Game Thoughts: Cardinals 28 Texans 21

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
There are so many positives to dwell on from this game...many more, I think, than we even realize.

To get right to the point, the offense was totally in sync and on fire in the first half. Had it not been for another red zone turnover, the Cardinals would likely have scored 28 points and had close to 300 yards passing in the first half. And the even distribution of the ball was absolutely remarkable, as 5 Cardinal receivers (Fitzgerald, Boldin, Breaston, Urban and Hightower) were at or over the 50 yards in catches mark at the half. And, what's most encouraging, is that with Hightower being such a threat and distraction as a receiver out of the backfield, these Cardinals are almost impossible to defend when they are executing and playing smart (some of the first half play calls were just stunningly smart and wel executed).

The one gripe I have about the first half on offense, was the play call on the pass to Boldin that resulted in the fumble. Fitzgerald was isolated in one-on-one coverage to the left, and it's time for Whiz and Warner to stop using Fitzgerald as a decoy whenever he matched one-on-one. The fade to him on that play would have been an easy TD, far easier than taking a slant into tthe teeth of the defense.

Whiz was great at using trickery when he was the OC in Pittsburgh...but the Pittsburgh passing attack was very limited, and Whiz had to find ways to advance the ball and score TDs that were not able to be converted on the ground. Here in Arizona, he really doesn't need to be that cute as far as trickery goes...all he really needs to do is exploit matchup advantages. This year the trick plays have stalled drives and have been superfluous.

As for the second half, IMO, the play calling was right...clearly Whiz and Warner wanted to keep playing to the offense's strengths and did not want to take the air out of the ball (imagine if the Cardinals' three and outs were becuase they were trying to run the ball---everyone would be saying, hey, they passed for nearly 300 yards in the first half, why go away from it? We can't have it both ways. The fact that the Cardinals came out aggressive in the second half is a GREAT thing). The problem was the execution broke down repeatedly...and that's what needs to be addressed in practice this week.

The Texans did what they had to do, they found ways to pressure Warner...and oddly this year, Warner's passing stats under pressure are near record lows for him...especially seeing as he is usually a master at finding the hot receiver. But, this is the thing about good pressure, it makes even the best QBs rush their throws and thus spoils the timing...as in the time Warner missed a wide open Urban on the skinny post, a pass that Warner usually can make with his eyes closed.

The offensive line played hungry in the first half...and they broke down miserably in the second half. The coaches really have to start considering some lineup changes if this trend continues. The continuity romance is fading, for these players have grown a little complacent as they haven't felt threatened for playing time.

One more offensive note: the offense should be upgraded with TE Ben Patrick's return this week. The question is, what TE will be waived, Spach or Byrd? Becht's blocking was very good yesterday. He's been solid. Spach has not and has been mistake prone, and Byrd could be quite a receiving weapon if and when he even gets a chance.

The Cardinals' special teams were quite good, save the one long punt return. Ben Graham is playing at a Pro Bowl level thus far...his play has been brilliant. Rackers has been solid, but his kickoffs have been inconsistent. Sean Morey has been outstanding...and Ali Highsmith and Will Davis have made some good hits. But, most of all, Calais Campbell is emerging as a ST super nova. Not only did he make another great play blocking the field goal, did you see the TD saving tackle he made on the lomg punt return? Wow! What an athlete and what a good football player he is!

As for the defense...they deserve a ton of credit for securing this victory. Yes, it got ugly in the second half...but the trifecta of stopping the Texans' first potential scoring drive, DRC's outstanding pick six at the most fortuitous of times, and the goal-line stand (reminiscent of the 49er game at home last year), allowed the Cardinals to win this game. In a way, this is exactly what this defense needed as a morale and confidence booster. It closed out a game in royal fashion.

The Cardinals CBs were very very good in this game. Bryant McFadden played his best game as a Cardinal...he was physical in the way that we had imagined he's be and he did everything in his power to dog Andre Johnson as best he could...and really could have had a great pick when he jumped the out pass in the third quarter. DRC played much more within himself...and the thing was...which is the big thing...these guys didn't have two things CBs really need: adequate safety help and a good pass rush.

The Texans knew the Cardinal blitz packages better than any team they've faced. Steve Slaton was outstanding picking up the right blitzer each time. The one bright spot was the pass rushing of Clark Haggans. Bertrand Berry was a total non-factor and the interior rushers did not shed their men well at all, even when Shaub was flushed into the pocket.

