Chaplin
Better off silent
sorry, chap but i think the above, while not a load of bull, is probably a pile of it. uh, then we weren't perfectly open to giving him the Max. In the NBA, all MAX contracts are fully guaranteed. we gave him a contract that had major qualifiers. i mean, what if he broke his arm and couldn't play, or had a bad fall in a game and broke something else not related to his knee or eye? no player in the nba takes this kind of deal because they play in a contact sport and injuries DO happen and considering every time amare got hurt, he came back with FLYING colors, it was pretty petty on our part to offer a contract that no other superstar player in the league would touch and then turn around and say, well, we offered him the max.
i don't know how smart this business is. we're now bad, on the way to being terrible and being terrible for years as we have no pieces on this team that have any future. so, what would have been better business wise? Probably two more years of contending for a title with the outside chance that we're bad for three years because amare might get injured... or being bad for five years because we didn't sign him and then turned around and STILL spent the same amount of money on guys who have long-term contracts and have little to no value?
I'm sorry, but we're talking about the lesser of two evils here. Bad now, or horribly awful in 3 or 4 years when we are paying out 20million per for an injured player? Remember, it's not like Nash was going to be around in year 4 of Amare's contract. How bad would we be with no Nash, no Amare, and over 20 million unable to be be used because of the bad signing? New York was willing to take the risk, we were not.