Final 53 Man Roster & Practice Squad Predictions

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
QB (3): 13-Warner; 7-Leinart; 2-St. Pierre.

Both Warner and Leinart looked sharp last night, which is very good news for the team and the coaches. Leinart played with poise, very good footwork this time around (buying time in the pocket and stepping into his throws) and impressive accuracy. Essentially he slowed everything down and generated more snap on his throws. Even if Warner starts, Leinart can feel much better about himself and can feel confident that when turned to he can deliver. St. Pierre would have had better numbers if his receivers had played well.

RB (3): 32-James; 34-Hightopwer; 28-Arrington.

James has had a very good pre-season. Hightower has been a nice surprise, but is still making rookie mistakes, a la missed blocks and fumbles. Arrington was great at picking his spots and is running with an extra gear when he sees daylight.

FB (2): 45-Smith; 46-Castille.

Smith is clearly the better blocker. Castille is clearly the more versatile. It would not be that surprising if one of these FBs gets cut. The Cardinals don't use the FB that regularly in their offense, which makes keeping two a luxury that quite frankly they may not be able to afford with the other talent and need areas on this team. If Smith were more of a contributor on special teams, his roster spot would be a lock. Castille is a solid ST player and has already been carved a creative role in the offense. He is PS eligible, but, might not pass through waivers.

If the team could use Jerame Tuman (or one of the linemen) as a short yardage blocking FB...then the team could keep Castille and let Smith go.

WR (5): 11-Fitzgerald; 81-Boldin; 15-Breaston; 85-Urban; 80-Doucet.

Talented unit featuring two Pro Bowlers and bolstered by three solid contributors. Now that the team's ST depth has improved, Sean Morey, because he doesn't factor into the offense, is on the bubble. If the Cardinals keep 2 FBs, Morey is likely the odd man out this time.

TE (3): 84-Tuman; 82-Pope; 89-Patrick.

Hopefully Ben Patrick will be ready to play this week. Whiz loves the two TE sets and would love to stretch the Niners out...but the more he plays the two TEs the more he needs all three TEs to contribute.

OL (9): 69-Gandy; 74-Wells; 63-Sendlein; 61-E. Brown; 75-L.Brown; 76-Lutui, 50-Johnson; 72-Keith; 70-Ross.

The pass protection last night was good, but the run blocking was poor, especially from the second unit that dominated the Raiders last week. Pat Ross has added stability as the 2nd center and needs to be kept until Al Johnson is healthy. When Johnson returns, look for the Cardinals to add a veteran tackle, especially after the injury scare they had with Gandy last night. The Cards will re-sign Elliot Vallejo to the PS. They like the progress he's making.

DL (7): 90-Dockett; 97; Robinson; 94-Smith; 93-Campbell; 78-Branch; 91-Iwebema; 98-Watson;

After watching Calais Campbell last night play about as athletic a performance as Cardinal fans have seen from an interior defensive lineman, one has to wonder just how soon he will start. Antonio Smith hasn't shown up in the four pre-season games anywhere near the way Campbell has. Iwebema played his best game last night, as did Alan Branch who physically owned the middle. Dockett was excellent as well.

LB (9): 56-Okeafor; 53-Haggans; 54-Hayes; 52-Beisel; 58-Dansby; 95-Highsmith; 55-LaBoy; 92-Berry; 59-Harrington.

Highsmith and Harrington both played well enough again last night on STs and in the base defense to warrant their roster spots. Hightower was actually paired with Beisel as the 2nd string ILBers, which says he's made this team. Hayes was pretty solid last night, but all the others didn't make many plays. It's funny but there are key guys in this defense the Cardinals haven't seen much of anything from in the pre-season due to injuries or inconspicuous play: Watson, Smith, Okeafor, Green, Rolle, all come to mind.

Brandon Moore looked a bit slow and out of shape, although he looks physically strong, yet didn't play or tackle as physically as his size would suggest. Matt Stewart did not tackle well all pre-season. Joe Tafoya played his best game last week, but had a tough night last night. The coaches like him...and if he's not picked up by another team, he could be added back later on.

DB (9): 26-Hood; 29-Rodgers-Cromartie; 24-Wilson; 47-Francisco; 21-Rolle; 22-Ware; 25-Green; 20-R. Brown; 35-Celestin.

DRC is so smooth...like Campbell, he should be starting very soon. The tough decision here was Celestin over Adams. IMO, Adams brings more value as a gunner and crafty underneath cover man, but seeing as the Cardinals made Celestin a game captain two weeks ago and Celestin played one of his better games last night, they will go with him and know they can re-sign Adams to the PS.

ST (3): 1-Rackers; P-TBA; 48-Hodel.

The fact that the Cardinals already had a punter in last week for a tryout is a clear indication that Dirk Johnson won't make it. Johnson did little last night to change the coaches' minds. The worst repurcussion of this may be what happened last year if the new punter/holder and Rackers don't meld. Maybe the coaches will finally correct this by having St. Pierre hold.

PS (8): QB-Morelli (or a RB); T-Vallejo; WR-Long; DE/NT-Banks, DE-Dykes; CB-Adams; CB-Bain; S-Keyes.

Jason Banks, Lance Long and Dennis Keyes had good games last night and there may have been coaches' discussions about them for the 53 man roster.

