GuernseyCard
ASFN Icon
(Couldn't resist the folowing):
Or turning a good DT into a better DE, as we did with DD a year or so ago?
Buit that's on the same side of the ball.
(Couldn't resist the folowing):
Or turning a good DT into a better DE, as we did with DD a year or so ago?
Vrable? Didn't he swap sides of the ball with the Pats?
Full time linebacker who doubled as a redzone TE in some packages.
I'm curious as well. Most successful O-D switch I've seen recently is Richard Sherman from WR to CB (though it happened in college). Ironic they have the same last name. Would love to see it here. But Sherman IS a great FB. I also like Lenon. He's old but still does a hell of a job. As long as he keeps it up, I don't care how old he is
Heaven forbid we crawl out of our comfort zone and actually try something innovative.
It might be interesting to take a look at Sherman at SILB---he's an instinctive and physical tackler.
I would think it would help disguise protection schemes as well. When they see you line up with 2 TEs and 1 RB they don't know which of those players if any will stay back in protection or go out into patterns. It also allows for an easy protection audibles depending on what the defense is showing as far as where they might be bringing pressure from.The idea in not using a FB is deception. The defense doesn't know exactly what's coming, therefore creating confusion. Seeing our RBs get hit at or behind the line of scrimmage due to predictable calls and formations is silly. I like the fact that we will have more flexibility by using multiple TE / HB sets. It's just smart football!