KK sucks azz too

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,740
Reaction score
1,032
Location
Rhode Island
I've attended nearly every home game since I was 5 (1999) and the father and grandfather deemed me worth bringing.

If I was so frustrated with the HC GM and QB that I'm trashing them online I probably would just take a step back from being a fan. Obviously criticism is deserved and thats what fans do but some people are so negative here I wonder why they come here to torture themselves.

But, to each his own!

I think going back the majority of this board in the early 2000s only bitched about the GM coach and QB play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,740
Reaction score
1,032
Location
Rhode Island
Would you rather have Wilks and McCoy and the clown show from last year. The record may not reflect it, but this team is much better.

I’d rather have BA Palmer and Bowels but looking back does nothing to say if I should like what’s going on now. I like kyler and KK as an OC but I don’t like him as a coach and I don’t like VJ or Keim so there’s loads of room for improvement on the coaching staff and on the field.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

wit3card

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Posts
2,948
Reaction score
1,782
Okay now I’m curious, who here thinks it’s a smart strategy to run with 1:43 left in game in which you’re trailing with the goal being to run clock so your opponent doesn’t have enough time to score after you score.

I will unabashedly report that in my mind this is one of single dumbest reasons to run - to milk clock - when you’re trailing with only 1:43 left and you’re 75 yards from winning the ballgame.
Ever HC that has played Brady/Rodgers/Wilson or has a really bad D
 

FB94

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
3,772
Reaction score
4,917
Location
Anthem
If KK is making the same mistakes in year two then I will be a little concerned. Willing to give him this year to learn on the job and apply what he learned next year
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,529
Reaction score
7,221
Location
Orange County, CA
You’re not understanding my question. I’m not asking if you (or Kliff) would run trying to catch the D unprepared to get yardage. I’m asking would you try to milk clock with the ball at the 25 and 1:43 left. That’s what’s being argued, that they had to run to milk clock so the other team wouldn’t have enough time to comeback and score again. I think that’s patently absurd.
Yeah, i think there was enough time left to take a chance on a run play in that situation - but i definitely don't think the Cardinals "needed to milk the clock" at that point. If they got into field goal position and there was still a lot of time on the clock, they could've milked it at the end of the drive, but you definitely don't want to milk it at the beginning of the drive with only 1:43 left!

...dbs
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
I think it is excusable, considering we scored with too much time in the 1st half and our defense allowed them to march down the field. When you have 1:43, and 2 time outs, running isn't a terrible strategy. Wasting 30+ seconds after that is inexcusable.
We had one timeout.

but again you’re not understanding my question. It’s not whether running is excusable. Wit’s claim is they had to run to milk clock. That’s nuts with 1:43 and 1 timeout.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
Ok clown thinks KK sucks azz.... move along clown, might as well not watch the Cardinals until we have a better coach.... see you then!!
Ah yes the “you’re not a real fan” garbage. Bravo. You’re really bringing enlightened conversation to the board. So much substance!
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,430
Reaction score
68,611
point taken. very cheap response out of me to just tell him to stop watching but his constant complaining is tiring.

If I was frustrated with the HC, the QBOF, and the GM then I wouldnt be watching the cardinals, let alone spend my time on a forum. seems odd.

seems odd that you'd still be a Cardinals fan after all these years if the above was the case... unless of course you've never been frustrated with the HC, QBOF and GM during all our years of putridity... which would be incredibly as well.

leave the above kind of crap off the board.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
point taken. very cheap response out of me to just tell him to stop watching but his constant complaining is tiring.

If I was frustrated with the HC, the QBOF, and the GM then I wouldnt be watching the cardinals, let alone spend my time on a forum. seems odd.
I’m actually a huge kyler fan. But also a realist. I recognize flaws in our front office, coaches and players. Living in a fantasyland where everything is peachy is a weird and foreign concept to me.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
Would you rather have Wilks and McCoy and the clown show from last year. The record may not reflect it, but this team is much better.
This whole thread originated immediately after the end of game mismanagement fiasco.

Here’s what I truly think about kk:

I see shades of his offensive flexibility. And I think it’s a positive. A big positive.

I think he frequently gets too cute instead of working what’s working and it derails the team.

I can’t understand most of his poor play calling in the red zone.

I like his newer age treatment of the players. And they seem to like him. That’s a good thing, as long as it lasts.

