From What I Hear

What do you do?

  • Stay at #5 and take BPA (DL)

    Votes: 27 44.3%
  • Trade down to #8 or 9 and take BPA and p/u a 3rd.

    Votes: 29 47.5%
  • Stay at #5 and take other pos. of need.

    Votes: 5 8.2%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
OP
OP
WildBB

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
I think we're really starting to split hairs now. Denny's BPA approach was the best, and using his approach, then no, we would not take a QB in the 1st this year, nor likely a WR. Other than that, we'd be wide open.

Yes, we'd be wide open and pick from some very equal talent three or four picks later. (Assuming both Thomas and Peterson ect. are gone in this senario).

Among those available in that 8-9 range, assuming the 5 pick would then be Quinn, you'd have, Anderson or Branch (1 of the two), Okoye, Landry, Nelson, or L. Brown. That's very good pickings there. And you get extra pick(s).
 
OP
OP
WildBB

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
If the Browns passed on an Ohio guy, Brady Quinn, someone will be "killed". So I think it's safe to assume that the two QB's, and the GT WR go in the top four. Who the 4th guy is I'm not sure but probably the OT or the RB. Everyone else is available for us. If DG was calling the shots I'd feel a lot better than an unproven Rod Graves. But it should be fun.


I just hope Graves doesn't choke or make any promises, if the RB is sitting there in front of us.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,824
Reaction score
14,841
Location
Chandler, Az
We have to take DT Alan Branch at #5. Big run stuffers like Branch are very hard to find and don't come along very often. I'm telling you guys that Branch and Watson on the goal line would be unmovable!
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
I voted the first option, but I scoff that BPA is for certain DL. It might be, but it might not be. Another option should be there.

And that's basically what I was saying. It needs another option.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
It's too soon to judge anything here. Reading the various opinions is interesting but too many of them are just regurgitations of various "experts" pronouncements.

I trust my own eyeballs better. Remember last year when WR Hagan from ASU had a bad senior bowl week, was downgraded by the scouts, and wasn't highly drafted? Well, those of us out here who had watched him perform wonderfully for several years, knew the "experts" evaluations of Hagan were idiocy.

Sure enough, by the end of 2006, Hagan, as a Miami rookie, got more and more playing time, and produced consistently.

As we plod through mock drafts, I would rather read opinions by people who have watched multiple games of the players on which they are commenting.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
If we could trade to 8-9 and get the 2nd rounder I would say trade, if all we could get was a 3rd rounder, then take BPA

Yeah, like Michael Griffin. Huff and Whitner went 7-8 last year so Griffin would be a solid pick there. Talent and a replacement for Griffith at the same time.

trust my own eyeballs better. Remember last year when WR Hagan from ASU had a bad senior bowl week, was downgraded by the scouts, and wasn't highly drafted? Well, those of us out here who had watched him perform wonderfully for several years, knew the "experts" evaluations of Hagan were idiocy.

Always the best way to judge college players.
 
OP
OP
WildBB

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
As we plod through mock drafts, I would rather read opinions by people who have watched multiple games of the players on which they are commenting.


For the most part the top of the first round has been dissected and those players are well known and watched. It's probobly time to move on to the second round tier, where the eyeball test and consistency in games becomes even more invaluable.
 
OP
OP
WildBB

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
If the Browns passed on an Ohio guy, Brady Quinn, someone will be "killed". So I think it's safe to assume that the two QB's, and the GT WR go in the top four.


The Browns will be pressured to take the RB too. Droughns isn't the answer there, and more fans might be willing to give Frye another yr. to prove himself.
 

ThunderCard

Registered User
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Posts
1,679
Reaction score
21
Location
Denver
I would like to trade down and pick up a second rounder only if Nelson is available. Also there is not much talk about Gaines Adams ?
 
OP
OP
WildBB

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
I would like to trade down and pick up a second rounder only if Nelson is available. Also there is not much talk about Gaines Adams ?

If a trade down senario becomes plausable, because Quinn slides, taking Adams would make sense in that case as well. I forgot about him allready. He'd be perfect as a 3-4 WSLB/Rusher IMO. Also your not going to get a second round pick for moving down three spots everyone. Remember your getting a high 3rd pick not a low one.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,594
Posts
5,437,268
Members
6,330
Latest member
Trainwreck20
Top