I will watch this movie, because it looks somewhat interesting.. But gosh dammit.. I better see some explosions or karate kicks to the face.. Or its getting low marks from me.. just saying..
I will watch this movie, because it looks somewhat interesting.. But gosh dammit.. I better see some explosions or karate kicks to the face.. Or its getting low marks from me.. just saying..
Caught it on demand over the weekend. Didn't hate it. I actually enjoyed watching it like a history lesson (not the details, mind you, but the big picture timeline of the Apple early years).
Not the best of movies. Jumped through time too much, with characters appearing and disappearing through eras without much explanation. I couldn't tell if this was because they thought the details of his life were such common knowledge that they didn't have to connect the dots (i.e. his daughter suddenly living with him as a teenager) or it was just shoddy direction/writing.
I think Kutcher did a good job, though, of trying to show Steve Jobs, warts and all. He was not likable at all, yet he was strangely magnetic.
Wife loved it but she did say, "My God, did anyone in the IT revolution get rich without screwing over their partners or actual creators of the product?"
Caught it on demand over the weekend. Didn't hate it. I actually enjoyed watching it like a history lesson (not the details, mind you, but the big picture timeline of the Apple early years).
Not the best of movies. Jumped through time too much, with characters appearing and disappearing through eras without much explanation. I couldn't tell if this was because they thought the details of his life were such common knowledge that they didn't have to connect the dots (i.e. his daughter suddenly living with him as a teenager) or it was just shoddy direction/writing.
I think Kutcher did a good job, though, of trying to show Steve Jobs, warts and all. He was not likable at all, yet he was strangely magnetic.
Wife loved it but she did say, "My God, did anyone in the IT revolution get rich without screwing over their partners or actual creators of the product?"
Hertzfeld came off as very naive in the movie, he was younger but the guy was absolutely brilliant and EXTREMELY self confident at Magic, I really can't picture him responding to the are you good question by saying I think so. He was one of those our software is better, people might not get that but that's their problem not ours kind of people.
What was the point of him being in the movie at all? They asked him to join a team and then he's never really heard from again (on screen). If they took a revisionist approach with who invented what, why toss him into the mix at all? The more I think about it, the more I believe the director was just not up for the job.
Caught it on demand over the weekend. Didn't hate it. I actually enjoyed watching it like a history lesson (not the details, mind you, but the big picture timeline of the Apple early years).
Not the best of movies. Jumped through time too much, with characters appearing and disappearing through eras without much explanation. I couldn't tell if this was because they thought the details of his life were such common knowledge that they didn't have to connect the dots (i.e. his daughter suddenly living with him as a teenager) or it was just shoddy direction/writing.
I think Kutcher did a good job, though, of trying to show Steve Jobs, warts and all. He was not likable at all, yet he was strangely magnetic.
Wife loved it but she did say, "My God, did anyone in the IT revolution get rich without screwing over their partners or actual creators of the product?"
I watched it too and there were too things at the end that irked me.
First, how he stumbled across Jonathan Ive and made it seems like Jobs pushed him to created the iMac desing and gave Ive very little credit for the iMac, iPod and iPhone designs. In fact, right after that they show Jobs with a Discman and it lead others the believe it was Jobs who came up with it based on that.
The other thing that they left out was that Microsoft saved Apple when Jobs came back by investing a ton of money ($150 million) into the compnay and kept it from going under.