But more than anything I’m worried about his game management (or lack thereof). It would be one thing if we saw improvement, but we haven’t. It’s game 10. It’s not game 4. And we see the same ish. It concerns me that it’s either an inability to learn or an arrogance. Neither of which are good traits in a head coach.

mans that’s my position on kk. Mikes ahead of wilks. Yet to be determined if he’s a good nfl head coach.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,044
Reaction score
23,215
This whole thread originated immediately after the end of game mismanagement fiasco.

Here’s what I truly think about kk:

I see shades of his offensive flexibility. And I think it’s a positive. A big positive.

I think he frequently gets too cute instead of working what’s working and it derails the team.

I can’t understand most of his poor play calling in the red zone.

I like his newer age treatment of the players. And they seem to like him. That’s a good thing, as long as it lasts.

But more than anything I’m worried about his game management (or lack thereof). It would be one thing if we saw improvement, but we haven’t. It’s game 10. It’s not game 4. And we see the same ish. It concerns me that it’s either an inability to learn or an arrogance. Neither of which are good traits in a head coach.

mans that’s my position on kk. Mikes ahead of wilks. Yet to be determined if he’s a good nfl head coach.
Very fair.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
Yeah, i think there was enough time left to take a chance on a run play in that situation - but i definitely don't think the Cardinals "needed to milk the clock" at that point. If they got into field goal position and there was still a lot of time on the clock, they could've milked it at the end of the drive, but you definitely don't want to milk it at the beginning of the drive with only 1:43 left!

...dbs
EXACTLY!
 

gimpy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Posts
3,351
Reaction score
2,973
Location
Flagstaff, Az
Ouchie said, "I can’t understand most of his poor play calling in the red zone".

I thought most on here thought that his red zone play calling had improved from the first few games?
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
Ouchie said, "I can’t understand most of his poor play calling in the red zone".

I thought most on here thought that his red zone play calling had improved from the first few games?
It seemed to improve and then regress again.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,430
Reaction score
68,611
Yeah, i think there was enough time left to take a chance on a run play in that situation - but i definitely don't think the Cardinals "needed to milk the clock" at that point. If they got into field goal position and there was still a lot of time on the clock, they could've milked it at the end of the drive, but you definitely don't want to milk it at the beginning of the drive with only 1:43 left!

...dbs

this. ESPECIALLY because the bucs had no more TOs, which means if we could have driven down the field, we could have totally controlled how much time was left if we were in the position to score.

calling that kinda play if they wanted to "milk the clock"... at your own 25 while losing is ridiculous.
 

TaylorSwift

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
1,406
Reaction score
1,240
Location
Phoenix
Kliff is fine. His only issue is experience so far.

He is young so he is of lucid mind to correct errors.

Making these mistakes with years of NFL experience is far less forgiving.
 

Crimson Warrior

Dangerous Murray Zealot
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Posts
8,247
Reaction score
9,486
Location
Home of the Thunder
This whole thread originated immediately after the end of game mismanagement fiasco.

Here’s what I truly think about kk:

I see shades of his offensive flexibility. And I think it’s a positive. A big positive.

I think he frequently gets too cute instead of working what’s working and it derails the team.

I can’t understand most of his poor play calling in the red zone.

I like his newer age treatment of the players. And they seem to like him. That’s a good thing, as long as it lasts.

But more than anything I’m worried about his game management (or lack thereof). It would be one thing if we saw improvement, but we haven’t. It’s game 10. It’s not game 4. And we see the same ish. It concerns me that it’s either an inability to learn or an arrogance. Neither of which are good traits in a head coach.

mans that’s my position on kk. Mikes ahead of wilks. Yet to be determined if he’s a good nfl head coach.

A little light on credit for innovating play calling, but otherwise fair.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,247
Reaction score
11,852
We had one timeout.

but again you’re not understanding my question. It’s not whether running is excusable. Wit’s claim is they had to run to milk clock. That’s nuts with 1:43 and 1 timeout.

I understand your question. We don't know for sure that they ran the clock down on purpose. I am KK, I would strongly consider it, seeing how they marched down the field right before the half. You want to be the last team with the ball in that scenario.

Are you sure they had 1 time out? I will have to re-watch it, because I remember seeing 2 time outs.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,677
Reaction score
6,762
Location
Mesa, AZ
Kliff is fine. His only issue is experience so far.

He is young so he is of lucid mind to correct errors.

Making these mistakes with years of NFL experience is far less forgiving.

Pop Warner coaches don't call a run play there. Stop making excuses for a putrid play call given game situation. The NFL is not that different than college.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,681
Posts
5,410,697
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top