It wouldn't be a surprise if some of the following players are brought back to the PS at some point this year: RBs-Vincent, Baylark, Johnson (FB), C Satele; T Clifford, G-Meddar, G/C Harvey, TE-Miller, DE-Robinson, LB-Holloway, CB-M. Brown.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
About the only disagreement I have with your list is: Why in the world would they waste a PS slot on Morelli? :doi:

And I admit to being a Penn State homer!
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,158
Reaction score
21,461
Location
South Bay
Punter TBA??? As much as I dont like Dirk Johnson, they arent going to replace him at this point, even if they did work out another guy. That indecisiveness will ultimately hurt Rackers the most
 

Billy Flynt

Pirate, 300 yrs too late
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Posts
2,038
Reaction score
14
Location
port royal, jamaica
Both of the Denver punters outperformed Dirk Johnson. I'd really like to see someone like Quan become the holder- great hands and great ability if there is a bad snap or a fake.

That said, I'd like to see some more Quan in the backfield, direct snap plays too.

Morelli seems a little useless for the PS in my opinion. I hope Vincent can clear waivers and make the PS. Forget Baylark, he's slipping more each week. I'm wooried that teams in need of WR help might snag Lance Long.

Finally, I would not shed many tears if Celestin got cut and one of the other DBs made the team.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,253
Reaction score
59,868
The Cardinals appear loaded with receivers but Lance Long really impressed me last night as a very solid receiver who catches the ball. I don't know where the Cardinals will put him, but I don't think he will make it to the PS as some other teams must see his qualities as well. I'd hate to lose him.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
I see no reason to keep db Ralph Brown. None. A nine year journeyman with no upside and a record of being avarage at eveything.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,071
Reaction score
3,343
I see no reason to keep db Ralph Brown. None. A nine year journeyman with no upside and a record of being avarage at eveything.

Interesting thought. Hopefully you are right and Ralph Brown is cut because that means one of the youngins has show he knows the system and can be counted on to be in the right place at the right time. That's the only thing RB has to have going for him.
 

Captain Matt

Registered
Joined
May 9, 2003
Posts
454
Reaction score
119
Location
Washington DC (most of the time)
Anyone think Bertrand might be a goner? I know he's a leader, blah, blah, blah. I like Bert, but playing in a rotation with the 3rd stringers last night was kind of funky to me if he was going to be conted on as a starter/key contributor this year. Maybe I'm off my rocker, but he might have been fighting for a roster spot last night.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
Good stuff, Mitch..

Caveats:

1. If they are certain that Johnson will be back for game #1, then I’d replace Ross with Vallejo.

2. I do not believe that both Highsmith and Harrington make the final 53. Moore or Stewart or both, are my choices.

3. Adams over Celestin (5 corners, as opposed to 5 safeties)

4. I believe that Johnson will be the week one punter because, if for no other reason, he is the holder and there isn’t sufficient time to find a comfortable replacement.
 
OP
OP
Mitch

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
51/53...Morey/Valllejo (I had Ross/Harrington)...

Surprised to see no backup center for game one, especially with Sendlein being a little dinged up right now.

We were right about Highsmith. H'bout that!

I saw a lot of good things in Harrington...sure hope he clears waivers.

But...it ain't a done deal yet...waiver wire frenzy is occurring as we speak.

Four possible waiver pickups: T, TE, CB, P.
 

Crazy Canuck

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
10,077
Reaction score
0
The final 53

QB (3): 13-Warner; 7-Leinart; 2-St. Pierre.

RB (3): 32-James; 34-Hightopwer; 28-Arrington.

FB (2): 45-Smith; 46-Castille.

WR (6): 11-Fitzgerald; 81-Boldin; 15-Breaston; 85-Urban; 80-Doucet; Morey.

TE (3): 84-Tuman; 82-Pope; 89-Patrick.

OL (9): 69-Gandy; 74-Wells; 63-Sendlein; 61-E. Brown; 75-L.Brown; 76-Lutui, 50-Johnson; 72-Keith; Vallejo

DL (7): 90-Dockett; 97; Robinson; 94-Smith; 93-Campbell; 78-Branch; 91-Iwebema; 98-Watson;

LB (8): 56-Okeafor; 53-Haggans; 54-Hayes; 52-Beisel; 58-Dansby; 95-Highsmith; 55-LaBoy; 92-Berry

DB (9): 26-Hood; 29-Rodgers-Cromartie; 24-Wilson; 47-Francisco; 21-Rolle; 22-Ware; 25-Green; 20-R. Brown; 35-Celestin.

ST (3): 1-Rackers; P-Johnson 48-Hodel.

PS (8): ????
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,304
Reaction score
1,181
Location
SE Valley
PS has an extra slot just for QBs
:confused:
Are you saying the practice squad is only seven and a QB or 8 and a QB making 9 (10 in the case of the Cardinals because of their Mexican player).

I thought it's 8 slots regardless of position.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
PS has an extra slot just for QBs

There is no extra slot just for QB's on the PS. I think you are getting that confused with the active roster rule/inactive roster rules.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,903
Reaction score
16,526
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I hope we can keep Long, Banks, Adams, Tafoya, Harrington, and Keyes.

The play of Elton Brown I guess allows us to move Wells to center in an emergency. I sure would'nt mind seeing us obtain another experienced O-lineman but I don't know who we'd have to cut.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,151
Posts
5,433,888
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top