Gladiator 2

OP
OP
Shane

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,168
Reaction score
39,239
Location
Las Vegas
There were some entertaining parts, mainly provided by the nostalgia factor.

Didn’t like Denzel in the role. So many things happened with ZERO context. Just didn’t work very well.

Halfway through I was hoping Djimon was in the movie. Alas, I was disappointed.

I don’t think it’s a bad movie, and on its own I might even love it. But as a sequel to a vastly superior movie? Meh.
I was actually really hoping his character would be in it as well
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,829
Reaction score
24,048
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
There were some entertaining parts, mainly provided by the nostalgia factor.

Didn’t like Denzel in the role. So many things happened with ZERO context. Just didn’t work very well.

Halfway through I was hoping Djimon was in the movie. Alas, I was disappointed.

I don’t think it’s a bad movie, and on its own I might even love it. But as a sequel to a vastly superior movie? Meh.
What really bothered me with the Denzel role wasn't his acting--he was fine. It was the writing. Just when he would approach a good moment in a scene, where you know there's tension to come, the scene would end and nothing happened. Ugh!

The nostalgia factor actually made it worse to me, because it told me the movie had nothing really going for it and they just had to constantly hearken back to the first one for effect.

Also:

Do we, what, have no more emperors and now just have the senate rule again? Because, I get he rather stupidly and un-inclusively killed off the first black Roman emperor before he became emperor, but to say there are no more emperors is sheer idiocy.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,211
Reaction score
16,316
Location
Modesto, California
What really bothered me with the Denzel role wasn't his acting--he was fine. It was the writing. Just when he would approach a good moment in a scene, where you know there's tension to come, the scene would end and nothing happened. Ugh!

The nostalgia factor actually made it worse to me, because it told me the movie had nothing really going for it and they just had to constantly hearken back to the first one for effect.

Also:

Do we, what, have no more emperors and now just have the senate rule again? Because, I get he rather stupidly and un-inclusively killed off the first black Roman emperor before he became emperor, but to say there are no more emperors is sheer idiocy.
I hear they also ret conned Lucias Varus to be the biological son of Maximus
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,211
Reaction score
16,316
Location
Modesto, California
Yeah, it was really, really bad all around with all that stuff. I'd say half an hour of screen time was in some way pining/reminiscing/talking about/directly quoting the first movie. Blech.
Would have been less cheesy had Maximus actual son somehow avoided the soldiers and they burned a stable boy in his place...then days later he was caught by slavers and when he got too old to be a house boy slave he was sold to a ludis to be a gladiator....where he learned of his father's fate and glorious vengeance upon Commodus.
 
Top