POSTED 6:08 p.m. EDT; LAST UPDATED 6:30 p.m. EDT, September 9, 2007
JOE BUCK SHOULD STICK TO BASEBALL
Part of the problem with being a smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all is that, when said smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all makes a mistake, folks who don't like the smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all will focus far more heavily on the gaffe than if the person committing the error were not a smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all.
Though we really don't have an opinion one way or the other on the smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all named Joe Buck, we've been flooded with e-mails regarding the fact that he continues to refer to Chargers receiver Craig Davis as "Buster Davis" during the Week One game between San Diego and Chicago.
Buck is at least in the ballpark; Buster Davis was a third-round pick in the 2007 draft. But there's no reason for him to be confusing Craig Davis with Buster Davis; Buster was selected by the Cardinals, cut on September 1, and signed to the Lions' practice squad. He has no connection to the Chargers or the Bears.
The e-mails we received complained about Buck calling Craig "Buster" on multiple occasions in the first half. We heard it with own our ears twice regarding the same play in the third quarter. And then four more times just before we posted this items, as Davis was preparing to return a punt.
Apart from the fact that Buck doesn't know the Chargers' lineup as well as he should, why isn't someone telling him that he's got it wrong?
We realize that Buck is "the guy" at FOX, but maybe it's asking too much for "a guy" to handle baseball and football.
UPDATE: We're now getting e-mails from people who are telling us that Davis's nickname is "Buster." Some initial Googling suggests that they are right. Still, Buck needs to make it more clear that he's using a nickname and that he merely isn't getting the guy's name wrong. He's officially listed as "Craig Davis"; by calling him "Buster" with another guy in the NFL whose name is "Buster Davis," Buck is inviting criticism. Especially since he's a smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all, in our opinion.
SECOND UPDATE: As evidenced by all of the e-mails I've received confirming that Craig is also "Buster," I've learned that the problem with being a smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all Internet hack is that when said smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all Internet hack makes a mistake, folks who don't like the smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all Internet hack will focus far more heavily on the gaffe than if the person committing the error were not a smarmy, metrosexual know-it-all Internet hack.