Zero sacks in a game where the Cardinals had a 21 point lead and should have been teeing off. Bill Davis has to figure something out...it may not hurt to play Will Davis in passing situations and perhaps even promote Chris Harrington from the PS to be a situational player.

This was a big win in many ways. It did not come easily and the Texans are a lot better than we even realize. It always great when a team can win and then learn from their mistakes. The Cardinals can breathe that sigh of relief this week as they prepare for a hug game up at Seattle.
 

MadBird

Go Big Red!
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Posts
263
Reaction score
11
what does this team need to do to get some effective pass rush? I think the secondary is getting a lot of blame, but it's really because we can't put any pressure on the QB! Even when we blitzed we got almost no pressure. Not only are we not getting sacks, we not even getting hurries! The secondary can not cover receivers that long --- they're going to get open at some point. Is it scheme? or is it just lack of talent? what's happened to Wilson's safety blitzes?
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
The Cardinals' special teams were quite good, save the one long punt return.

The Texans also had a 63 yard kickoff return.

I think the kick coverage units suffer a little from the Cards lack of quality linebacker depth and poor tackling DBs. Fortunately they do have some solid special teams specialists.

Ben Graham has been a tremendous acquisition for Arizona. 3 punts inside the 20 and a 59 yard punt as well.
 

Doug

B a n n ed WARRIOR
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Posts
1,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Lynn Haven Florida(Panama City)1 mile away.
There are so many positives to dwell on from this game...many more, I think, than we even realize.

To get right to the point, the offense was totally in sync and on fire in the first half. Had it not been for another red zone turnover, the Cardinals would likely have scored 28 points and had close to 300 yards passing in the first half. And the even distribution of the ball was absolutely remarkable, as 5 Cardinal receivers (Fitzgerald, Boldin, Breaston, Urban and Hightower) were at or over the 50 yards in catches mark at the half. And, what's most encouraging, is that with Hightower being such a threat and distraction as a receiver out of the backfield, these Cardinals are almost impossible to defend when they are executing and playing smart (some of the first half play calls were just stunningly smart and wel executed).

The one gripe I have about the first half on offense, was the play call on the pass to Boldin that resulted in the fumble. Fitzgerald was isolated in one-on-one coverage to the left, and it's time for Whiz and Warner to stop using Fitzgerald as a decoy whenever he matched one-on-one. The fade to him on that play would have been an easy TD, far easier than taking a slant into tthe teeth of the defense.

Whiz was great at using trickery when he was the OC in Pittsburgh...but the Pittsburgh passing attack was very limited, and Whiz had to find ways to advance the ball and score TDs that were not able to be converted on the ground. Here in Arizona, he really doesn't need to be that cute as far as trickery goes...all he really needs to do is exploit matchup advantages. This year the trick plays have stalled drives and have been superfluous.

As for the second half, IMO, the play calling was right...clearly Whiz and Warner wanted to keep playing to the offense's strengths and did not want to take the air out of the ball (imagine if the Cardinals' three and outs were becuase they were trying to run the ball---everyone would be saying, hey, they passed for nearly 300 yards in the first half, why go away from it? We can't have it both ways. The fact that the Cardinals came out aggressive in the second half is a GREAT thing). The problem was the execution broke down repeatedly...and that's what needs to be addressed in practice this week.

The Texans did what they had to do, they found ways to pressure Warner...and oddly this year, Warner's passing stats under pressure are near record lows for him...especially seeing as he is usually a master at finding the hot receiver. But, this is the thing about good pressure, it makes even the best QBs rush their throws and thus spoils the timing...as in the time Warner missed a wide open Urban on the skinny post, a pass that Warner usually can make with his eyes closed.

The offensive line played hungry in the first half...and they broke down miserably in the second half. The coaches really have to start considering some lineup changes if this trend continues. The continuity romance is fading, for these players have grown a little complacent as they haven't felt threatened for playing time.

One more offensive note: the offense should be upgraded with TE Ben Patrick's return this week. The question is, what TE will be waived, Spach or Byrd? Becht's blocking was very good yesterday. He's been solid. Spach has not and has been mistake prone, and Byrd could be quite a receiving weapon if and when he even gets a chance.

