DVontel
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Posts
- 13,007
- Reaction score
- 23,141
Please don’t respond with “Neither. Get both off the team” or any other statement similar to that.
Props for skipping over "don't say 'neither,'" haha. But, I'm with you on the Humphries thing. We totally lose the guy next offseason, in my opinion. I bet he plays very well and gets into a situation where he's going to get paid more than we can offer. And our OL stays in the same fluctuation point where we have to sign a mediocre player or draft one too high.Honestly, neither. I think that if one is more likely to become a star, it’s Reddick. Vance would have to decide that the entire defense would be designed to feature him, like we did with Daryl Washington, another physical pheonom who could only do one thing.
I think Humphries is more likely to play though pain for 16 games in the hope of getting a $45 million payday.
Reddick, because he’s not injury-prone like Humphries
Reddick is worthless on the field even when healthy. I would like to see him contribute on special teams this year. Completely incapable of understanding an NFL scheme
Like average on an NFL roster? Because he’s a below average starter.Hyperbole. Hes an average NFL player, with potential to be a lot better.
I vote Reddick because I just dont think Humphries can stay healthy.
And if he does? Franchise tag next year.
Like average on an NFL roster? Because he’s a below average starter.
According the over the cap, just Humphries.Reddick will have to come from further back in the pack. Humphries has shown more than him to date (which is kind of damming in itself).
Humphries has a shorter distance to go to get to a "break out" level of performance, and thus it makes sense to pick him.
Are both guys in contract years, or just Humphries?
Reddick is worthless on the field even when healthy. I would like to see him contribute on special teams this year. Completely incapable of understanding an NFL scheme
Says you. He had 80 tackles last year. I know you dont care for PFF much, but they rate him an average starter.
Definitely a disappointment for a fairly high 1st round pick.
The Cardinals’ front seven was about as uninspiring a unit as there was in the NFL. Even young players they were hoping to see take a step forward failed to perform. Former first-rounders Haason Reddick and Robert Nkemdiche earned grades of 61.3 and 59.5 overall, respectively. Nkemdiche notched all of 10 pressures in 10 games. [/QUOTE[
They sound very high on him.
Reddick will have to come from further back in the pack. Humphries has shown more than him to date (which is kind of damming in itself).
Humphries has a shorter distance to go to get to a "break out" level of performance, and thus it makes sense to pick him.
Are both guys in contract years, or just Humphries?
I think the Cards have to make a decision on Reddick's fifth-year option after this season -- next January, maybe? So it's a hard contract year for D.J. and a soft contract year for Reddick.
Honestly, neither. I think that if one is more likely to become a star, it’s Reddick. Vance would have to decide that the entire defense would be designed to feature him, like we did with Daryl Washington, another physical pheonom who could only do one thing.
I think Humphries is more likely to play though pain for 16 games in the hope of getting a $45 million payday.
Pointing to an unofficial stat on a mediocre defense and a bad run defense. Very exciting.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-nfl-front-seven-rankings-all-32-teams-after-17-weeks