Jason Whitlock Article

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
I didn't really know where to post this. I read this article today and I have to say that I really like his work. I would like to know other people's opinions on him as well.

Basketball, Football Rotting as We Watch
TV Sports Overrun by Immature, Ill-Educated Players
By JASON WHITLOCK
AOL
Sports Commentary

Hang with me over the next several columns. I'm going to try to define how the overwhelming flood of television and gym shoe money has damaged professional/college football/basketball, their participants and fans and offer my strategy for fixing this problem.
It might take two columns or it might take five for me to make all of my points. Please e-mail the links to these columns to your friends who are fans of or participants in football and basketball. Please feel free to e-mail me feedback at [email protected]. You might think of something I haven't.

In this first column, I'm going to mostly discuss what I think is wrong with basketball and its participants. Understanding what's wrong, in my opinion, will help you understand the solution I'm going to offer.

In future columns, I'll limit the discussion to football and basketball because the sports are unique in that the NFL and NBA turn young men into instant celebrities and millionaires far more quickly than baseball and hockey, sports with established, off-Broadway minor league systems. Also, college baseball and hockey are not true TV sports.

It's my belief that in order to correct what ails football and basketball and their participants we have to accept that TV sports are totally different from non-TV sports. College athletes participating in sports that are primarily controlled and financed by television networks need to be governed by a different set of rules from a wrestler or a swimmer or a gymnast.

Women's basketball won't be a part of this discussion, either. The sport is not yet a major revenue generator, the WNBA is a weak television force and there are still only a handful of women's college basketball programs that have become as ethically/academically bankrupt as men's programs.

Men's basketball and football are rotting on the inside. March Madness, no matter how much the media fawn, doesn't cover the stench. The players are mercenaries who rarely get properly educated. At the professional level, the lawlessness of the players is an embarrassing turnoff to fans. In the NBA, it's widely accepted that the players don't play hard until the postseason and the pro game has been exposed as inferior by international competition. The professional leagues are overrun by immature players who are completely unprepared for the money and spotlight the NFL and NBA provide.

The rules need to be dramatically changed. For the most part, they were established long before the NBA and the NFL turned 19 to 22 year olds into overnight millionaires.
Let's start specifically with basketball. Right now all the hubbub is about whether Kevin Durant should leave Texas after one year. The media conversation focuses on whether Durant should be the top pick over Greg Oden, another freshman star. Because of the instant millions that await Durant and Oden as the top two picks, it's considered foolish to even discuss whether either would benefit from another year or two in college.

NBA executives, people presumably intelligent enough to know that Durant and Oden will stunt their intellectual and basketball evolution by entering the NBA at 19, have been breathlessly jockeying for Durant and Oden to leave college. Everybody, it seems, has this foolish belief that a large sum of money acts only as a problem-solver. It multiplies problems just as quickly.

Strictly from a basketball standpoint, the current NBA-eligibility system damages the game of basketball. Kevin Durant is a great kid. If left to develop in college, he could one day become one of basketball's all-time great players and winners.

If he leaves Texas now, it's almost a certainty he will never reach his full potential as a basketball player. Kevin Durant doesn't know the first thing about winning.

His Texas team, although young, underachieved this year, losing 10 games and bowing out of the NCAA Tournament in the second round after an embarrassing performance against USC.

Basketball players learn how to win and how to prepare to win in college. It's not a coincidence that the greatest NBA players over the past 25 years -- Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Isiah Thomas and Hakeem Olajuwon -- were all huge winners in college.

Kobe Bryant is the only straight-from-high school NBA superstar to win multiple championships. Of course, Shaquille O'Neal was the true star of those Lakers teams, and Kobe's snotty, child-star-spoiled attitude tore apart that Lakers dynasty.

You realize it's nearly impossible to control or even reason with the average know-it-all teenager? Imagine trying to coach a relatively uneducated, unsophisticated 18 to 22-year-old with several million dollars in his bank account. It's impossible.

NBA players don't want to be coached. They grow up playing winning-doesn't-really-matter AAU ball and being "coached" by professional butt-kissers who are far more interested in a payoff than bending young minds to team concepts.

