The post-football-career injury issue has been a hot topic all off-season; SIRIUS has been all over it day after day.
I liked what Ditka (whom I often disagree with) had to say before Congress - namely that, regardless of who's considered to be at fault (i.e. cheap or heartless teams, the players unions or players who didn't sock away any money for "life after football") the facts are that (a) the league and its active players are rolling in dough, (b) there are former players out there who are hurting and (c) things should be done so that players in need shouldn't have to jump through hoops to get whatever help they need.
On a related topic - the issue of concussions looms bigger and bigger on the ol' radar screen. A bunch of things leap out: (1) the prevalance of "dings" (i.e. most likely "small concussions") each player experiences during his career, (2) the impact of these concussions years later, (3) the whole issue of "Can you go?" "Yeah, Coach" and the pressure some teams are said to place on their medics to clear players and (4) the number of players who don't wear their mouthpieces all the time (because they can't call out signals or adjustments "on the fly").
The question that nags at me is: What's the difference between teams and fans accepting that dings are "just a normal part of doing business" and people who condone "pitbull fights to the death?" I don't have a pat answer other than to say that it makes me very uncomfortable and that we ought to think about this a lot more.