xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Hmm I wonder where all that money is going to go? I wouldn't say that Joker is a tentpole big property at the moment, but maybe they are changing it up.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
i don't know... even though comic book movies have flamed out recently, we've seen big series like Guardians and the last Batman still break from the mold at the recent box office.Hmm I wonder where all that money is going to go? I wouldn't say that Joker is a tentpole big property at the moment, but maybe they are changing it up.
I just read that Phoenix is getting $20 million and Lady Gaga is getting close to $15 million. That alone is nearly 2/3 of the first films budget.Hmm I wonder where all that money is going to go? I wouldn't say that Joker is a tentpole big property at the moment, but maybe they are changing it up.
The first movie was a straight drama, more like a psychological thriller, so 60m isn't that big of a stretch, but to go to $200m? If a majority of that jump is Lady Gaga, then they were stupid for casting her. That's a massive jump for a sequel to a movie that isn't a tentpole action movie like Guardians and Batman.i don't know... even though comic book movies have flamed out recently, we've seen big series like Guardians and the last Batman still break from the mold at the recent box office.
Also, the first Joker made over a billion dollars, got multiple oscars nominations including... best picture I think and is adding a pretty big piece to the puzzle with Gaga/musical? And sequels always go bigger so that that's seems like a formula for a tent pole for the sequel.
as to where all the money's going to go, that's a good question. The first one was pretty stripped down until the end. My guess is if this is truly a musical, Todd Phillips goes kinda wild with huge musical set-pieces and more chaos.
And...? That's a lot of money, sure, but it's not 200m.I just read that Phoenix is getting $20 million and Lady Gaga is getting close to $15 million. That alone is nearly 2/3 of the first films budget.
I agree. I was just pointing out that that a large portion this time around is going to the two stars salaries. 17.5% of the overall budget. Phoenix went from $4.5 million to $20 million and the budget when from $60 million to $200 million. That's a decent chunk of the new budget. So just pointing that out.And...? That's a lot of money, sure, but it's not 200m.
I don't think its unreasonable to question where all that money is going to.
I expect a sequel to go a lot bigger with more set pieces and grand song and dance numbers. Musicals can be pretty price if you’re shooting on a massive scale.The first movie was a straight drama, more like a psychological thriller, so 60m isn't that big of a stretch, but to go to $200m? If a majority of that jump is Lady Gaga, then they were stupid for casting her. That's a massive jump for a sequel to a movie that isn't a tentpole action movie like Guardians and Batman.
its going into special effects of course...enough to distract the director from his original vision and turn it into a disjointed mishmashAnd...? That's a lot of money, sure, but it's not 200m.
I don't think its unreasonable to question where all that money is going to.
That's rather disingenuous, as movie fans don't usually care how much you overspend on your movie. It's not like they're Cards fans whining the studio execs didn't spend to the cap! I think the problem is people are worried the overruns mean they had to do a ton of re-shoots, which is never a good sign for a movie.DiscussingFilm
@DiscussingFilm
·
1h
Todd Phillips says fans who care about the high budget of ‘JOKER 2’ sound like studio execs.“Shouldn’t people be happy that we got this money out of them, and we used it to go hire a bunch of crew people who can then feed their families?”(Source: https://variety.com/2024/film/features/todd-phillips-joker-2-movie-interview-1236111122/)