The Cardinals' special teams were quite good, save the one long punt return. Ben Graham is playing at a Pro Bowl level thus far...his play has been brilliant. Rackers has been solid, but his kickoffs have been inconsistent. Sean Morey has been outstanding...and Ali Highsmith and Will Davis have made some good hits. But, most of all, Calais Campbell is emerging as a ST super nova. Not only did he make another great play blocking the field goal, did you see the TD saving tackle he made on the lomg punt return? Wow! What an athlete and what a good football player he is!

As for the defense...they deserve a ton of credit for securing this victory. Yes, it got ugly in the second half...but the trifecta of stopping the Texans' first potential scoring drive, DRC's outstanding pick six at the most fortuitous of times, and the goal-line stand (reminiscent of the 49er game at home last year), allowed the Cardinals to win this game. In a way, this is exactly what this defense needed as a morale and confidence booster. It closed out a game in royal fashion.

The Cardinals CBs were very very good in this game. Bryant McFadden played his best game as a Cardinal...he was physical in the way that we had imagined he's be and he did everything in his power to dog Andre Johnson as best he could...and really could have had a great pick when he jumped the out pass in the third quarter. DRC played much more within himself...and the thing was...which is the big thing...these guys didn't have two things CBs really need: adequate safety help and a good pass rush.

The Texans knew the Cardinal blitz packages better than any team they've faced. Steve Slaton was outstanding picking up the right blitzer each time. The one bright spot was the pass rushing of Clark Haggans. Bertrand Berry was a total non-factor and the interior rushers did not shed their men well at all, even when Shaub was flushed into the pocket.

Zero sacks in a game where the Cardinals had a 21 point lead and should have been teeing off. Bill Davis has to figure something out...it may not hurt to play Will Davis in passing situations and perhaps even promote Chris Harrington from the PS to be a situational player.

This was a big win in many ways. It did not come easily and the Texans are a lot better than we even realize. It always great when a team can win and then learn from their mistakes. The Cardinals can breathe that sigh of relief this week as they prepare for a hug game up at Seattle.

BEST POST SINCE THE GAME BY 100 MILES....WOW did'nt know anyone else saw what I saw till I read this.Unbelievable....Thanks!!:)
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,892
Reaction score
4,840
Location
Iowa
Nice analysis Mitch! I agree that the second half offensive woes were not play selection but execution coupled with a breakdown in protection. As Whis said, when the opponent puts 8 in the box, you should be able to exploit it in the passing game. A couple of poor throws by Kurt, a couple of drops or good defensive plays on Q and Fitz, a couple of drops by LSH and Kreider, and a couple sacks did them in.

I too would like to see Will Davis given SOME reps on defense. We desperately need some SPEED and QUICKNESS on the edge.

Regarding the safeties, I thought Rolle greatly improved his tackling in this game, although he disappeared on the smoke screen to Johnson on the goal line. I thought Matt Ware made a difference in the safety packages. He's a much better tackler than Ralph Brown IMO.

Sadly I can confirm that I saw A-Dub's picture on a milk carton this morning. :(
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
I got a positive. I think our front 3 DL rotation is freaking awesome. Against the run they are some of the best in the NFL IMO. Against the pass they are doing their jobs that 3 men can do against 5 OL. They are doing their jobs for the blitzers behind them to succeed. The problem is our blitzers are just plain old getting stoned at the line of scrimmage. Wilson has blitzed a ton, with nothing to show for it, Dansby has blitzed a ton with nothing to show for it, Haggans is getting there but is always a split second to late. Anyways I think our front 3 rotation of Campbell, Dockett, Branch, Robinson, and Watson are doing an awesome job. If we can get some better LB's behind them, or mostly some better speed rushers on the outside, heck even marginally better or faster, watch out. Becuase of the front 3 play I think we are so close to having a legit pass rush.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
While I agree with Mitch about the defense playing better than most are giving them credit for.


I disagree with the fact our special teams played well, and that Whiz was calling the right plays.

I would have rather gone 3 and out, eat up some of the clock, slow the game down, and rest our defense a little more and run the ball. Then take up 2 minutes and have a quick three and out trying to force the pass game.

Not only that but I would not have gone to Fitzgerald or Boldin on the infamous red zone turnover. I would have gone to Hightower/Wells because it was successful on the first drive of the game that went for a score, AT LEAST TRY to run the ball just once.

