I’ll take 15-2
Or Fangio if he gets fired.I hope he gets another HC shot and we are able to hire Mike Zimmer to replace him.
That would be the easiest adjustment.Or Fangio if he gets fired.
That’s just crazyxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Just some crazy stats from this team this season.... keep it going boysxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Just some crazy stats from this team this season.... keep it going boys
A turnover can be lucky - but most of these are not. They practice forcing them, knocking the ball out, swatting.Is our defense living on turnover luck though?
We're +8 in differential. Third in the league. Interceptions are equal at seven for, to seven against.
Fumbles? 10 recovered fumbles for, vs. two fumbles lost.
I know, I know. You make your own turnover luck to a large degree. Both of the fumbles recovered against SF this past week were great plays by great players (Simmons and Murphy).
But is that kind of turnover production sustainable through the rest of the year? If not, does that mean our defense comes back to the mean statistically?
I think so. And I say that because all of our fumbles are self-inflicted bad snaps. They aren’t traditional fumbles where the defender is knocking the ball loose.Is our defense living on turnover luck though?
We're +8 in differential. Third in the league. Interceptions are equal at seven for, to seven against.
Fumbles? 10 recovered fumbles for, vs. two fumbles lost.
I know, I know. You make your own turnover luck to a large degree. Both of the fumbles recovered against SF this past week were great plays by great players (Simmons and Murphy).
But is that kind of turnover production sustainable through the rest of the year? If not, does that mean our defense comes back to the mean statistically?
I think a big reason for our turnover success is teams falling behind on the scoreboard. Pressing to try and make a play, an extra yard etc. You can’t go into a game saying “ we need three turnovers to win”.Is our defense living on turnover luck though?
We're +8 in differential. Third in the league. Interceptions are equal at seven for, to seven against.
Fumbles? 10 recovered fumbles for, vs. two fumbles lost.
I know, I know. You make your own turnover luck to a large degree. Both of the fumbles recovered against SF this past week were great plays by great players (Simmons and Murphy).
But is that kind of turnover production sustainable through the rest of the year? If not, does that mean our defense comes back to the mean statistically?
We are very fortunate so far with turnovers and they have been key to our winsIs our defense living on turnover luck though?
We're +8 in differential. Third in the league. Interceptions are equal at seven for, to seven against.
Fumbles? 10 recovered fumbles for, vs. two fumbles lost.
I know, I know. You make your own turnover luck to a large degree. Both of the fumbles recovered against SF this past week were great plays by great players (Simmons and Murphy).
But is that kind of turnover production sustainable through the rest of the year? If not, does that mean our defense comes back to the mean statistically?
At this point he shouldxc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Is our defense living on turnover luck though?
We're +8 in differential. Third in the league. Interceptions are equal at seven for, to seven against.
Fumbles? 10 recovered fumbles for, vs. two fumbles lost.
I know, I know. You make your own turnover luck to a large degree. Both of the fumbles recovered against SF this past week were great plays by great players (Simmons and Murphy).
But is that kind of turnover production sustainable through the rest of the year? If not, does that mean our defense comes back to the mean statistically?