Film study

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,159
Reaction score
31,678
Location
Scottsdale, Az
So they put the clause in to...humiliate him for no reason? And he and his agent accepted it without complaint why?

According to Rapport, Michael would have put that clause in any players contract of that dollar figure. It wasn't really about Kyler but about Michael protecting his money.

Right after that report came out they rescinded the clause. Like 3 hours later.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
According to Rapport, Michael would have put that clause in any players contract of that dollar figure. It wasn't really about Kyler but about Michael protecting his money.

Right after that report came out they rescinded the clause. Like 3 hours later.
What's really ridiculous is the four hour requirement. It's so pitiful.
 

TRW

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Posts
7,810
Reaction score
7,489
Location
Avondale, AZ
According to Rapport, Michael would have put that clause in any players contract of that dollar figure. It wasn't really about Kyler but about Michael protecting his money.

Right after that report came out they rescinded the clause. Like 3 hours later.
He's an attorney and he knows there is very little he can do to go about "protecting his money". It just shows how arrogant, petty and vindictive MB truly is IMO. The Bidwills might not be on the "Mt. Rushmore" of the worst sports owners in history but they make honorable (maybe dishonorable) mention.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
Not true even a little bit.

It proves that ownership may have that perception. What a great way to make your QB look like an idiot.
Your making the assumption that Murray's game preparation is flawless and his history had nothing to do with the clause. I find it hard to believe that the clause is totally on management and zero, nada is on Murray. I can't wrap my head around the notion that management put that clause in with absolutely no reason at all other than to piss off their QB. Common sense said otherwise.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,159
Reaction score
31,678
Location
Scottsdale, Az
He's an attorney and he knows there is very little he can do to go about "protecting his money". It just shows how arrogant, petty and vindictive MB truly is IMO. The Bidwills might not be on the "Mt. Rushmore" of the worst sports owners in history but they make honorable (maybe dishonorable) mention.

We live in a right to work state but I have a No Compete clause that I had to sign. It likely would never hold up but I still had to do it.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,518
Reaction score
57,858
Location
SoCal
Occam's razor.

A franchise with a century of mostly incompetence.

Why accept it? He has 230 million reasons to accept a pitiful requirement.
Are you just ignoring the genesis of all this? Kylers own comments. We would never have had any of these conversations if not for kylers own comments. The clause likely never exists but for kylers own comments. In court those would likely be considered an admission.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,518
Reaction score
57,858
Location
SoCal
We live in a right to work state but I have a No Compete clause that I had to sign. It likely would never hold up but I still had to do it.
There’s a chasm of difference between your bargaining power and kyler’s. How would a holdout on your part go over with your employer?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
Are you just ignoring the genesis of all this? Kylers own comments.
Nope, not ignoring. I'm just stating that I think it was a gross overreaction by an incompetent owner.
We would never have had any of these conversations if not for kylers own comments. The clause likely never exists but for kylers own comments. In court those would likely be considered an admission.
According to information that came out after the extreme overreaction on this board, the clause had nothing to do with Kyler's comments. Bidwill would put this clause in any contract of that size.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,355
Reaction score
68,426
Nope, not ignoring. I'm just stating that I think it was a gross overreaction by an incompetent owner.

According to information that came out after the extreme overreaction on this board, the clause had nothing to do with Kyler's comments. Bidwill would put this clause in any contract of that size.
Come on, Krang… you are not this naive.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,113
Reaction score
7,992
Location
Scottsdale
According to information that came out after the extreme overreaction on this board, the clause had nothing to do with Kyler's comments. Bidwill would put this clause in any contract of that size.
Huh? Of what size? Does Bidwill have some predetermined contract value where, anytime that value is hit he puts in an Independent Study clause?
Or, maybe he reacted to the chorus of concerns sent his way, about Kyler's poor preparation habits... It will be debated for years to come as to whether or not he should've put that clause into the contract, regardless of Kyler's poor study habits... But make no mistake, the value of contract sits WAY behind the real reason that clause was there.

