Lakers Trade Fisher

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,193
Reaction score
1,475
Location
In The End Zone
it's a good move talent wise, but the Lakers now literally have NO ONE to stand up to Kobe and pretty much zero in the way of veteran leadership outside of Kobe.

Oh come on, Pau Gasol is now the guy to keep Kob...nevermind, I can't even do it in jest.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,193
Reaction score
1,475
Location
In The End Zone
And as much as Fisher sucked, I think any Laker fan who's truly honest with themselves will be gripping when Ramon Sessions is shooting a key three pointer at the end of a close game as opposed to Fish, who somehow always managed to hit big shots at key times throughout his career.

This is true - I love Fish and will miss him a ton..he was always good for the big shot. Ice water in that little dude's veins. And yes, if you give me the choice of old man fisher with the game on the line and an open look over Ramon, it's fish all damn day.

But it's the other 47:58 that I'm more concerned about.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,193
Reaction score
1,475
Location
In The End Zone
Not that impossible. Fisher is allowing opposing guard scoring of 14.0 Pts per 48. Sessions is allowing 16 pts per 48. So, as bad as you think Fisher is...Sessions has been playing worse according to opposing PG scoring.

I don't believe in stats like that - scoring by position is sooooo unrelated to the actual defense played. It's a combination of factors - for example, Fish will get burned by his guy and saved by Bynum/Pau at the rim making plays. That doesn't show up in stats, but the penetration given up is the problem. Kickouts to shooters also a problem when the PG is burned. You get caught up in switches a lot, especially by design, to create mismatches.

I've been watching Sessions for a couple months now when I can since we've been looking at him, and I've watched Fish forever. Sessions is a better basic defender than Fisher (not hard) and doesn't give up penetration nearly as easily. The stats test is one thing, but the eye test is golden.
 
OP
OP
Covert Rain

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
37,104
Reaction score
16,270
Location
Arizona
I don't believe in stats like that - scoring by position is sooooo unrelated to the actual defense played. It's a combination of factors - for example, Fish will get burned by his guy and saved by Bynum/Pau at the rim making plays. That doesn't show up in stats, but the penetration given up is the problem. Kickouts to shooters also a problem when the PG is burned. You get caught up in switches a lot, especially by design, to create mismatches.

I've been watching Sessions for a couple months now when I can since we've been looking at him, and I've watched Fish forever. Sessions is a better basic defender than Fisher (not hard) and doesn't give up penetration nearly as easily. The stats test is one thing, but the eye test is golden.

Oh come on Donald. Unrelated? I can show you correlated stats that support it. It's absolutely related but you can't look at it in a vacuum.

Sessions give up more points to opposing guards per 48, is #50 in the NBA in steals (Fisher 35), has an overall worse back court defensive efficiency rating compared to Lakers pre-trade, averages more turnovers which also impacts team defense and has lost 9 out of the last 15 PG match-ups (Diffeff). That is a major contributing factor as why the Cavs are 25th in the league at defensive efficiency.

That's horrible.

I still think it's a move the Lakers maybe needed because of the offense and I am in no way defending Fisher's play at all. He has not been playing well. Just trying to put some reality into what you are possibly getting on defense.
 
Last edited:

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,680
Reaction score
5,528
Location
Vegas
it's a good move talent wise, but the Lakers now literally have NO ONE to stand up to Kobe and pretty much zero in the way of veteran leadership outside of Kobe. And as much as Fisher sucked, I think any Laker fan who's truly honest with themselves will be gripping when Ramon Sessions is shooting a key three pointer at the end of a close game as opposed to Fish, who somehow always managed to hit big shots at key times throughout his career.
I agree with you. If I were the lakers I would have kept fisher as a backup player. he is a veteran leader and is a savy player, kind of like what kidd is to the mavs. he clearly no longer has the ability to score the ball like he once did, but if he is fresh he does have the ability to hit those big shots in the 4th quarter of games and outside of kobe the lakers don't really have that on the perimeter. unfortunately they were desperate to make some type of move and this was the one that they had to make. the lakers really were hurt by the league overriding the chris paul trade. IMO that really set their franchise back regardless of how far they go this year(which won't be a ring in the end).
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
45,193
Reaction score
1,475
Location
In The End Zone
I agree with you. If I were the lakers I would have kept fisher as a backup player. he is a veteran leader and is a savy player, kind of like what kidd is to the mavs. he clearly no longer has the ability to score the ball like he once did, but if he is fresh he does have the ability to hit those big shots in the 4th quarter of games and outside of kobe the lakers don't really have that on the perimeter.

