Catfish
Registered
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Posts
- 4,551
- Reaction score
- 64
For those of you who are still lamenting that we are losing because the players are simply failing to make plays, I submit that it is the coaching that is causing the brunt of the problems.
When Jim Harbaugh went to San Francisco, he took a relatively good and hard-nosed defense, (things that Singletary knew about), and an inept offense that everyone blamed on the lack of a capable quarterback. He gave his quarterback confidence that he would find a way for him to make plays. He then reviewed the playbook and simplified the scheme, not by taking plays away from the scheme, but by simply providing a hot read for every passing play. He took the lemons he was given and made lemonade. His players were best put into a position to succeed. Harbaugh didn't mess with an already tough defense, he merely made the offense capable of succeeding by tailoring it to his players strengths and weaknesses. Now Alex Smith is a very capable quarterback, (something that no one would have said last year).
Whizenhunt, on the other hand, given a similar set of problems, tries to shape his players into ones who can succeed with Whizenhust's scheme. He pounds square pegs into round holes, and tries to reshape his players into fitting his offensive scheme. (It is the same with the defense, they are forced to fit the scheme taught by Dick Lebeau in Pittsburgh). Instead of making lemonade, Whiz forced his players to fit the scheme, and in the process pushes on them so hard that they become misshapen, and play much less capably than they could if they were put into a position to play to their strengths and weaknesses.
The results of the two teams this year is remarkable. San Francisco has the second best record in the League. The Cardinals are near the bottom with a 2 and 6 record after 8 games. The only real difference is that San Francisco removed an offensively inept coach and replaced him with one who was willing to mold his offense to suit his player's abilities. Whizenhunt, in Arizona, has yet to figure that out.
When Jim Harbaugh went to San Francisco, he took a relatively good and hard-nosed defense, (things that Singletary knew about), and an inept offense that everyone blamed on the lack of a capable quarterback. He gave his quarterback confidence that he would find a way for him to make plays. He then reviewed the playbook and simplified the scheme, not by taking plays away from the scheme, but by simply providing a hot read for every passing play. He took the lemons he was given and made lemonade. His players were best put into a position to succeed. Harbaugh didn't mess with an already tough defense, he merely made the offense capable of succeeding by tailoring it to his players strengths and weaknesses. Now Alex Smith is a very capable quarterback, (something that no one would have said last year).
Whizenhunt, on the other hand, given a similar set of problems, tries to shape his players into ones who can succeed with Whizenhust's scheme. He pounds square pegs into round holes, and tries to reshape his players into fitting his offensive scheme. (It is the same with the defense, they are forced to fit the scheme taught by Dick Lebeau in Pittsburgh). Instead of making lemonade, Whiz forced his players to fit the scheme, and in the process pushes on them so hard that they become misshapen, and play much less capably than they could if they were put into a position to play to their strengths and weaknesses.
The results of the two teams this year is remarkable. San Francisco has the second best record in the League. The Cardinals are near the bottom with a 2 and 6 record after 8 games. The only real difference is that San Francisco removed an offensively inept coach and replaced him with one who was willing to mold his offense to suit his player's abilities. Whizenhunt, in Arizona, has yet to figure that out.