We don't have to tear down the studs because the studs are already bare. By the time we manage to replace the 2x4s, get drywall on there, and work on smaller roster issues, Dhop will be gone anyway. There is absolutely no point letting him go for nothing later when he might elevate us from 4 wins to 6, per se.
One of the top WR in FA in a dog crap FA class is going to be reasonably priced? We'll see.
Um, I'm not understanding. Tearing down to the studs keeps the studs in place. Not ripping them out.
Next sentence says we need to replace the studs. You're right--you're just not understanding, but that's a you thing
I guess it is you not understanding the phrase.Next sentence says we need to replace the studs. You're right--you're just not understanding, but that's a you thing
Ah, I forgot to put a "to" in my initial post so you don't want to understand it. Gotcha. You understand what I'm saying, you just want to employ whataboutism to make it about the metaphor and not the roster, because as we both know this roster is shot. I notice you're kindly ignoring all of the actual substance of the point with no engagement/discussion of the topic at hand.
I think Stout missed the "We don't have to tear down to the studs because they are already bare.". Easy enough to see what he meant IMO.
Short answer is no...and I think anyone saying we can in 23' needs a wake up call.
Bingo. Thanks. Yes, easy enough to see what I meant
Yup.
I truly didn't understand which position you were taking. Now I know.
Yes, but I would put it at around 20-25%.
Contender for SB or the playoffs? When most people say contender they mean SB, and that is an emphatic no for me. With a near perfect offseason, I don't see why there couldn't be a small chance of us making the playoffs.
20-25%? That's not a small chance at all, considering. I think we'd have to have a home run offseason to reach that big of a chance. I view 2023 as a complete waste of effort, so spending more, pushing more money out on the cap, keeping around aging vets, isn't smart policy this offseason for me.
That's his quasi "no trade" clause. He has to be willing to extent/renegotiate after the trade happens. Means zero if he doesn't want to go there and if there is a shred of truth to him thinking Kyler us garage, but would be go there to catch passes from Tannehill?
While from the small sample size I agree, I'd still like to see a larger work load for an entire season to see if he holds up. He is the second smallest WR in modern NFL history behind Trindon Holliday. Wes Welker is bigger than Greg Dortch. Darren Sproles and Jacquizz Rodgers are also smaller and tied for second for being the 2nd smallest skill players, but they were/are RBs. That makes Greg the third smallest skilled player in modern NFL history.
First year bump for a new HC can be a thing. I can see us winning 4 or 5 games, or I can see us somehow winning 8 or 9 games and in the playoff hunt. Too early to tell.
This is key...Right now you have Wentz, Brissett, Winston, Hoyer and maybe more available. If I were Monti, I wait until the very last moment possible, to sign someone...just so you know exactly what Murray's timetable will be.
I see our ceiling as 6 wins, unless Kyler is back healthy all year long (he won't be) and he's fixed all his problems (which I doubt). Keim and co have simply left us in an awful position, and with the QB injury to boot, we're in bad shape.
The tricky part with Brown to me is that I don't believe we should re-sign him. I don't believe he is worth the contract he wants. Turned out to be a bad trade and if I can get something back better than a 3rd rounder, might as well do it.