Michael, Magic, Larry, Isiah and Hakeem all benefited from participating and succeeding in college. Had they not attended college and instead been given multi-million-dollar contracts at 18 or 19, I contend they would not have been as successful as professionals.

Here's another downside to a significant number of players leaving college after one or two years: It prevents the players from evolving socially.

It used to be that 95 percent of NBA players spent at least three years in college. What happens to most people when they're in college? They develop a totally new social group. The friends you thought you couldn't live without in high school get replaced by the friends you make in college.

So what happens now? Your boys in grade school and neighborhood opportunists identify a high-profile athlete as a possible lottery ticket and dig their hooks in deep. Guys carry their high school posses right into the NBA.

Some of the athletes call it "keeping it real." For the most part, it's keeping it real stupid. The hangers-on are leeches, people determined to prevent the star athlete from seeing the big picture or evolving past street culture.

Big-time athletes rarely say or do anything important now because a Dr. Harry Edwards never gets a chance to get inside their head. The athletes visit college campuses for a year or two, but never experience what's really happening on those campuses because their entourages won't allow it.

They're also less likely to develop friendships with people who don't have a financial interest in them. They don't develop peers -- young people their age who are headed for professional careers.

It used to be that the NBA drafted 21- and 22-year-olds who entered the league with relatively well-developed fundamental skill sets, an understanding of what it takes to win and a passionate fan base. The players were marketable. Beyond potential, a bad attitude, a sense of entitlement, a tattoo-graffiti-stained body and a posse, what does the typical American-born, early-entree basketball draftee bring to the NBA?

The players are a lot less valuable, but they're being lavished with far more money than Magic Johnson received when he entered the league. Magic and Bird had to elevate the entire league and become ultimate winners to earn millions.

Kevin Durant just finished 25-10 without elevating the performance of one of his college teammates, and he'll be seduced with a shoe contract from Nike or Reebok that will dwarf the 25-year, $25-million "lifetime" contract the Lakers once offered Magic after he'd made the Lakers and the NBA the rival of the Cowboys and the NFL.

Yeah, the game has changed and the rules that govern the game must dramatically change.



The current setup is failing the game. We play an inferior brand of basketball. The NBA is virtually unwatchable in the regular season. Shaquille O'Neal won't be the last NBA star to get in the habit of skipping the first half of the regular season and deny season ticket holders of what they paid for in November, December and January.

The setup is also failing the athletes. Their educational opportunities are compromised the moment they enter high school and are identified as a prospect. By the time they enter college, almost no one in authority over them has a genuine interest in their education. The interest is in their eligibility and their ability to meet the demands of TV networks.

The money and fame are turning out the athletes the way Hohabits (drugs, poor work ethic, gigantic egos, etc.). We see the finished product. If they sold tickets to watch a star make a movie or television show and invited the media to write about what transpired on the set every day, we'd be repulsed by the behavior and snotty attitudes of Johnny Depp, James Gandolfini and Sandra Bullock. The same would be true if we watched Madonna or Usher record an album.

OK, this a good place to stop. I have lots more to say. Check back on Monday, Tuesday at the latest. Also, send me e-mails with your thoughts. [email protected].
llywood and the music industry turn out their child stars. Dennis Rodman = Michael Jackson. The problem is sports fans have different expectations from music/movie fans and child entertainment stars don't have to go to high school or college.
 

SO91

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Posts
3,046
Reaction score
371
Not bad, but I thought he made vast generalizations about the "typical" NBA athlete. While what he describes is true, I would guess it doesn't apply to the majority. Just my opinion though, since I have no facts to back it up
 

tobiazz

Hall of Famer
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
2,153
Reaction score
4
This writer is bent out of shape because salaries have risen along with league revenues over the last 20 years? Next he'll complain that Coca-Cola's sugar water used to be 10 cents and it's $1.00 now. Would he be happier if all that money was in the owners' pockets instead? Perhaps he should have stayed in school longer and learned about supply and demand. How would he feel if only journalists that made a company as famous as the Cowboys received higher pay than the best journalists of 20 years ago?

And players don't try until the playoffs? I should have stopped when I read that. The league may be more enjoyable to the fans if players stayed in college longer but it is what it is.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,418
Reaction score
9,529
Location
L.A. area
Didn't Magic Johnson leave after only two years?

