farley sign with rams

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,816
Reaction score
9,649
Location
milan-italy
thats a scaring defensive line.we better find an upgrade at center spot in order to save palmer
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,839
Reaction score
40,828
Location
Las Vegas
Dos that really even help them??? Their DL was already scary???
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
Dang! They are putting together a good team. Getting Foles was an AMAZING move for them. Clearing 12 million cap and getting a MUCH better QB. Damn Eagles!
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,294
Reaction score
21,671
Location
South Bay
Do they really need more d-linemen? They need more playmakers.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
13,055
Reaction score
8,149
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
He's going to be tough to deal with in the middle!

You must be registered for see images attach
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
So apparently the new trend in the NFL is to stockpile studs at a single position and make that your teams identity.

Eagles: RB's
Rams: DL
Cowboys: OL

Don't forget the Cards started all this with our WRs over the years (Fitz, Boldin, Breaston, then draft Floyd, etc...!) :D
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,987
Reaction score
31,246
Location
Gilbert, AZ
That's a strange signing. I wonder if Fairley didn't see the market he was expecting and signed a one-year deal.

They already have Aaron Donald and Michael Brockers at DT. That defensive line is going to boast 5 first-round picks!
 

FrustratedFan04

All Star
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
961
Reaction score
23
Before we start to worry, Fairley is a near bust who never met expectations. He's been off the field quite a bit and I'm not even certain he played in 1/2 of the Lions games last year. They cut him for a reason.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,839
Reaction score
40,828
Location
Las Vegas
Before we start to worry, Fairley is a near bust who never met expectations. He's been off the field quite a bit and I'm not even certain he played in 1/2 of the Lions games last year. They cut him for a reason.

I wasn't worried... Even stated by a couple of us that its a Weird signing...
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Dos that really even help them??? Their DL was already scary???

They did need a replacement for Kendell Langford, who they lost to Indy.

Farley is a good player when motivated, but his motivation is lacking from what I have read.

This is potentially a upgrade for the Rams, but if Farley slacks off it won't be.

Langford was a Cardinal killer, he made his living against Fanaika every year.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,523
Reaction score
24,427
Foles is much better than Bradford, who was a hot mess. Foles is a warm mess.

I wouldn't say much better, or better at all if anything. I would say they're both average. We'll see how Foles will do when he has to deal with a much worse OL & WR than in Philly(in which he struggled last season before injury).
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,294
Reaction score
21,671
Location
South Bay
Thinking about this some more---I wonder if they're gonna flip one of them in a trade.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,987
Reaction score
31,246
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Thinking about this some more---I wonder if they're gonna flip one of them in a trade.

That'd be interesting. Brockers is the best candidate--didn't get quite as many sacks last year but has 2 years remaining (with a team option) on his rookie deal.
 

FrustratedFan04

All Star
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
961
Reaction score
23
I'd much rather sign Wisniewski and Barksdale and have a real killer OL with competent back-ups.
 

DoTheDew

Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Posts
2,967
Reaction score
0
Foles is much better than Bradford, who was a hot mess. Foles is a warm mess.

Hard to say. Let's look at their numbers last year.

7 games 159/262 60.7%, 1687 yards, 6.44 YPA, 14 TD, 4 INT, 2 FUM, 90.9 Rating
8 games 186/311 59.8%, 2163 yards, 6.96 YPA, 13 TD, 10 INT, 3 FUM, 81.4 Rating

Who had the better year?
First one is Bradford second if Foles. I'd say the numbers are pretty similar with the edge to Bradford and Foles had better weapons.
 

don7031

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 24, 2014
Posts
1,036
Reaction score
298
^ Bradford was on the injured reserve list all of last year after a second ACL tear on the same knee happened in the third preseason game.
 

HotSauce

Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
189
Reaction score
4
^ Bradford was on the injured reserve list all of last year after a second ACL tear on the same knee happened in the third preseason game.

True. He'd be better than Bradford just by playing in games.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,294
Reaction score
21,671
Location
South Bay
Hard to say. Let's look at their numbers last year.

7 games 159/262 60.7%, 1687 yards, 6.44 YPA, 14 TD, 4 INT, 2 FUM, 90.9 Rating
8 games 186/311 59.8%, 2163 yards, 6.96 YPA, 13 TD, 10 INT, 3 FUM, 81.4 Rating

Who had the better year?
First one is Bradford second if Foles. I'd say the numbers are pretty similar with the edge to Bradford and Foles had better weapons.


Again, go back to 2013. Bradford has never had a season like that. No one is saying Foles is gonna be Peyton, but I can confidently say that Foles has done more in less time and Bradford won't ever top that production.

As a side note---I can tell you guys that Foles did not want to be in Philly anymore, and told those around him that he was relieved when he was traded. Chip's offense was not a fit for him and he wanted something more conventional.
 
Last edited:

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
64,612
Reaction score
31,020
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Nick Fairley arrives in St. Louis weighing a svelte 280

Right now I’m at 280,” Fairley said, via the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “Now that I’m down here I’m gonna be looking for [a personal chef] here.”

Fairley said he’ll weigh more than 280 by the time the season starts.
“I’m gonna put on some muscle, of course,” he said.

The Rams gave Fairley a one-year, $5 million contract that can pay him an additional $3 million in incentives. So if Fairley is injured or out of shape, he’ll make less than he would have made if the Lions had picked up the $5.5 million option on his rookie contract.



But if Fairley plays well, he’ll make more in St. Louis than he would have had the Lions kept him in Detroit. Losing excess body fat is a good step toward being the kind of player the Lions hoped he would be after taking him in the first round of the 2011 NFL draft.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,096
Posts
5,452,442
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top