clif said:Name one time where any corporation asked a former employee to make guest apperances on their behalf and not expect to compensate them for travel costs?
Bolded is why. The NFL was compensating and then some!
clif said:Name one time where any corporation asked a former employee to make guest apperances on their behalf and not expect to compensate them for travel costs?
Shane H said:Bolded is why. The NFL was compensating and then some!
clif said:so says you... Per their standards they wanted more... so they balked.. what wrong with that??? Oh wait.. I know.. it's because they made millions of dollars right?.. While the NFL makes billions! It's called business..
Billy Flynt said:Additional thread on this topic:
http://www.arizonasportsfans.com/vb/showthread.php?t=68001
They offered plane tickets, hotel accommodations, meals, a Cadillac to drive for the weekend, tickets to parties, etc. plus $1000 cash. Neither of these guys really needs any of those things....
If it is true that they turned the invite down because of $$$ it's just bad "sportsmanship" from two of the best Super Bowl performers ever.
Shane H said:Not so syas me. So says reliable ESPN on this AM's radio. You act as though its wrong that the NFL is a billion dollar industry? But once again your comparison is no good.
clif said:No not at all. But you act like it's wrong for them to make millions of dollars. They are business men just like everyone else. They have a right to make a business decision. Why is this news? ( I know the answer but just think it is silly to rip these guys)
krepitch said:I love when guys hold out and end up getting less money than what they were originally offered. This reminds me of that situation.
IMO, they should have gone as a gesture. It would have been sportsmanlike and a thankyou to the fans.
At least Bradshaw could have hyped his new movie. That would have been a good business decision, no?
Dback Jon said:If not for the Super Bowl, Joe Montana would be just another QB - for him to miss this was inexcusible.
Montana chose to be with family
Ex-49ers QB defends spurning pregame ceremony
Kevin Lynch, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 7, 2006
Printable Version
Email This Article
Baseball (AL/NL)
NFL
College Football
Tennis
Golf
NHL
NBA
WNBA
College Hoops (M)
College Hoops (W)
Soccer (M)
Auto Racing
Boxing
Horse Racing
Former 49ers quarterback Joe Montana on Monday defended his decision to decline an invitation to be a part of a Super Bowl pregame ceremony with past Super Bowl MVPs.
The Chronicle cited two league sources in Monday's editions saying that the three-time Super Bowl MVP wanted at least $100,000 in order to appear. The NFL offered two tickets to the game, hotel accommodations, weekend car rental, tickets to three NFL parties, $1,000 spending money and first-class airfare.
The office of Peter Johnson, Montana's agent at IMG, sent out a statement in response to the media fervor prompted by The Chronicle report.
"Joe Montana was in Detroit for Super Bowl activities on the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday prior to the game, but always had planned to return home before the weekend to be with his family," the statement read. "He fulfilled his promise to attend son Nathaniel's basketball game on Friday night and son Nicholas' game on Sunday, and then be home with his family to watch the Super Bowl."
Montana expounded on that statement on ESPN's "Quite Frankly with Stephen A. Smith." Smith reached Montana by phone at Montana's Santa Rosa home Monday.
"To me, it's more important to be home with my boys," Montana told Smith. "The Super Bowl is a great event, but I've moved on with my life."
Montana expressed regret that he wasn't around enough during his playing days to attend events by his two eldest daughters, Alexandra, 20, and Elizabeth, 19.
"When I was playing, I missed my two girls' (events)," Montana said. "They look up (in the stands) and myself and my wife are not there. I want to be there for the boys." Nathanial is 16 and Nicholas is 13.
When Smith asked why league sources would leak information about Montana's inability to attend, Montana said, "People were trying to find ways to make me want to stay. I try to appease everyone, but it's impossible."
When asked directly by Smith if he had asked the NFL for appearance money, Montana said no.
He went to Detroit to promote a drug that controls his high blood pressure. He said that CNN moved up an interview on Thursday night, so he could catch his plane Friday.
Montana was asked by the NFL to be a part of a pregame presentation with all of the surviving Super Bowl MVPs. Montana, former Steelers quarterback Terry Bradshaw and former Dolphins defensive back Jake Scott (who was vacationing in Australia) didn't show up.
Reports, including one in The Chronicle, said money was also an issue with Bradshaw. Bradshaw has said that he had family obligations.
moklerman said:If my dad told me he was going to miss my meaningless high school basketball game because he was asked to be part of a 40th anniversary celebration of the biggest event in sports, I think I'd cut him a little slack.
Shane H said:At teh risk of sounding stupid. Who the hell is Jake Scott?
TRW said:This is what is problem with the Super Bowl today.
NOBODY but Mr. Montana and Mr. Bradshaw can know EXACTLY why they passed on the invitation. It is their business, not ESPN's or the fan who thinks they "owe" them the right to see them hobble down on the field.
The parade of former MVP's, TV commercials, who is singing the National Anthem, who is playing at halftime, what famous personality can get their mug on camera, ad nauseum...
Oh yeah....they played a football game on Sunday too...
It's beyond ridiculous...
golfcardfan said:Per article above Joe Montana completed his obligation and then went home to be with his family. I have absolutely no problem with that seems to me he has his priorities straight! Your family is more important than making a brief appearance at the SB which I am sure he has done numerous times. Let the guy have a life after football!
AzCards21 said:Some things you do for your profession and not for the money. That's a pretty exclusive group to be associated with and the status goes well beyond the dollars they've earned.