The reasoning is pretty flawed. Whenever his evidence doesn't reach to his conclusion, he simply makes an assumption to fill in the gap (Durant won't achieve his potential if he leaves now, Jordan wouldn't have been such a successful pro had he left early). His facts are wrong about the Lakers' blowup, and he exaggerates Isiah Thomas's greatness because it reinforces his point. Overall, it's a shoddy piece.

However, he does make the interesting observation that, with the arguable exception of Bryant, no player straight from high school has yet led his team to a title. Garnett, McGrady, Stoudemire, Jermaine O'Neal, and James are all great players who have all made multiple All-Star teams, but their playoff success has been quite limited -- in fact, none of those players has made it as far as the conference finals more than once, and none has advanced past that round. Maybe the college game really does help players learn how to win when the pressure is highest.

Of course he's right that most players are more concerned with their paychecks than with listening to their coaches. But you can't teach professional pride -- not even in college. And when Shaquille O'Neal is your poster child for doing it the right way, your argument is awfully shaky.
 

se7en

Go SUNS Go
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
900
Reaction score
1
Location
City of Angels
Actually, Moses Malone appeared in 2 finals and won one. Darryl Dawkins went to the finals. Shawn Kemp went to the finals. And as mentioned Kobe won 3 finals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_high_school_players

Looking even further you'll see that only 42 players have ever been drafted straight out of high school. If you take that very small number and compare it to the total number of all players ever drafted, I'd bet that the overall success rate is much higher with high school players. The list of high school players is pretty impressive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:NBA_high_school_players

NBA high school players
List of prep-to-pro players
B
Jonathan Bender
Andray Blatche
Kwame Brown
Kobe Bryant
Jackie Butler
Andrew Bynum
C
Tyson Chandler
Eddy Curry
D
Darryl Dawkins
DeSagana Diop
E
Ndudi Ebi
Monta Ellis
G
Kevin Garnett
Gerald Green
H
Al Harrington
Dwight Howard
J
LeBron James
Al Jefferson
Amir Johnson
L
James Lang
Rashard Lewis
Shaun Livingston
M
Moses Malone
Tracy McGrady
C. J. Miles
Darius Miles
O
Jermaine O'Neal
Travis Outlaw
P
Kendrick Perkins
S
Ricky Sanchez
J. R. Smith
Josh Smith
Leon Smith
DeShawn Stevenson
Amare Stoudemire
Robert Swift
T
Sebastian Telfair
W
Martell Webster
Louis Williams
Dorell Wright
Y
Korleone Young
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,418
Reaction score
9,529
Location
L.A. area
Moses Malone is a great counterexample. Kemp probably reinforces Whitlock's argument, and Dawkins is on the fence.
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,335
Reaction score
5,254
Location
Vegas
whitlock is a weird guy. he said durant didn't make his teammates better? he said UT underachieved? UT lost 3 players to the nba draft off last year's team....also lost undrafted senior leader brad buckman who was on the mavs summer team. UT was not expected to be a top team with a team full of freshman. Their most experienced player was sophomore abrams who is mainly a jump shooter. durant was a pleasant surprise and i'd say he did make his teammates much better. Whitlock also said Vince Young could never win a NT and would not make it in the NFL. Now he does bring up some valid points.....overall i think durant would benefit by playing in college one more year. But what would whitlock do if he had millions awaiting him in the nba? something tells me he would eat the cheese.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
I've met Jason. He is one of the most interesting people in all of sports journalism. He also writes for the KC Star. Jason also played college football -- Ball State in the late 80s. He's not just some near-sighted wanna-be jock sniffer who took up sports journalism so he could get closer to his heroes.

Some of you may remember the ruckus Jason caused by commenting on the thuggery on the streets of Vegas during the All-Star game. Jason condemned the rap star/homeboy entourage that accompanies the NBA these days, and no one criticized him for comments like that because of one thing: He's black.

That said, this article expresses Jason's point of view. It is disappointing in its lack of supporting evidence, and instead rides a common perception. It's not only bad journalism, it's bad argumentation. I actually agree with his point of view, but I would not publish something like this without statistics and logical analysis, and I would never write such broad generalizations. He failed in all regards, IMO.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,440
Posts
5,398,549
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top