There were chances to implement the running game, and implement them with some success as well. It is not like the Texans were completely shutting down the run, so I don't why our team with a good lead just abandoned the run game completely after the first quarter.

As for the pass rush ? I agree. We do not have one, not even a potential to have one. That is a fact that this team is going to have to live with.

Good write Mitch. A good read.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
I got a positive. I think our front 3 DL rotation is freaking awesome. Against the run they are some of the best in the NFL IMO. Against the pass they are doing their jobs that 3 men can do against 5 OL. They are doing their jobs for the blitzers behind them to succeed. The problem is our blitzers are just plain old getting stoned at the line of scrimmage. Wilson has blitzed a ton, with nothing to show for it, Dansby has blitzed a ton with nothing to show for it, Haggans is getting there but is always a split second to late. Anyways I think our front 3 rotation of Campbell, Dockett, Branch, Robinson, and Watson are doing an awesome job. If we can get some better LB's behind them, or mostly some better speed rushers on the outside, heck even marginally better or faster, watch out. Becuase of the front 3 play I think we are so close to having a legit pass rush.


Not to mention they were left out on the field for almost the entire second half, dug deep, and somehow had the power and energy to turn back the Texans who were "a blade of grass away" from a TD.

Edit: The Texans had the ball for 20:36 of the 2nd half.
 
Last edited:

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,892
Reaction score
4,840
Location
Iowa
what does this team need to do to get some effective pass rush? I think the secondary is getting a lot of blame, but it's really because we can't put any pressure on the QB! Even when we blitzed we got almost no pressure. Not only are we not getting sacks, we not even getting hurries! The secondary can not cover receivers that long --- they're going to get open at some point. Is it scheme? or is it just lack of talent? what's happened to Wilson's safety blitzes?

From memory I think we were getting SOME pressure in the first half.
But, realistically, this team just does not have players that can win one-on-one battles and get pressure, excepting Darnell Dockett. And teams seem to be going max protect and frequently doubling him.

And Adrian Wilson is the one Arizona Cardinal who most misses Clancy Pendergast IMO. Under the much maligned CP, Wilson was an animal on defense, making play after play after play, and striking fear into offenses from Seattle to Buffalo. Under Davis, he has been a total non-factor so far this season. If I'm Ken Whisenhunt, I have a long heart to heart with our defensive coordinator about that situation.
 

Doug

B a n n ed WARRIOR
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Posts
1,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Lynn Haven Florida(Panama City)1 mile away.
On the drive that Boldin fumbled on Beanie had two carries.One for 0 yards and another for 1 yard.Then we threw it to Urban for 13 yards and the next play was on a first down on the 10 and we threw it 7 yards to Boldin when he fumbled.

Warner made the tackle on the interceptor also.He was the last man or it would have been a score.Go back and watch the tape.You probably remember though.
 

Kel Varnsen

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
11,994
Location
Phoenix
I was stunned to see that it was Campbell who tracked down the return man on that long punt return. How does someone that big end up being the one who makes the saving tackle? Amazing effort on his part. He was limping a bit when he got up and I was worried about that, but he seemed to be ok.

We're undefeated in games when Campbell blocks a kick, as far as I know. ;)
 

Doug

B a n n ed WARRIOR
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Posts
1,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Lynn Haven Florida(Panama City)1 mile away.
According to NFL.com Will Davis DID play in this game.Maybe just on special teams though.I don't know.I agree we just don't have any speed when there is a qb who can move around.I was glad to see Haggans and CC and others give chase till a bad throw was made or the qb ran out of bounds though.

A lot has to be done before we play Baldy next week.He's got two recievers eating up the yardage in Housh and their old standby.I'm old and forget too often these days.:DBrain damage is a horrible thing.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
And Adrian Wilson is the one Arizona Cardinal who most misses Clancy Pendergast IMO. Under the much maligned CP, Wilson was an animal on defense, making play after play after play, and striking fear into offenses from Seattle to Buffalo. Under Davis, he has been a total non-factor so far this season. If I'm Ken Whisenhunt, I have a long heart to heart with our defensive coordinator about that situation.

I got to disagree, it is not our DC stopping Wilson, it is Wilson stopping Wilson. Davis is putting Wilson in the box just like Wilson likes, Davis is blitzing him like crazy just like Wilson likes. It is Wilson who isnt making the plays in the situations that he is supposed to make plays in. Wilson blitzed like crazy against the Texans and did nothing.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
This 'n That...

