azdad1978
Championship!!!!
swd1974 said:No one else thinks this was an insane asinine move but me? Good must mean I am on to something...
One thing for sure its going to throw rookie deals out of whack in the future.
swd1974 said:No one else thinks this was an insane asinine move but me? Good must mean I am on to something...
First you complain because Fitz won't be signed "for two months". Now you complain because he is signed.swd1974 said:No one else thinks this was an insane asinine move but me? Good must mean I am on to something...
Renz said:First you complain because Fitz won't be signed "for two months". Now you complain because he is signed.
swd1974 said:Oh Ill be very happy to eat crow on him coming in. But can a WR single handidly take you to the superbowl? Do you really believe WR's should be paid more than QB's now renz? Are you completely insane?
I'm with you to a certain extent. The fact that he's signed is the most important thing IMO. But was he not going to sign for less than a record? Our cap room should be used more wisely than this. However, I also see the point of those pointing to this as evidence of a big change in the franchise.swd1974 said:No one else thinks this was an insane asinine move but me? Good must mean I am on to something...
spanky1 said:I'll go on record as saying I'd take (and pay) Fitz more than Eli.......and yes, I think a Pro Bowl WR is just as valuable as a Pro Bowl QB.
Redsz said:If it's not one thing it's another? No offence SWD, but it looks like you are trying to find something to complain about.
swd1974 said:No one else thinks this was an insane asinine move but me? Good must mean I am on to something...
redbirdofwar said:The NFL has already floated the idea of a sliding scale for the incoming rookie class ala the NBA. Nobody from the players association has said anything good or bad about it. I would think the players association would welcome it. Older veterans would get a larger chunk of the salary cap, and while rookies would still get a nice sized piece of the pie, they would have to earn a retirement contract like Fitz's.
ajcardfan said:Your just pissed because he's not holding out into the season.
ajcardfan said:Your just pissed because he's not holding out into the season.
swd1974 said:and you will have to cut Boldin
swd1974 said:lol no the one good thing is that he will be in. That is great news. But was the price worth it is my question. You dont think a 12 million signing bonus sounds steep? Inline? What about 20 million?
Well its not your money. And I know from the jones draft that not many people count foresight as important to consider....
Well, I'm definitely insane, but I don't know about "completely".swd1974 said:Oh Ill be very happy to eat crow on him coming in. But can a WR single handidly take you to the superbowl? Do you really believe WR's should be paid more than QB's now renz? Are you completely insane?
Renz said:Well, I'm definitely insane, but I don't know about "completely".
swd1974 said:pray to god that we dont pick in the top 5 next year. It will be at least a 30 million dollar signing bonus and you will have to cut Boldin/Shelton/Jackson or some other top talent.
Keep thinking for the moment. Thats the way superbowls are won...
Toro said:I am just glad to get him in on time, Boldin has to be unhappy being the third highest paid WR on this team.