but just don't tell anybody about it.
Shaquille O'neal was not the problem. Not only that, but I can tell you this as well: Shawn Marion was not, nor is he, the answer.
If you are wondering why the Suns lost 3 of the 4 games that they lost this post season, you should know that it had nothing to do with Shaq's problems. And the Suns' problems could absolutely not have been solved by Shawn Marion. They couldn't have even been solved by Grant Hill - although he might have helped enough to make the Spurs series more competitive.
The Suns problem was that the team didn't have Steve Nash.
The Suns lost 3 games to the Spurs in which they led for the majority of the game. However, in crunch time, they didn't pull through. Do you think the Suns traded for Shaq for the impact he could provide in the last 6 minutes of the game? I know you don't. And do you think that Shawn Marion would have helped - against the Spurs, of all teams - in the last 6 minutes of the game? I sure as heck hope you don't.
The truth is, Nash wasn't Nash. And because of that, the Suns weren't the Suns. I know that a ton of Suns fans expected the team to win 60+ games, but who was going to help the team do that? Raja Bell? Boris Diaw? Amare is fantastic, but he's a power forward/center. If you want to win, you need to have a perimeter player who can create baskets in crunch time, when the defense buckles down - and more importantly, when the defense sags in and clogs up the lane a little more than usual - because they will be the only players that have enough court freedom to make the important play. You send it into Amare, or Tim Duncan, and you're going to need someone on the perimeter to get the ball on the kick-out, after the double team comes, and make a play. Nash used to do that so consistently. Shawn Marion did not. But in the 5 playoff games this season, he didn't do that.
When the team needed a play - be it in the last moments of the fourth quarter, or to quell a mini-run by the other team in the 1st quarter, or anytime in between - Nash used to make that play. Time and again. And this post-season, he simply didn't. I don't blame Nash for being human. But for the people who think it had anything to do with the Shaq trade, perhaps you'd be better suited sharing your opinion on a Yahoo! Sports board.
Shaquille O'neal was not the problem. Not only that, but I can tell you this as well: Shawn Marion was not, nor is he, the answer.
If you are wondering why the Suns lost 3 of the 4 games that they lost this post season, you should know that it had nothing to do with Shaq's problems. And the Suns' problems could absolutely not have been solved by Shawn Marion. They couldn't have even been solved by Grant Hill - although he might have helped enough to make the Spurs series more competitive.
The Suns problem was that the team didn't have Steve Nash.
The Suns lost 3 games to the Spurs in which they led for the majority of the game. However, in crunch time, they didn't pull through. Do you think the Suns traded for Shaq for the impact he could provide in the last 6 minutes of the game? I know you don't. And do you think that Shawn Marion would have helped - against the Spurs, of all teams - in the last 6 minutes of the game? I sure as heck hope you don't.
The truth is, Nash wasn't Nash. And because of that, the Suns weren't the Suns. I know that a ton of Suns fans expected the team to win 60+ games, but who was going to help the team do that? Raja Bell? Boris Diaw? Amare is fantastic, but he's a power forward/center. If you want to win, you need to have a perimeter player who can create baskets in crunch time, when the defense buckles down - and more importantly, when the defense sags in and clogs up the lane a little more than usual - because they will be the only players that have enough court freedom to make the important play. You send it into Amare, or Tim Duncan, and you're going to need someone on the perimeter to get the ball on the kick-out, after the double team comes, and make a play. Nash used to do that so consistently. Shawn Marion did not. But in the 5 playoff games this season, he didn't do that.
When the team needed a play - be it in the last moments of the fourth quarter, or to quell a mini-run by the other team in the 1st quarter, or anytime in between - Nash used to make that play. Time and again. And this post-season, he simply didn't. I don't blame Nash for being human. But for the people who think it had anything to do with the Shaq trade, perhaps you'd be better suited sharing your opinion on a Yahoo! Sports board.