Problem is, Fish wouldn't have been down with that. It was very touchy - Fish would not have gone quietly. Unfortunately, moving him was the only way to bench him. He already was a starter in name only, with Blake taking most of the minutes and playing most of the closing parts of games. Fish would never have played 3rd wheel.

And Sessions looked good last night - the difference in the offense when he was in was striking...and he hadn't even practiced with the team yet. He was second on the team with a +8 behind Bynum's +15.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,437
Reaction score
11,599
If I'm Houston I dont buy him out. I terminate his contract. If Fish has been refusing to communicate with them they have every right to shred his deal and withhold the money.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,135
Reaction score
60,711
Wow. Derek Fisher gave up his $3.4M salary for 12-13 in buyout. I don't know if he ever gets all that money back even if he signs with a contender for the rest of the season and plays next season.

The link appears not to be working at RealGM.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/219925/Fisher_Gave_Up_Entire_$34M_Salary_For_12_13_In_Buyout
 
OP
OP
Covert Rain

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
37,104
Reaction score
16,270
Location
Arizona
Still way to early but Lakers pre-trade were giving up 93.2 PPG (8th best) and since trade are now giving up 102.3 PPG (2nd worst) with these last 3 games almost giving up 100 in each (2 were over 100).
 
Last edited:

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,437
Reaction score
11,599
I dont get it. All Fisher has left is his name. A point guard who cant shoot, pass, or defend. Great pickup OKC.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,600
Reaction score
9,920
Location
L.A. area
I dont get it. All Fisher has left is his name. A point guard who cant shoot, pass, or defend. Great pickup OKC.

It keeps him away from other teams, and maybe he'll have some inside scoop on the Lakers if they meet in the playoffs. I assume he'd want to beat them.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,488
Reaction score
71,183
It keeps him away from other teams, and maybe he'll have some inside scoop on the Lakers if they meet in the playoffs. I assume he'd want to beat them.

and he's a very good veteran presence on a team with basically none. it's a very good move for the Thunder.
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,680
Reaction score
5,528
Location
Vegas
and he's a very good veteran presence on a team with basically none. it's a very good move for the Thunder.
it is a good move for them. they lost maynor(or however it is spelled) and that can't be replaced. but fisher is a good pickup for them. he probably won't do a lot for them scoring wise, but you never know. and they don't really need scoring, they need veterans that can play tough in the playoffs and fish gives them that option. last year when caron butler blew his knee out I thought the mavericks championship hopes were doomed. they added peja at the trade deadline and it wasn't that big of a move. He didn't do much at all really, but he wound up saving them in game 3 vs the lakers.
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,680
Reaction score
5,528
Location
Vegas
Still way to early but Lakers pre-trade were giving up 93.2 PPG (8th best) and since trade are now giving up 102.3 PPG (2nd worst) with these last 3 games almost giving up 100 in each (2 were over 100).
let's hope that trend continues tonight. although for the mavs sake I would have rather them kept fisher. he is not a threat to score other than the occasional 3 pointer that he will make here and there.
 

Bufalay

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 21, 2006
Posts
4,679
Reaction score
786
If he's still allowed to cheat then he will be a big help for the Thunder.
 

Lorenzo

Registered User
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Posts
10,680
Reaction score
5,528
Location
Vegas
Did you see that game last night...or at least hear about it. K. Love 50 points and the thunder win still. reminded me of a game a few years ago that dallas played against golden state. dirk scored 50 and jrich hit a halfcourt 3 at the buzzer to win.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
558,239
Posts
5,453,504
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top