- I'm not so ready to give our DB's a pass (no pun intended). Schaub carved us up like a Thanksgiving turkey in the second half. You can point fingers at the lack of a pass rush but what I saw in many cases was (a) our guys bringing it, (b) their guys forming a perfect cup (with Slaton often staying back and helping out so that (c) Schaub could hit an open man who (d) was often 20 yards away from the nearest cover-guy - whether it was McFadden, Rolle, DRC or just one or two guys in a zone. I think we were vulnerable, we were exposed and I'm worried about how we'll do in future games if we don't clean this up.

- On the second long Houston punt return, I saw Michael Adams somehow scrape off a downfield block to stop A Davis at the Cardinal 40. If he doesn't push Davis out of bounds, the dude would still be running - and we'd quite possibly be 1 & 3. (By the way, how the freak did Adams get flagged for a false start on offense)?

- The reason for the funky run/pass play calling was that, in the second half, Warner was given the option of checking back & forth between run and pass depending on whether Houston brought an extra guy in the box. Houston did, in fact, bring up the extra guy, so Kurt typically checked to what he considered the offense's area of strength - a pass play. (According to Wiz, the few previous times when Houston brought up the extra guy and we ran it anyway, the play didn't work).

- Did anyone else notice that, when DRC jumped the route to make the Pick 6, we only rushed 3?

- The importance of both (a) the goal line stand to ice the game and (b) the ability of the O-line to give Warner just enough room to avoid taking a safety and stopping the clock - could be huge toward reinforcing the team's self-image as a tough and physical bunch of dudes. (This could be exceptionally important when we have to play big, tough, physical teams like the Giants - or for that matter, SF).

- Calais Campbell - Difference maker in more ways than one.

- As pass receivers, all our TE's were AWOL.

- I continue to be very nervous about our O-line. Contrary to post-game commentary by Wiz and Kurt, I don't think Houston was doing the same thing on the pass rush in the second half that they did earlier. I think they brought a lot more blitz and stunt pressure in the second half, and our O-line (and ultimately Kurt) had trouble dealing with this. To put it another way, Slaton did a better job of helping out with blocking against our rush than our RB did against there's. (Psst! Upcoming opponents will watch the tape).
 
Last edited:

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,570
Reaction score
25,590
I got to disagree, it is not our DC stopping Wilson, it is Wilson stopping Wilson. Davis is putting Wilson in the box just like Wilson likes, Davis is blitzing him like crazy just like Wilson likes. It is Wilson who isnt making the plays in the situations that he is supposed to make plays in. Wilson blitzed like crazy against the Texans and did nothing.

I think our opponents deserve some credit as well. The Texans always knew exactly where Wilson was and were prepared to block him on any blitz. Yes, I expect him to beat some of those blocks but he hasn't been coming in clean very much at all this year.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,167
Reaction score
5,242
Location
Nashville TN.
Can't give our special teams much credit as the punt return and the kick return at the end were real bad. Nearly cost us the game. Agree on the pass rush and what does it hurt to try Will Davis? We aren't getting close.

Another observation. Why is Kreider on this team? He is horrible.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
I think our opponents deserve some credit as well. The Texans always knew exactly where Wilson was and were prepared to block him on any blitz. Yes, I expect him to beat some of those blocks but he hasn't been coming in clean very much at all this year.

If thats case then he isnt a good blitzer and never was. It was a fact of him being an unknown as a blitzer for one season and one season alone then everyone was on to him. Its like the minor league pitcher who pitches lights out his first few games because no one knows his pitching style yet.

I mean Wilson is getting stoned buy TE's and RB's. He used to eat those guys alive, whats up with that.
 

Kel Varnsen

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Posts
33,369
Reaction score
11,994
Location
Phoenix
According to NFL.com Will Davis DID play in this game.Maybe just on special teams though.I don't know.I agree we just don't have any speed when there is a qb who can move around.I was glad to see Haggans and CC and others give chase till a bad throw was made or the qb ran out of bounds though.

A lot has to be done before we play Baldy next week.He's got two recievers eating up the yardage in Housh and their old standby.I'm old and forget too often these days.:DBrain damage is a horrible thing.

I think Davis made a tackle on a kickoff.

