This means nothing. The worst thing that happened is Kerr telling the media that he wouldn't grant permission for D'Antoni to talk to other teams. It makes him look bad.
Not really. If Kerr said he wouldn't ...that could mean that Kerr had no intentions and that was his way of saying "we want you here". However, if D'Antoni asked, I don't see any problem with his changing his stance if that is what Mike wants.
For all we know, D'Antoni ASKED to at least be given the opportunity to see what else is out there, and instead of Kerr saying, "No way", he said ok. You guys are acting like Kerr said OK right out of the blue. I can almost guarantee that D'Antoni ASKED for Kerr to give the permission. Does that mean he wants to leave the Suns? Maybe, maybe not.
I never said any different and I am not sure who "you guys" is. I don't think I made a stance one way or another on who's idea it was to grant permission for Mike to speak to other teams. I was just making a statement based on what was reported.
My point still stands. I don't think you can grant permission for Mike to talk to other teams yet say convincingly "your our guy". Nor do I think Mike can convincingly say "I always wanted to be here". No matter what, if D'Antoni stays both side will look bad IMO.
The bigger thing that has happened was Amare's comments about D'Antoni, not anything Kerr said.
I think that is being blow out of proportion. Amare did not say "fire the guy" but didn't exactly give him a ringing endorsement either. I am actually less concerned about that. Nash and Bell's comments were more subtle but both basically said that "things have to change" as well.
Steve Kerr wants the same exact things that everyone on this board has been whining about for a year. Why don't you guys just sit back and see if he follows through on it? Instead, everybody is ready to jump ship (as usual). Because if the coach you all hate is gone, well then the team is doomed. Wait. THAT logic is flawed, isn't it? Isn't this what all you people want??
Who is jumping ship? I have been stating since before the season that if D'Antoni didn't get it done after this season I want him gone. It's not like I joined that bandwagon after the series loss. I don't hate D'Antoni by any stretch. I just don't think he is good enough to win an NBA title. Isn't that the point? What is so "flawed" about that?
I am not under any delusion that just because we get rid of Mike it will solve our problems. However, I take the same stance as I did with the Shaq trade. If you do nothing, you can't win. If you do something, then you might have a shot.
PS. Way to generalize everyone's stance.
Last edited: