Good Whis video from NFL network today

Vermont Maverick

Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Posts
1,861
Reaction score
181
Location
Williston, Vermont
Interesting that Whiz said exactly where he was on the board. #7 overall, and the second receiver. Sounds pretty truthful, no reason not to believe that. I'm guessing that means it was Luck, RGIII, Kalil, Claiborne, Blackmon, and Richardson - not necessarily in that order.
 
OP
OP
Shane

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,478
Reaction score
40,103
Location
Las Vegas
Interesting that Whiz said exactly where he was on the board. #7 overall, and the second receiver. Sounds pretty truthful, no reason not to believe that. I'm guessing that means it was Luck, RGIII, Kalil, Claiborne, Blackmon, and Richardson - not necessarily in that order.

Yup I found it interesting too. They had Blackmon rated higher.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,809
Reaction score
9,631
Location
milan-italy
for me their board was:
1-luck
2-griffinIII
3-kalil
4-barron
5-clairbone
6-kuechly
 
OP
OP
Shane

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,478
Reaction score
40,103
Location
Las Vegas
for me their board was:
1-luck
2-griffinIII
3-kalil
4-barron
5-clairbone
6-kuechly

You would be wrong. Whiz stated in video they had Floyd rated #7 being there 2nd rated WR.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,155
Reaction score
24,657
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Great interview. Yeah, even though I didn't want the Floyd pick, it'd be pretty silly to say that Fitz is our GM now.

I do appreciate that even CKW admits that this will be Skelton's first offseason for OTAs and the like. Our coach knows that Skelton hasn't been given the practice and developmental time yet, so hopefully the board at large can all realize it too.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Really? I thought it was the usual Wiz fluff piece. Honestly, his sound bites area a bore. No real info to sink my teeth into.
I think the reason for the fluff was that the interviewer didn't feed him interesting questions.

To me, the story lede sould have been: "Cards get their receiver but use later picks to help the offensive line.

Zero mention was made by the NFLN folk of Massie, Kelemete or Potter (which I felt was the big story of the Cardinal draft).
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
Did some people actually believe this team just does what ever Fitz wants? Fitz is great, but a franchise QB he is not.
 

Monty

2010 Cardinals Draft Guru
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Posts
1,209
Reaction score
0
SIAP.

I dont know if anyone else read this article but azcardinals.com last week ran this piece on how player grades are presented on the Cardinals draft cards. As an example Steve Keim showed the draft card for Patrick Peterson and explained what each element of the card represented.

You must be registered for see images


Link for full size of the card: http://prod.static.cardinals.clubs.nfl.com/assets/clubimages/InsideArticlePix/DRAFT-CARD-MOCK.jpg

The card itself is pretty self explanatory, but the piece itself is a pretty good exploration of how the Cardinals set up their draft board/war room and the level of work that goes into grading players.

Link for article: http://www.azcardinals.com/news-and...he-Cards/70040dcf-e04c-48f3-91a1-b13eafd313ad
 
Last edited:

A fan who cares

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Posts
493
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
I thought the video was insightful. It's good to have the national sports media like your pick, because you get positive coverage. Not that I need positive coverage to be happy, it's just nice to get Cardinal news from the Networks.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
SIAP.

I dont know if anyone else read this article but azcardinals.com last week ran this piece on how player grades are presented on the Cardinals draft cards. As an example Steve Keim showed the draft card for Patrick Peterson and explained what each element of the card represented.

You must be registered for see images


Link for full size of the card: http://prod.static.cardinals.clubs.nfl.com/assets/clubimages/InsideArticlePix/DRAFT-CARD-MOCK.jpg

The card itself is pretty self explanatory, but the piece itself is a pretty good exploration of how the Cardinals set up their draft board/war room and the level of work that goes into grading players.

Link for article: http://www.azcardinals.com/news-and...he-Cards/70040dcf-e04c-48f3-91a1-b13eafd313ad

Loved the article, thanks for sharing. Kiem cracked me up when he talked about some players cards:

Besides the height/weight/speed are colored dots. One red dot is a medical risk. Two red dots mean the Cards will stay away because of medical concerns. Three mean a failed physical. A green dot means a positive test for a banned substance at the Combine. Blue means a verified arrest. Yellow is a character concern. “Sometimes a guy looks like a Christmas tree,” Keim said. :D
 
Last edited:

Monty

2010 Cardinals Draft Guru
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Posts
1,209
Reaction score
0
Loved the article, thanks for sharing. Kiem cracked me up when he talked about some players cards:

Besides the height/weight/speed are colored dots. One red dot is a medical risk. Two red dots mean the Cards will stay away because of medical concerns. Three mean a failed physical. A green dot means a positive test for a banned substance at the Combine. Blue means a verified arrest. Yellow is a character concern. “Sometimes a guy looks like a Christmas tree,” Keim said.

:D

I think it's an article that gives all us draftniks a little insight into the preparation for and operation of the draft war room. For example I found this quote regarding the construction of the 120 board quite interesting.

The “120” board, built to take the guesswork out of the actual draft day, sorts out the parts that can’t easily be listed as a number or letter on such a small card. It’s not as simple as putting the players in descending grade order. Instead, the grade is just the biggest factor in an equation that includes football character, the Cards’ scheme and yes, roster need.
This seems to indicate that there is a separate process for grading a player and a separate process rating that player against his peers (ranking on the 120 board) each of which uses different factors.
 
Last edited:

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
Top