I also saw in the Gameday program that Lance Long is listed on our stat sheet, even though all of his numbers are zeros, but Early Doucet isn't on there at all.
 

joeshmo

Kangol Hat Aficionado
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Posts
17,247
Reaction score
1
I think Davis made a tackle on a kickoff.

I also saw in the Gameday program that Lance Long is listed on our stat sheet, even though all of his numbers are zeros, but Early Doucet isn't on there at all.

Here is how the special teams tackles break down for the game.

Haggans - 2
W. Davis - 2
Campbell - 1
Highsmith - 1 (he was the MLB next to Hayes on the goal line stand by the way)
Morey - 2
Howling - 1
Adams - 1
Leach - 1

On the year here is how the special teams tackles break down. Note that Howling who is a pretty bad return man has made up for it by being our special teams coverage ace, he has been a nice little dynamo as a tackler.

Howling 5
Morey 4
W. Davis 3
Rackers 3
Adams 2
Haggans 2
Campbell 1
Highsmith 1
Leach 1
R. Johnson 1
Toler 1
Rolle 1
Wright 1
Ware 1
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,892
Reaction score
4,840
Location
Iowa
I got to disagree, it is not our DC stopping Wilson, it is Wilson stopping Wilson. Davis is putting Wilson in the box just like Wilson likes, Davis is blitzing him like crazy just like Wilson likes. It is Wilson who isnt making the plays in the situations that he is supposed to make plays in. Wilson blitzed like crazy against the Texans and did nothing.

The point is that Pendergast put Wilson in position to make plays. That is not happening this season.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,227
Location
Dallas, TX
I think our opponents deserve some credit as well. The Texans always knew exactly where Wilson was and were prepared to block him on any blitz. Yes, I expect him to beat some of those blocks but he hasn't been coming in clean very much at all this year.

Here's the problem I have with our blitz packages:

1)Where does AW blitz from everytime? He's coming from the outside off the edge 100% of the time. After years of seeing the same thing over & over it's so much easier to defend. When AW is lined up at OLB and walking down in the box, he's coming. Can we please maybe try a differant approach?

2) When Hayes & Dansby are sent after the QB, again its the same thing, up the gut. Could we please try Karlos on the outside a few times?

3) We seem to rarely stunt our Dlineman and rely to much on them to beat their guy 1 on 1 nearly every play.

Believe me, I can tell nearly everytime the Cards are blitzing and where they are coming from. It's nearly the same thing everytime we try to bring pressure & I'm quite sure teams know it too. This defensive scheme is so predictable, much like our CB's playing off WR's 10 yards off nearly every play.
 

40yearfan

DEFENSE!!!!
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2003
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
456
Location
Phoenix, AZ.
Here is how the special teams tackles break down for the game.

Haggans - 2
W. Davis - 2
Campbell - 1
Highsmith - 1 (he was the MLB next to Hayes on the goal line stand by the way)
Morey - 2
Howling - 1
Adams - 1
Leach - 1

On the year here is how the special teams tackles break down. Note that Howling who is a pretty bad return man has made up for it by being our special teams coverage ace, he has been a nice little dynamo as a tackler.

Howling 5
Morey 4
W. Davis 3
Rackers 3
Adams 2
Haggans 2
Campbell 1
Highsmith 1
Leach 1
R. Johnson 1
Toler 1
Rolle 1
Wright 1
Ware 1

I wonder if any other NFL team has their kicker as one of the top special teams tacklers?:D
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
what does this team need to do to get some effective pass rush? I think the secondary is getting a lot of blame, but it's really because we can't put any pressure on the QB! Even when we blitzed we got almost no pressure. Not only are we not getting sacks, we not even getting hurries! The secondary can not cover receivers that long --- they're going to get open at some point. Is it scheme? or is it just lack of talent? what's happened to Wilson's safety blitzes?

The thing that I liked most and most impressed me was our goal line stand at the end of the game. It is not often that the defensive line and linebackers turn out to be the ultimate heroes. That usually goes to QB's, WR's. To see our lineman on the ground beating it like a drum after that stand was really great. I can only imagine what he felt. That one play is the play of the year so far in my mind. They get a lot of bad mouth but this morning they can crow. Our defense was every bit as much as anyone in winning this game. Way to go defense. Game ball to your guys.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,759
Posts
5,411,246
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top