I can't say I'm not a little tired of rehashing it too, but every time someone decides to bring up how great he is, I have a hard time not engaging.
But I really, really hate the concept of "he's your guy now, so stop complaining." No? I will continue to be a critic until proven wrong. It doesn't make me less of a fan.
Tells me he's a bad apple.I hear Murray likes apple pie more than blueberry.
I know you concoct some inane argument based on that info...
Apparently Mayock didn't want to take any risks at all in the draft, be it in terms of character flaws or technique deficits. He passed on much better athletes with character or technique question marks. I think the reason is that their roster has been lacking consistent and dependable players. So he got 3 players in the 1st round that are more likely solid NFL starters rather than superstars, maybe even below average in terms of 1st round talent. But they will play hard, mistake-free football and set a new tone for the Raiders franchise. They continued this trend in rounds 2 to 5 as well, selecting fundamentally sound football players without big upside. Time will tell, but building a solid foundation sometimes pays off. They for sure avoided a Reddick or Nkemdiche type pick, where projection and athleticism are higher valued than actual production and football IQ. We made those high upside picks because we falsely believed that we are close, living in the past. At least Mayock has recognized that the Raiders aren't close and need solid football players more than flashy high risk prospects.
As the saying goes around here.. you must be fun at parties.I can't say I'm not a little tired of rehashing it too, but every time someone decides to bring up how great he is, I have a hard time not engaging.
But I really, really hate the concept of "he's your guy now, so stop complaining." No? I will continue to be a critic until proven wrong. It doesn't make me less of a fan.
So he's a Keim wannabe?No, Mayock wanted to be cute and try to show everyone he knows where the gems are
So he's a Keim wannabe?
I wonder how many/if any teams talked to Keim about trading up for Murray?I don`t recall reading or seeing a lot action in that direction.Surely for such a "transcendent,once in a lifetime player" some other teams would be chomping at the bit to draft him.Wasn`t Gruden in Oakland supposed to be all slobberknocker over Murray?
I started that saying!This isn't about sides..
As the saying goes around here.. you must be fun at parties.
That could have plenty to do with the price that the Cards were putting on trading up. Just because there wasn't any serious talk about any teams trading up doesn't mean that they weren't interested in the player available, but maybe they valued Murray so highly that it was going to take an unbelievable offer for them to give the pick away.I asked a question and got nothing saying or showing me that any other teams wants to trade up for Murray at #1.Haven`t read or seen anything saying it was even discussed.
Absolutely. Just read the title of this video from Time.Yep move on!
Some here are acting just like the left with the Prez when no evidence was found to nab him lol
It’s ridiculous doing this crap day in, day out
It's interesting. I happened to catch a little bit of a local sports radio show and they had former NFL quarterback Sage Rosenfels on.The Giants thought Daniel Jones (DANIEL JONES!) was worth the sixth pick in the draft.
Wow.....you are really a bitter person arnt you.The Rosens Chosens have now transitioned to the Murray Denial Derangement Club. The MDDC.
I asked a simple freaking question.I really wanted to know if there was any interest in trading up for Murray.If that is pisses people off then do be it.
Good Lord the guy asked a simple question about whether anybody wanted to trade up for Murray.
Wow.....you are really a bitter person arnt you.
There is a reason BW52 asked the question and it wasn't basic curiosity. He's still trying to pound home a point that the Cards shouldn't have picked Murray. Saying otherwise would be at best unaware of ones own thoughts to at worst flat out lying. IMO
It's interesting. I happened to catch a little bit of a local sports radio show and they had former NFL quarterback Sage Rosenfels on.
He does evaluations of quarterbacks and he said it didn't surprise him that Jones went high. He had him ranked higher than Haskins. He had already talked about Murray before I started listening so I don't know what he said about him.
He felt Jones made quicker and better decisions and got the ball out quicker.
That could have plenty to do with the price that the Cards were putting on trading up. Just because there wasn't any serious talk about any teams trading up doesn't mean that they weren't interested in the player available, but maybe they valued Murray so highly that it was going to take an unbelievable offer for them to give the pick away.
There is a reason BW52 asked the question and it wasn't basic curiosity. He's still trying to pound home a point that the Cards shouldn't have picked Murray. Saying otherwise would be at best unaware of ones own thoughts to at worst flat out lying. IMO
How am I bitter? I'm ecstatic.
The MDDC are the bitter, whiny ones.
I got my guy.
Now I get to see butthurt tears all year.
I assume there won't be too many butt hurt people on this forum if Murray does indeed pan out.I got my guy.
Now I get to see butthurt tears all year.