RugbyMuffin
ASFN IDOL
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Posts
- 30,485
- Reaction score
- 4,877
While I enjoyed watching Carson Palmer, I would take Kurt Warner over him, if given the choice. Yet, the numbers show that it is not as clear cut as I thought.
Check out these stats for their time with the Cardinals:
Warner
Games: 61
Yards: 15,843
TDs: 100
Rating: 91.9
Palmer
Games: 60
Yards: 16,782
TDs: 105
Rating: 91.1
I think Palmer played on more complete teams then Warner, but Warner had the better receivers
Both quarterbacks had their struggles when they first got to the Cardinals, but I feel when Warner was bad he was worse than the worse we saw from Palmer.
Both were pretty tough guys that stood in the pocket behind poor offensive lines, though I think Warner had it worse than Palmer when it came to line play.
Again, I would take Warner over Palmer, I would have rather had Warner in 2015 than Palmer, but that is not to say that Carson Palmer was not a great quarterback for the Cardinals during his time here. I am very surprised by the numbers above.
Check out these stats for their time with the Cardinals:
Warner
Games: 61
Yards: 15,843
TDs: 100
Rating: 91.9
Palmer
Games: 60
Yards: 16,782
TDs: 105
Rating: 91.1
I think Palmer played on more complete teams then Warner, but Warner had the better receivers
Both quarterbacks had their struggles when they first got to the Cardinals, but I feel when Warner was bad he was worse than the worse we saw from Palmer.
Both were pretty tough guys that stood in the pocket behind poor offensive lines, though I think Warner had it worse than Palmer when it came to line play.
Again, I would take Warner over Palmer, I would have rather had Warner in 2015 than Palmer, but that is not to say that Carson Palmer was not a great quarterback for the Cardinals during his time here. I am very surprised by the numbers above.