As an aside...the fact that Bidwill felt the need to put that clause into the contract certainly speaks volumes about Kyler. But, IMHO, it also speaks equally loud about Kliff and his inability to actually lead. I mean, can you imagine Parcells, Belichick, Arians, Cowher, etc.. putting up with Kyler? Hell no...
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,296
Location
Colorado
Huh? Of what size? Does Bidwill have some predetermined contract value where, anytime that value is hit he puts in an Independent Study clause?
Or, maybe he reacted to the chorus of concerns sent his way, about Kyler's poor preparation habits... It will be debated for years to come as to whether or not he should've put that clause into the contract, regardless of Kyler's poor study habits... But make no mistake, the value of contract sits WAY behind the real reason that clause was there.

As an aside...the fact that Bidwill felt the need to put that clause into the contract certainly speaks volumes about Kyler. But, IMHO, it also speaks equally loud about Kliff and his inability to actually lead. I mean, can you imagine Parcells, Belichick, Arians, Cowher, etc.. putting up with Kyler? Hell no...
Parcels, Belichick, and Arians would not have drafted Kyler. Cowher would have given him the Cordell Stewart treatment.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
Huh? Of what size? Does Bidwill have some predetermined contract value where, anytime that value is hit he puts in an Independent Study clause?
Or, maybe he reacted to the chorus of concerns sent his way, about Kyler's poor preparation habits... It will be debated for years to come as to whether or not he should've put that clause into the contract, regardless of Kyler's poor study habits... But make no mistake, the value of contract sits WAY behind the real reason that clause was there.

As an aside...the fact that Bidwill felt the need to put that clause into the contract certainly speaks volumes about Kyler. But, IMHO, it also speaks equally loud about Kliff and his inability to actually lead. I mean, can you imagine Parcells, Belichick, Arians, Cowher, etc.. putting up with Kyler? Hell no...
Can you imagine them being bad enough to be in a position to draft someone like those listed? Hell no.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,046
Reaction score
38,948
Location
Las Vegas
According to information that came out after the extreme overreaction on this board, the clause had nothing to do with Kyler's comments. Bidwill would put this clause in any contract of that size.
According to a reporter?? Guaranteed those words didn’t come from MB. SMH
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,389
Reaction score
29,775
Location
Gilbert, AZ
If you haven't listened to it, I recommend you check out last week's Big Red Rage podcast. You can hear Rob Fredrickson do an about-face on this issue IN REAL TIME.

Start of show: The clause is good and it shows accountability.
2 minutes in: BULLETIN: The clause has been removed.
Next 58 minutes: Actually the clause didn't matter and now we've moved on.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
Come on, Krang… you are not this naive.
You can speculate all you want.

Either way, the FOUR HOURS part was exceedingly dumb. It was reported that Kyler and his camp were like...."uh ok, 4 hours...I do way more than that anyway...".

If it was such a problem, 4 hours doesn't address the problem.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,464
Location
Charlotte, NC
Huh? Of what size? Does Bidwill have some predetermined contract value where, anytime that value is hit he puts in an Independent Study clause?
Or, maybe he reacted to the chorus of concerns sent his way, about Kyler's poor preparation habits...
What chorus? Rumors and a comment he made about not killing himself with film study.
It will be debated for years to come as to whether or not he should've put that clause into the contract, regardless of Kyler's poor study habits... But make no mistake, the value of contract sits WAY behind the real reason that clause was there.

As an aside...the fact that Bidwill felt the need to put that clause into the contract certainly speaks volumes about Kyler. But, IMHO, it also speaks equally loud about Kliff and his inability to actually lead. I mean, can you imagine Parcells, Belichick, Arians, Cowher, etc.. putting up with Kyler? Hell no...
I could see McVay putting up with Kyler.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,547
Posts
5,407,922
Members
6,317
Latest member
Denmark
Top