football karma
Michael snuggles the cap space
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2002
- Posts
- 15,245
- Reaction score
- 14,299
It's not true though. We re-signed Simeon Rice.
maybe it should say "willingly"
Rice was franchised
It's not true though. We re-signed Simeon Rice.
When you consider that:
Doing nothing -- Larry would have received:
1. $31 mm for two years (assuming the Cards honored the 2009 portion of the deal); or
2. $14 mm, then been an unrestricted free agent next year, where we all know somebody would have given him $25 mm guaranteed (and probably more)
Taking $40 mm over 4 years is a accomodation to the Cardinals.
Make no mistake -- life if good when you get $40 mm over 4 as an accomodation -- but if money were Fitz's sole motivator -- he could have played this situation to have gotten more from somebody.
We dont have enough guys on our roster at the current time.
There are plenty of FA's still out and some decent ones. Quite a few good depth guys as well.
This would mean about 100 people on this board were all wrong about Fitz and his character. People said a lot of things about both Fitz and Graves that look real stupid now. That's why it's best to take Aeneas' advice and not take the business side of football personally.
Its a huge favor by Fitz... That shows his committment to this organization. Let's start winning now!This would mean about 100 people on this board were all wrong about Fitz and his character. People said a lot of things about both Fitz and Graves that look real stupid now. That's why it's best to take Aeneas' advice and not take the business side of football personally.
First, no I wouldn't spend that money on Q either. I would justify it though because Q is that type of reciever. He is the most physical WR in the history of the game, how is he not suited for a power running scheme. What reciever do you know of who is a more powerfull blocker??? Does Fitz get LBs out of the way???But would you would have no problem spending that kind of money on Boldin, who doesn't fit that mold of receiver either?
The deal came at a good time, with Fitzgerald leaving on a vacation to Argentina and Brazil Tuesday afternoon. Fitzgerald actually signed the contract while at the airport.
How will we be any more suited then if we are resigning guys from the old system.I'll give you the stretch the field part, but Fitz is a pretty good blocker. Not as good as Q but pretty good none less. Plus Q is a beast of a blocker.
I am with you 100%. It is a lot of money for a WR but as we stand as a team we are not suited to be a power running team. Maybe in four years that will be the case, but it is not the case now.
Make no mistake, Boldin will be gone in the next few years, unless we trade Fitz. If Boldin leaves, we still may resign Fitz when this contract is up. I would say I doubt it, but after this move by Graves we will likely hurt the team and bend over for whatever he wants again.I was perplexed at why Graves wanted Fitzgerald for 6 or 7 years. Boldin is the captain, and the face of the team. He is going to get signed again and again because not only is he a great WR, but he can do so much more, and he is an excellent blocker. So, if and when push comes to shove I think Boldin will stay here over Fitzgerald (hopefully that decision will never have to be made)
In four years a lot can change, and I hope for our team to be able to run the ball effectively by then.
As for now. You have to be a little excited to see this Fitzgerald debacle go away, and to enjoy that he will be on the field for us for the next 4 years.
Now we get to go debate about Dansby!
I agree with you for the most part... Should've been 5yr. deal IMO...Someone please please tell me why everyone is so happy about this?? Basically, Graves bent entirely over and gave Fitz exactly what he wanted. If that was the gameplan this could have been done weeks ago.
For the life of me I just dont get this. There goes the power-run theme.
I hope all of you are this happy in a year or two when Q is gone.
No, for all intensive purposes this will end in 2011 when Parker and Fitz try to renegotiate again...So when is his contract up? 2013?
I think that was his point. A lot of people on here were saying Fitz was all about the money & looking to hurt the Cards, etc. aj is saying that those people were all wrong.Riddle me this Batman? How often has an Arizona Cardinal requested and gotten a NO-TRADE without permission clause in their contract? If that doesn't say he wants to be in Arizona I don't know what does?
No, for all intensive purposes this will end in 2011 when Parker and Fitz try to renegotiate again...