Free Agency Rumors

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,058
Reaction score
38,975
Location
Las Vegas
NFL likes production and defined roles. I could be wrong, but those are the two reasons I believe Davis gets a bigger contract.
I'm so iffy on Corey Davis. Just woes from fantasy maybe, but four years of mediocrity and not even tendered... just makes me wonder about what the guy puts in outside of gameday.

He's a better WR than the guy from Carolina.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
He's a better WR than the guy from Carolina.
I view them as wildly different in what they bring. The best use of Samuel wouldn't be to leave him to run fly patterns all day, but he can bring a variety of different creative uses in different packages. Davis is basically playing the outside and that only. Both are something the Cardinals could use, I just lean toward Samuel for overall cost, but he's looking to be a hotter name than I anticipated a few months back.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,058
Reaction score
38,975
Location
Las Vegas
I view them as wildly different in what they bring. The best use of Samuel wouldn't be to leave him to run fly patterns all day, but he can bring a variety of different creative uses in different packages. Davis is basically playing the outside and that only. Both are something the Cardinals could use, I just lean toward Samuel for overall cost, but he's looking to be a hotter name than I anticipated a few months back.

Thats fair
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,058
Reaction score
38,975
Location
Las Vegas
I view them as wildly different in what they bring. The best use of Samuel wouldn't be to leave him to run fly patterns all day, but he can bring a variety of different creative uses in different packages. Davis is basically playing the outside and that only. Both are something the Cardinals could use, I just lean toward Samuel for overall cost, but he's looking to be a hotter name than I anticipated a few months back.

Thats fair
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,610
Reaction score
15,919
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I view them as wildly different in what they bring. The best use of Samuel wouldn't be to leave him to run fly patterns all day, but he can bring a variety of different creative uses in different packages. Davis is basically playing the outside and that only. Both are something the Cardinals could use, I just lean toward Samuel for overall cost, but he's looking to be a hotter name than I anticipated a few months back.
I think Davis was drafted to be a #1 which hasn’t worked out. But a big receiver being matched up with a #2 cb could benefit him seeing Hopkins on the other side. I would assume his blocking would be better than Kirk and the other guys.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,017
Reaction score
23,172
I'm so iffy on Corey Davis. Just woes from fantasy maybe, but four years of mediocrity and not even tendered... just makes me wonder about what the guy puts in outside of gameday.
Yea I’m kind of weary on the guy myself. Would much rather sign Curtis.
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,298
Reaction score
4,479
Pleeeeeeease. That would be the best get of all the FA receiving options, IMO.
I feel like TE’s aren’t really useful in our Offense b/c Kyler rarely attempts any passes within 10 yards over the OL. Any throws to TE’s have been 15-20 yards down the field or outside the width of the tackle box. Henry is going to cost too much for what we will get out of him. I’d rather stick with Dan Arnold.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,604
Posts
5,408,578
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top