Zobaczcie suki
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2005
- Posts
- 17,440
- Reaction score
- 8,667
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Exactly. None of us supporting Vance playing hicks are doing so bc we think he’s the superior the player. We just recognize he might be better for the defense until Collins knowledge catches up, or even comes close to, Hicks’. Obviously Vance doesn’t believe that to be the case at present.Agree completely. Hicks may give up a few yards here & there but a poor defensive alignment could give up the bigger plays. Our defense is playing pretty good right now. Once Collins is there mentally this defense should look even better.
Lol.here to bang my Hicks drum. go Hicks! nice brain!
I think the only way he is going to learn is by doing it and you are correct that Vance's defense is almost unnecessarily complex as stated by Denver players as the transitioned from Wade Phillip's defense to Vance's and then from Vance's to Fangio's.He does. But what hurts more is being in a poor defensive alignment for a given offensive play. Then it’s not just Hicks limited athleticism that hurts us it’s multiple players being a poor position to stop what’s coming. You know this. I’m surprised you think a rookie LB from a smaller school would be ready a few games into his rookie year to call a sophisticated defense.
Yet again evidencing the fact that you don’t understand the mental aspect and responsibilities of Hick’s position.
Look I am NOT a Hicks fan. I can’t wait until Collins is ready to replace him. But we aren’t waiting on a physical maturity with Collins. We are waiting on his ability to read and diagnose offensive sets and be capable of calling out defenses. Each individual player doesn’t read the offense and decide where to be. That is literally part of Hicks’ job description.
I know, right? It's only been five games so I don't know why people are in such a rush to get this kid out there so he can learn from mistakes. If we were 0-5, yes, I would get that. But we are 5-0. As long as it is working, don't screw with it. It's not like Collins can't develop and improve as it is.I've been saying this all season. When Collins was drafted and Keim anointed him the starter, he also mentioned he'd be the green dot guy. That is the part of the game he's not ready for.
I think you landed where a lot of us have been all along. And none of us are actually advocating for Hicks as much as we are advocating for waiting to swap in Collins until he is ready so we don’t take a step back, but rather a step forward when it happens.I think the only way he is going to learn is by doing it and you are correct that Vance's defense is almost unnecessarily complex as stated by Denver players as the transitioned from Wade Phillip's defense to Vance's and then from Vance's to Fangio's.
I just find it funny that people complain about our run defense in one breath and then advocate for Hicks after. Hicks is one reason our run defense is bad even if he can call the plays, re-align players and call audibles. Teams run right at him because they know he is a liability.
I have landed on this. We are probably better right now as a defense with Hicks playing the snaps he is, but we aren't as good as we could be because Hicks is so limited.
Yup. Maybe it’s just having played the position that makes me hyper sensitive to that aspect of ILB play. But truth be told, even my 10 year old who plays MLB in six man flag football is making reads of the offense and redirecting the other five kids where to line up and who to watch . . . and they play a 3-3 zone and I wouldn’t trust any of the other kids to do that because I haven’t been coaching them for 7 seasons and they don’t have the awareness of what to look for bc they haven’t been trained for it. Now imagine that a million times more complex and faster with substitutions and twice the number of players.I've been saying this all season. When Collins was drafted and Keim anointed him the starter, he also mentioned he'd be the green dot guy. That is the part of the game he's not ready for.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
thanks for sharing. Especially liked the Hudson tidbit. and Kliff not watching game.check out Albert Breer's MMQB over at SI. so many interesting nuggets on the lead up and management of the game:
Arizona Cardinals remain undefeated despite unusual 48 hours sans Kliff Kingsbury - Sports Illustrated
Kliff Kingsbury and Vance Joseph explain Arizona's eventful weekend in Cleveland. Plus, how Jaguars avoided their 20th consecutive loss, an interesting Ravens defense and more.www.si.com
The bright spot is we have overcome all this setbacks unlike past years where we’d fold up like a tent.I do think a clean game would go a long for for Arizona. I know this is picking nits, but a game without fumbled snaps, or hail mary's, or returns for TDs...just a simple, easy clean offensive football game.
The Chicago game on 12/5 will be the only cold weather game pre-playoffs and Green Bay is looking like the only cold weather playoff team we would potentially go on the road against. So that test is a little overstated. We have to show we can finish the year strong which is one of the few remaining hurdles to overcome.
I do think a clean game would go a long for for Arizona. I know this is picking nits, but a game without fumbled snaps, or hail mary's, or returns for TDs...just a simple, easy clean offensive football game.
The Chicago game on 12/5 will be the only cold weather game pre-playoffs and Green Bay is looking like the only cold weather playoff team we would potentially go on the road against. So that test is a little overstated. We have to show we can finish the year strong which is one of the few remaining hurdles to overcome.
This stood out to me:check out Albert Breer's MMQB over at SI. so many interesting nuggets on the lead up and management of the game:
Arizona Cardinals remain undefeated despite unusual 48 hours sans Kliff Kingsbury - Sports Illustrated
Kliff Kingsbury and Vance Joseph explain Arizona's eventful weekend in Cleveland. Plus, how Jaguars avoided their 20th consecutive loss, an interesting Ravens defense and more.www.si.com
check out Albert Breer's MMQB over at SI. so many interesting nuggets on the lead up and management of the game:
Arizona Cardinals remain undefeated despite unusual 48 hours sans Kliff Kingsbury - Sports Illustrated
Kliff Kingsbury and Vance Joseph explain Arizona's eventful weekend in Cleveland. Plus, how Jaguars avoided their 20th consecutive loss, an interesting Ravens defense and more.www.si.com
agree with everything above but want to comment on thisKliff's offense has improved every year and mostly based upon improving the talent within it.
Man, Dallas had 2 redzone turnovers yesterday...one of them at the 1 foot line...and that game led every media show last night.I do think a clean game would go a long for for Arizona. I know this is picking nits, but a game without fumbled snaps, or hail mary's, or returns for TDs...just a simple, easy clean offensive football game.
The Chicago game on 12/5 will be the only cold weather game pre-playoffs and Green Bay is looking like the only cold weather playoff team we would potentially go on the road against. So that test is a little overstated. We have to show we can finish the year strong which is one of the few remaining hurdles to overcome.