I mean seriously they aren't even talking about this anymore on the UA board. Not saying you Russ but UCLA fans are just obssessed with Turner it seems. From the reports on BRO, to the stalking QED, to insiders who know the Turner family and aren't surprised by this etc.
Just seems to be total sour grapes. Who cares anymore?
As for this weekend. I am looking for 2 wins obviously and I like our chances. Both teams have enough talent to win in Tucson but bottom line is UA has the best player and plays better defense. I'd like to see two blowouts but ill take two wins anyway we can.
Just gotta keep building that resume.
I think it's obvious why UCLA fans are interested, they really wanted Turner and are now wondering is this one of those cases where they "lucked out" in not getting a kid who may have been a problem.
It's not so much about Turner as it is about Drew Gordon, Bobo Morgan and Jerime Anderson who all had their own issues that UCLA dealt with and made UCLA fans somewhat leery of that situation.
It's why Nelson is such a lightning rod on UCLA boards now.
I should add for me personally since Jrue I've been a much bigger skeptic, it kills me to watch how hard he plays in the NBA and how he just quit on UCLA after Howland called him out for not defending Klay Thompson correctly(going under screens) in their loss to WSU his only year at UCLA. He was so different in reality than in the hype that it really made me appreciate kids who play hard and don't have an agenda.
And if you read ESPN there's a blurb on there yesterday that points out New Mexico was 8-1 with Gordon ineligible and is 5-6 since he came eligible. Yes they're in conference now but the blurb said there are rumblings within the program the problem is chemistry and Gordon is part of the problem. Of course UCLA insiders know that Gordon was ran off UCLA because of that very thing, he cursed out Howland on the sideline of a loss last year(Fullerton I think) and the reports were both Honeycutt and Nelson had told Ben if Gordon stays, I leave, he was not well liked by teammates.
So when you see what Turner is doing UCLA fans immediately start to wonder did we dodge another bullet.
It's apparently why UCLA dropped Kendall Williams which looks like a huge mistake, they were concerned he had issues and having just gone through Gordon's freshman year they were not interested in taking on more, ironically now they're teammates.
The knock on Turner was always his mom was hyperinvolved, but this last series of events is something that caught people by surprise, if you don't follow Sac basketball you can't appreciate how big this kid was there and how much of a hit his reputation has taken over this. People blaming the coach are in the minority, most people are familiar with Swafford's past history and they believe he's a consistent guy and if you can't play for him you're probably going to have trouble in college too..
I hope Turner works it out I really like the kid, but it's a concerning trend. We saw a similar thing with nelson his senior year and while at times he's UCLA's best player I can tell you if you read BRO you will find very quickly a lot of UCLA fans are almost hoping he leaves because his effort is very inconsistent and people think he's actually at times more of a negative than a positive.
I found a site yesterday that has plus and minus stats
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/pl...us_minus_avg&chart2=minutes_avg&chart3=fg_pct
That URL is for Nelson but you can change teams and players to see UA kids if you want to. The interesting thing on Nelson is since Kansas, he's had only 2 games where he was a net positive for UCLA, that is they were better with him in the game than with him out, and one of those 2 the positve was just 1point. Cal was the one positive(15 points) that was significant.
Compare that with Derrick Williams who was plus 42 against WSU and you get an idea of how silly it is that ESPN2 is billing the game as Williams vs. Nelson, total mismatch if that's reality.