No. They are going to play that much off of Saric and Bridges while forming a lay-up line at Saric and Cam instead.
also, this is exactly why your PF obsession is wrong; do you see why?
No. They are going to play that much off of Saric and Bridges while forming a lay-up line at Saric and Cam instead.
and Paul was always more legitimately hurt
or can you not prove that either?
You would want to spend all of our free agent money on Grant (technically he signed for more than we could of offered)? I can’t argue with crazy... especially since you have spent all offseason saying Grant was too small to play PF for us.Grant and Wood, for starters.
by this logic you wouldn’t want Kawhi here either right. It’s all black and white right
Grant and Wood, for starters.
also, this is exactly why your PF obsession is wrong; do you see why?
But he didn’t and he wasn’t going to sustain it.Oh I know Paul is an incredible mid range shooter, possibly the best in the league.
I am simply referring to the spacing at 3 point range which is really what creates space.
Yes, I know he is far more respected than Rubio and that will help create space, but eventually people would be up on Rubio if he kept hitting at 36%
Oh I know Paul is an incredible mid range shooter, possibly the best in the league.
I am simply referring to the spacing at 3 point range which is really what creates space.
Yes, I know he is far more respected than Rubio and that will help create space, but eventually people would be up on Rubio if he kept hitting at 36%
You would want to spend all of our free agent money on Grant (technically he signed for more than we could of offered)? I can’t argue with crazy... especially since you have spent all offseason saying Grant was too small to play PF for us.
Geez, you have a point but not sure comparing Kawhi and Jerami Grant is the right way to express it.by this logic you wouldn’t want Kawhi here either right. It’s all black and white right
like I said your a black and white guy. It’s either this or that no real reasoning or sense. We obviously kept booker out to tank but you know whatever
No. My point is that our only candidates to start at the 4, Saric and Cam, are a major liability at the 4.
Geez, you have a point but not sure comparing Kawhi and Jerami Grant is the right way to express it.
Now this is 100% correct.This is simply false.
Cam is only a liability against true bangers, which are there are only about 10 left in the league.
Saric is actually a very good post defender, he just struggles on the perimeter, which is why he is better suited as a center in today's game.
Sorry, Kawhi and Harrel. My point remains though.it was Kawhi and Harrell
the point sucked because Kawhi wasn’t trash in the playoffs but really good like always
We were 8-0 in the bubble with Cam starting at PF. Obviously I don't expect winning every game like we did there, but that at least showed that it is a viable option.It won't matter if we still don't have a starting power forward. I would rather play 5 on 5 with Rubio than 4 on 5 with Paul.
This is simply false.
Cam is only a liability against true bangers, which are there are only about 10 left in the league.
Saric is actually a very good post defender, he just struggles on the perimeter, which is why he is better suited as a center in today's game.
Kawhi was really good in the playoffs. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
He was so good, the clips got smoked. Yeah real good. Totally shrunk in a game 7 that should have never been. THAT was embarrassing.Kawhi was really good in the playoffs. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
We were 8-0 in the bubble with Cam starting at PF. Obviously I don't expect winning every game like we did there, but that at least showed that it is a viable option.
You just made my point for me on Saric, particularly when you consider how much he struggled on the offensive end at the 4 as well. Saric is a back-up stretch 5. Period. He can't play any other position.
As for Cam, pretty much every 4, including several in the West, is a banger compared to him.