickly. But you can call someone Buffy without the show feeling like a lazy copy. And most remakes do try to establish themselves as a unique property rather than simply a rehashing.
Ecclesiastes 1:9
What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again
there is nothing new under the sun.
Designated Survivor has really hit it out of the park with their last 2 returning episodes. The end of the previous episode was totally out of the blue.
Designated Survivor has really hit it out of the park with their last 2 returning episodes. The end of the previous episode was totally out of the blue.
I'm dropping Timeless now. I decided in the middle of the Nazi/Ian Flemming episode. I'm sorry, but the horrific plot holes, lucky breaks, and glossing over of impossibilities/coincidences was just too much. Good concept, bad writers.
I had watched a couple of episodes on Netflix - it was ok.
I like the Spaniard's version much better "The Ministry of Time" More character driven and with a lot less shoot 'em up, kill 'em up. They use doors instead of a time machine.